Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

  1. #1
    Yay!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Middletown, Ohio
    Posts
    7,430

    '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    http://sports.espn.go.com/chat/sport...timeWS/bracket

    Don't know if you guys watched this or not?

    It was moderately entertaining, especially when the BRM knocked off Tommy Lasorda's '55 Dodgers and he took it personally.

    Note: No love for the '09 Pirates, '05 Giants, or '07 Cubs, the top 3 seeds in the NL bracket.
    When all is said and done more is said than done.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    18

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    I had those two teams in my finals! I'll let you figure out who I voted for.

  4. #3
    * Bat Votto Second * goreds2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    OH H - EYE OH
    Posts
    2,675

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    I thought the 1976 Reds were a better team than 1975 with 3 very good rookie pitchers of (Parden the spelling) Pat Zachery, Santo Alcula and Manny Sarmento.

    Plus, this team was undefeated in the post season. (7-0)
    * Attended the 1990 and 2010 Reds Division clinchers *

    Watched the 2012 Clincher on FOX.
    Proud owner of a 1990 Dodge Class B Motorhome: A chick magnet!
    GO STEELERS
    www.tracyjonesonline.com
    Great YOUTUBE videos.

  5. #4
    Yay!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Middletown, Ohio
    Posts
    7,430

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    Quote Originally Posted by goreds2
    I thought the 1976 Reds were a better team than 1975 with 3 very good rookie pitchers of (Parden the spelling) Pat Zachery, Santo Alcula and Manny Sarmento.

    Plus, this team was undefeated in the post season. (7-0)
    1975: 108-54 Scored 840 runs, Allowed 586 runs. Pythagorean W-L: 107-55
    1976: 102-60 Scored 857 runs, Allowed 633 runs. Pythagorean W-L: 103-59
    When all is said and done more is said than done.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    727

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    Quote Originally Posted by goreds2
    I thought the 1976 Reds were a better team than 1975 with 3 very good rookie pitchers of (Parden the spelling) Pat Zachery, Santo Alcula and Manny Sarmento.

    Plus, this team was undefeated in the post season. (7-0)
    I agree, but the experts always take the 1975 Reds due to Johnny Bench, Will McEnaney and Tony Perez having better years and the glamour of the 1975 WS. They also won more games in 1975, but I'll take the 1976 Reds myself.

  7. #6
    * Bat Votto Second * goreds2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    OH H - EYE OH
    Posts
    2,675

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    Quote Originally Posted by dougflynn23
    I agree, but the experts always take the 1975 Reds due to Johnny Bench, Will McEnaney and Tony Perez having better years and the glamour of the 1975 WS. They also won more games in 1975, but I'll take the 1976 Reds myself.
    Doug Flynn contributed big in 1976 when Joe Morgan was injuried.
    * Attended the 1990 and 2010 Reds Division clinchers *

    Watched the 2012 Clincher on FOX.
    Proud owner of a 1990 Dodge Class B Motorhome: A chick magnet!
    GO STEELERS
    www.tracyjonesonline.com
    Great YOUTUBE videos.

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    580

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    I watched 90% of the entire 3 hours show and loved it. They took it a step further. It wasnt your usual "Best Team of All-Time" tournement. Some might think it was corny but i liked it. They talked about how the '27 Yankees would have to play 3 games on astroturf.

    Both the Yanks and Reds dominated their way through the brackets. They would usually win their games by a 75% for them and 25% for whoever the other team would be. The "World Series" was a lot closer than i thought it would be. There was over 1 million votes cast. I figured this was the way it would end but it gave me some baseball to watch on this boreing day.

    Also they had a phone interview with Joe Morgan and he said he would take his team up against any team and he believes they would win but he said its also hard to vote against Ruth. He also said he liked the '76 team better but he thought they could win with the '75 team too.

    Overall I loved it. I loved how they got into it rather than just comparing the two teams. And it gave me something baseball to watch other than the AAA game.
    Last edited by Shaknb8k; 07-12-2006 at 10:18 PM.

  9. #8
    Titanic Struggles Caveat Emperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The 513
    Posts
    12,642

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    Quote Originally Posted by dabvu2498
    http://sports.espn.go.com/chat/sport...timeWS/bracket

    Don't know if you guys watched this or not?

    It was moderately entertaining, especially when the BRM knocked off Tommy Lasorda's '55 Dodgers and he took it personally.

    Note: No love for the '09 Pirates, '05 Giants, or '07 Cubs, the top 3 seeds in the NL bracket.
    Well, lets face it -- does anyone who reads ESPN.com really take this seriously and investigate just how good any team from the turn of the century-era really is?
    Championships Matter.
    23 Years and Counting...

  10. #9
    Yay!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Middletown, Ohio
    Posts
    7,430

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    Quote Originally Posted by Caveat Emperor
    Well, lets face it -- does anyone who reads ESPN.com really take this seriously and investigate just how good any team from the turn of the century-era really is?
    I was surprised that they (ESPN) gave those three teams the top 3 seeds, given their love for the ultra-modern. Heck, when I heard they were doing this, I expected the 2004 Red Sox to be on there and for them to win it.
    When all is said and done more is said than done.

  11. #10
    Member cumberlandreds's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Sterling VA
    Posts
    9,247

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    I'm surprised they had two teams that existed before ESPN did. I can live with being runner up to the 27 Yankees. Most "experts" consider that team the best of all time.
    Reds Fan Since 1971

  12. #11
    Davey BuckWoody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    911

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    It's been my experience over the years with these greatest team of all time tournaments that it almost always comes down to the '27 Yankees and the '75 Reds and the Yankess edge them out by a close margin.

    I rememeber a few years back, can't remember the site though, they had those two teams in a 7 game series where the Yankees won game 7 on a homer by the Babe in the ninth.

  13. #12
    Member cumberlandreds's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Sterling VA
    Posts
    9,247

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    Quote Originally Posted by BuckWoody
    It's been my experience over the years with these greatest team of all time tournaments that it almost always comes down to the '27 Yankees and the '75 Reds and the Yankess edge them out by a close margin.

    I rememeber a few years back, can't remember the site though, they had those two teams in a 7 game series where the Yankees won game 7 on a homer by the Babe in the ninth.
    I used to match these two up in Strat-O-Matic and '27 Yankees would almost always win the series. Usualy in four or five games.
    Reds Fan Since 1971

  14. #13
    Churlish Johnny Footstool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Olathe, KS
    Posts
    13,790

    Re: '75 Reds 2nd to '27 Yankees (ESPN)

    I'm kind of proud that so many non-Reds fans acknowledged the '75 Reds as the best NL team.
    "I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25