You guys know what to do.
A - Narron's my boy, and he's one of the best managers in baseball!
B - Narron does a pretty good job overall, and I'm pleased with his management.
C - Meah
D - Narron's on thin ice, and the ice is quickly beginning to crack.
F - Narron should be fired right now.
You guys know what to do.
Last edited by Cyclone792; 06-20-2006 at 11:39 PM.
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012
Put an end to the Lost Decade.
I gave him a C, beucase while he has shown good results, I think has managed this team VERY poorly.
He's a good stop gap but he won't be the manager to get this team past a .500 record.
Hasn't he now managed the team for a full season, with a record above .500?Originally Posted by KronoRed
I didn't vote because there wasn't a choice that fits my position. I want him gone by spring training next year. The Reds are in a position to win with a lot of young talent and I don't see him as a manager who will develop and play young guys if he has any other choice(yeah, I know about Hamilton - he's a special case). The only reason I'd let him finish the season here is because Hamilton probably feels more comfortable with the Narrons. Since I see 07 as a lost cause I can live with Narron on the chance it might be good for Hamilton.
I changed my mind after watching Narron abuse our two best starters(both of whom the Reds control thru 2011), showing no emotion over several terrible misplays and a horrible call on the last pitch. By trying to save his job he could injure BA and/or AH and cripple the Reds chances for several years. Replace him now! F
You said it better than I did, Cyclone
Last edited by Stingray; 05-17-2007 at 12:48 AM.
I think he's on thin ice, but I think that started to break once Cast took over. He was and is a lame duck as I see it. His use of the few good players he has has not been acceptable, but I don't think Sparky, Lou, Cox et. al. would have had this team playing substantially better. Maybe worth a few more wins.
This place use to be fun
B for Bullpen. Because if Narron had a better bullpen he'd be in first place, which in the game of baseball is a pretty good place in the standings.
I only have one major bone, and that is his lineup construction, and because I think that is a huge part of being a manager, I went with a C.
He has to stop playing favorites, it makes me ill to see Richie batting cleanup, especially vs. a RH.
On a side note, never bring in Yan with the bases loaded in a close ball game, that is managerial suicide.
I think he does a pretty good job as a clubhouse guy but he seems to really depend a little too much on guys like Aurilia for my taste. Plus he tinkers too much. I don't think he should be fired, but I'm not sure he shoudl be asked back either.
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun
I think the Reds will continue this year to be a work in progress. Frankly while I'm not fond of listening to Narron on the radio, I'm curious to see how he'd be with a team just a bit better - or rather more consistent. I like his philosphy and would like to see him get a better bullpen to hold on to leads or keep us in it on close games. My goodness! Did we once think we'd have a reasonably good starting staff? Imagine if our BP was better!
Jerry is average. He is not the reason the Reds are struggling of late.
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand
Any manager would be struggling with this BP. I'd have pulled my hair out till I was bald by the All-Star break. :Originally Posted by flyer85
Last edited by GAC; 06-24-2006 at 06:31 AM.
"panic" only comes from having real expectations
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.