Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

  1. #1
    GOREDSGO32
    Guest

    Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    I'm not understand how this works.

    Reds traded for him, Yankees are paying for a large size of his contract already. The Reds pay for the rest, DFA'd him, and the Cubs signed him. What are the Reds paying now, what are the Cubs paying, what are the Yankees paying?

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Puffy's Daddy Red Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    20,422

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    Not sure of the particulars.

    Womack's contract for 2006 was $2.0M.
    Yanks gave the Reds $900,000 in the trade.
    Reds were responsible for $1.1M of the rest of his contract.
    Not sure where the money gets divided after that, or if it does.
    From what I understand, the Reds may be on the hook for the full $1.1 - major league minimum (the amount the Cubs are paying him)
    But I'm not 100% on that.
    'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.'
    -Snoop on his retirement

    Your Mom is happy.

  4. #3
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Leader
    Not sure of the particulars.

    Womack's contract for 2006 was $2.0M.
    Yanks gave the Reds $900,000 in the trade.
    Reds were responsible for $1.1M of the rest of his contract.
    Not sure where the money gets divided after that.
    The Cubs have to pay the minimum, the Reds are responsible for the rest.
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  5. #4
    GOREDSGO32
    Guest

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    What's the major league minimum?

  6. #5
    Puffy's Daddy Red Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    20,422

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by GOREDSGO32
    What's the major league minimum?

    The minimum salary for the 2006 season is $327,000.00

    The Reds are on the hook for $773,000.00 of Womack's salary this year.

    Thanks, Mr. O'Brien.
    'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.'
    -Snoop on his retirement

    Your Mom is happy.

  7. #6
    GOREDSGO32
    Guest

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    Oh well .. thats not a crapload of money really in today's game. A toss in the bucket compared to what Milton and Wilson are earning.

  8. #7
    Joe Oliver love-child Blimpie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    4,888

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by GOREDSGO32
    Oh well .. thats not a crapload of money really in today's game. A toss in the bucket compared to what Milton and Wilson are earning.
    Say, who is this Wilson fellow you are referring to? Can he pitch?
    "Booing on opening day is like telling grandma her house smells like old lady."--WOY

  9. #8
    15 game winner Danny Serafini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sultanes de Monterrey
    Posts
    4,182

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Leader
    The minimum salary for the 2006 season is $327,000.00

    The Reds are on the hook for $773,000.00 of Womack's salary this year.

    Thanks, Mr. O'Brien.
    The Cubs only have to pay the minimum prorated from the time they pick him up, so they'll only have to pay something in the neighborhood of $250,000.

  10. #9
    GOREDSGO32
    Guest

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by Blimpie
    Say, who is this Wilson fellow you are referring to? Can he pitch?
    Um .. Paul Wilson? Apparently he can't pitch, but he's still getting paid all the same.

  11. #10
    Puffy's Daddy Red Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    20,422

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by Danny Serafini
    The Cubs only have to pay the minimum prorated from the time they pick him up, so they'll only have to pay something in the neighborhood of $250,000.
    Doh! Thanks. I knew time came into the formula somewhere....
    'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.'
    -Snoop on his retirement

    Your Mom is happy.

  12. #11
    Joe Oliver love-child Blimpie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    4,888

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by Danny Serafini
    The Cubs only have to pay the minimum prorated from the time they pick him up, so they'll only have to pay something in the neighborhood of $250,000.
    For that kinda cabbage, the Cubs should have just called Girl Friday.
    "Booing on opening day is like telling grandma her house smells like old lady."--WOY

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    472

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    Isn't the minimum scale based on years of service, i.e. the minimum for somebody with 4 years is higher than the minimum for somebody who is a raw rookie?

    I thought I saw something in the neighborhood of $500,000 mentioned as the minimum for someone of Aurilia's experience level when they were negociating with him over the winter. If this is the case, the Reds should be getting back more than $250,000 from the Cubs on Womack.

  14. #13
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    34,167

    Re: Did the Cubs take on Womack's contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by jnwohio
    Isn't the minimum scale based on years of service, i.e. the minimum for somebody with 4 years is higher than the minimum for somebody who is a raw rookie?

    I thought I saw something in the neighborhood of $500,000 mentioned as the minimum for someone of Aurilia's experience level when they were negociating with him over the winter. If this is the case, the Reds should be getting back more than $250,000 from the Cubs on Womack.
    No. Theoretically, a guy with 4 years of service can still make the minimum just like a rookie. Of course because of arbitration, a guy with over 3 years of service can make much more than the minimum. I think what they were talking about with Aurilia was that a guy with his experience should command a certain amount of money. Usually veterans that are picked up off the scrap heap can command at least $500K. They could pay him the minimum but most teams will not just out of respect to the guys service time.
    The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25