Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 62

Thread: The Myth of BABIP

  1. #1
    Winning the Human Race TheBigLebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Titletown, FL
    Posts
    3,852

    The Myth of BABIP

    Our resident stat mongers here at RZ frequently refer to a pitcher's BABIP during discussions about his effectiveness.

    Until about 2 weeks ago, I had no idea what BABIP even was.

    For those of you in the dark like I was, BABIP = Batting Average of Balls hit In Play.

    Those that explained it to me were also quick to point out that a pitcher has no control whatsoever of his BABIP.

    I respectfully and calmly disagree.

    Consider:

    Theoretically, a batting tee and Johan Santana both have measurable BABIP.

    I do not think anyone here will disagree when I assert that it is obvious on its face that a batting tee will have a higher BABIP than Santana should all other variables be constant. The degree of difficulty in hitting a Santana changeup is quite bit higher than that of hitting a stationary baseball off a waist-high tee.

    Taking that line of thinking a step further, it is then logical to believe that Johan Santana will have a lower BABIP than Dave Williams as Johan is 100x the pitcher Williams is and, it is therefore more diffucult to hit his pitches well.

    I do acknowledge that BABIP does not consider walks and strikeouts, and I do know that most pitcher's ultimate goal is to miss bats. However, accepting the tack that a pitcher does not have any control over his BABIP means that one has to accept that a pitcher who pitches to contact using good location and changing speeds cannot ultimately succeed. Greg Maddux is a perfect example.

    Can it not be logically inferred that well-pitched balls are more difficult to hit than poorly pitched balls? Many here are actually using Majewski's high BABIP as a mitigating factor towards his performance to date a Red. "Hell, he's been unlucky! Check his BABIP! It's bound to come down!"

    While I do agree that his ERA & BABIP are both likely to come down, I assert that (warning, overused RZ phrase following) it would be due to GM "regressing to the mean." The guy simply will not maintain this 19.00 ERA (or whatever the hell it is). He will eventually get more guys out, and his ERA and BABIP will see a resultant drop. I fear many are confusing the effect for the cause.

    That's my thought on the matter. It seems too obvious to me, which tells me there might be something else used to calculate BABIP of which I am unaware. However, if I am understanding it correctly, it seems to be a bit of a Straw Man.
    Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,296

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    Good post...but let the flood of negative rep points begin.

  4. #3
    Winning the Human Race TheBigLebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Titletown, FL
    Posts
    3,852

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    I don't know why I'd be negged...I didn't call anyone out or state that anyone that disagrees with me is stupid for doing so...I actually want more posts from those who disagree b/c I fear there's a lot about this stat that I may not know.
    Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    4,056

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    TBL - I agree with you and I use that stat a bit too. Like Ramon Ortiz, his BABIP seems to be relatively higher because he just doesn't miss bats well (off the top of my head, haven't look this up). Then guys like Harang, with the same fielders last year would have a lower number because he strikes out guys, and odds are, someone who strikes out a lot of guys doesn't give up a lot of solid shots. So when contact is made, it is weaker.

    Again, that was just off the top of my head, so that is more of a guess and opinion than anything.

  6. #5
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBigLebowski
    Taking that line of thinking a step further, it is then logical to believe that Johan Santana will have a lower BABIP than Dave Williams as Johan is 100x the pitcher Williams is and, it is therefore more diffucult to hit his pitches well.
    intuitively it would seem to but the data and the research doesn't support it. His better stuff results in less walks, fewer HRs and a lot more Ks (those things not subject to BABIP) and that is what makes him a great pitcher. The data certainly suggest that there is a randomness to BABIP that is not subject to talent. Both Johnson and Schilling had a season that was "bad" while in Arizona almost entirely due to a very high BABIP even though they had some of the best "stuff" in all of baseball.
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  7. #6
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    BABIP is what allowed people to predict that what the Reds were getting in Majewski and Cormier were not the pitchers their ERA suggested the Reds were getting. That was because they both had been BABIP lucky up to the point of their trades.

    Could their luck have continued? Sure but the odds very heavily against and much more in favor of a coming correction.
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  8. #7
    Member SteelSD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    9,322

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    Quote Originally Posted by AvesIce51
    TBL - I agree with you and I use that stat a bit too. Like Ramon Ortiz, his BABIP seems to be relatively higher because he just doesn't miss bats well (off the top of my head, haven't look this up). Then guys like Harang, with the same fielders last year would have a lower number because he strikes out guys, and odds are, someone who strikes out a lot of guys doesn't give up a lot of solid shots. So when contact is made, it is weaker.

    Again, that was just off the top of my head, so that is more of a guess and opinion than anything.
    That's not how it works. BABIP is independent of K rate.
    "The problem with strikeouts isn't that they hurt your team, it's that they hurt your feelings..." --Rob Neyer

    "The single most important thing for a hitter is to get a good pitch to hit. A good hitter can hit a pitch thats over the plate three times better than a great hitter with a ball in a tough spot.
    --Ted Williams

  9. #8
    Winning the Human Race TheBigLebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Titletown, FL
    Posts
    3,852

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    Quote Originally Posted by flyer85
    BABIP is what allowed people to predict that what the Reds were getting in Majewski and Cormier were not the pitchers their ERA suggested the Reds were getting. That was because they both had been BABIP lucky up to the point of their trades.

    Could their luck have continued? Sure but the odds very heavily against and much more in favor of a coming correction.

    First of all, thank you for your constructive reply. I was worried that this thread may become a bit intractable.

    It just seems to me that BABIP is statistically insignificant. It can be argued that a high BABIP can forgive a bad ERA or be the nexus of it. It appears that people who pay a lot of attention to the stat are using it to defend positions both ways. My take is that bad stuff gets hit hard and good stuff doesn't. BABIP does not explain away the bad seasons for Schilling and Johnson you referenced. You can have good stuff and still pitch poorly. Conversely, you can have bad stuff and still put together a nice season (see: Haynes, Jimmy).

    To sum, BABIP is the result, not the cause and, therefore an insignificant statistic.
    Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available.

  10. #9
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,898

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    Quote Originally Posted by flyer85
    BABIP is what allowed people to predict that what the Reds were getting in Majewski and Cormier were not the pitchers their ERA suggested the Reds were getting.
    Well, that and several other peripherals.

  11. #10
    Winning the Human Race TheBigLebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Titletown, FL
    Posts
    3,852

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer
    Well, that and several other peripherals.
    Yeah..I don't think Krivsky made those moves based on Majewski's BABIP.
    Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available.

  12. #11
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBigLebowski
    BABIP does not explain away the bad seasons for Schilling and Johnson you referenced.
    You're missing the point. In essence it is in a simplistic form a measure of "luck". So when someone has a bad year, a bad stretch(or a good stretch), etc, it helps to assess if it was due to talent or did luck(BABIP) play a part in their success/failure.

    It allows one to assess whether success/failure is likely to continue or if their is a likely correction coming. Someone can have a "bad or good" year due to their BABIP and in contrast to their talent level.

    When deciding who to target and acquire I would say trying to assess whether luck has played a part would be a big factor.
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  13. #12
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer
    Well, that and several other peripherals.
    those other peripherals pointed to the fact that the ERA was not a true reflection of their level of performance and if their luck(BABIP) turned bad then a correction was coming.
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  14. #13
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,898

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    Quote Originally Posted by flyer85
    those other peripherals pointed to the fact that the ERA was not a true reflection of their level of performance and if their luck(BABIP) turned bad then a correction was coming.
    Right, but one could look at his entire career course, and if one understands what each stat means, where said pitcher is pitching his home games, etc. I try to follow several metrics over the course of his career as well as other amorphous factors, like age.

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    4,056

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    Quote Originally Posted by SteelSD
    That's not how it works. BABIP is independent of K rate.
    I understand that. Please read it a bit more carefully.

    because he strikes out guys, and odds are, someone who strikes out a lot of guys doesn't give up a lot of solid shots. So when contact is made, it is weaker
    What I'm saying is that weaker contact is usually made off of a strikeout pitcher because he misses bats in the first place. So unless it is an awful mistake, chances are it isn't hit that hard.

  16. #15
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: The Myth of BABIP

    in general,

    K rate, BB rate and HR rate tell most of what you need to know about a pitcher.

    When assessing talent I pay little attention to stats like ERA and WHIP.
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25