Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Kearns and Lopez

  1. #1
    Member Wheelhouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,896

    Kearns and Lopez

    Just took a look at their performances with DC--Kearns hitting .233 with a .685 OPS Lopez hitting the same as when he was with the Reds, but has SEVEN errors in 29 games. I'm glad that stuff is happening for JIMBO's team. Kearns packing it in is a little disappointing though...
    "Don't trust any statistics you did not fake yourself."--Winston Churchill

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Churlish Johnny Footstool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Olathe, KS
    Posts
    13,782

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    Shall we dig up the miserable numbers for Majewski and Bray in Cincinnati?

    Or shall we just drop it for a while?
    "I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful

  4. #3
    Worst Behavior. reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,267

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    The trade sucked for both teams.



    /thread

  5. #4
    Member Wheelhouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,896

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Footstool
    Shall we dig up the miserable numbers for Majewski and Bray in Cincinnati?

    Or shall we just drop it for a while?
    Well, simple question, given:

    The performances of players---remember, this includes the performance of the Reds' bullpen pre-trade, and the performances of the players who have replaced traded players---Is the team better on balance? I would say yes. Majewski and Bray have fared about as well as their predecessors, with maybe a little edge to Bray. Freel in right is an upgrade both offensively and defensively (so far) and Clayton was a move down, but if Rich plays SS it's an upgrade both defensively and offensively. So on balance, today, I'd say the Reds are better because of the trade. I like the lineup today better than any lineup Narron could put out with Kearns and Lopez in it...that's what matters to me.
    "Don't trust any statistics you did not fake yourself."--Winston Churchill

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    The Bush Leagues
    Posts
    9,040

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheelhouse
    Just took a look at their performances with DC--Kearns hitting .233 with a .685 OPS Lopez hitting the same as when he was with the Reds, but has SEVEN errors in 29 games. I'm glad that stuff is happening for JIMBO's team. Kearns packing it in is a little disappointing though...
    Hazy and lazy were the ones that had to go, that's never been the question. But could the return have been better? Greg Maddux-better?
    The widow is gathering nettles for her children's dinner; a perfumed seigneur, delicately lounging in the Oeil de Boeuf, hath an alchemy whereby he will extract the third nettle and call it rent. ~ Carlyle

  7. #6
    Churlish Johnny Footstool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Olathe, KS
    Posts
    13,782

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheelhouse
    Well, simple question, given:

    The performances of players---remember, this includes the performance of the Reds' bullpen pre-trade, and the performances of the players who have replaced traded players---Is the team better on balance? I would say yes. Majewski and Bray have fared about as well as their predecessors, with maybe a little edge to Bray. Freel in right is an upgrade both offensively and defensively (so far) and Clayton was a move down, but if Rich plays SS it's an upgrade both defensively and offensively. So on balance, today, I'd say the Reds are better because of the trade. I like the lineup today better than any lineup Narron could put out with Kearns and Lopez in it...that's what matters to me.
    Better on paper? Maybe, according to some. Better in terms of performance? No. Majewski's and Bray's stats speak for themselves.

    In terms of Freel replacing Kearns and Aurilia, those moves could have been made without the trade.
    "I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    1,045

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    Quote Originally Posted by Rojo
    Hazy and lazy were the ones that had to go, that's never been the question. But could the return have been better? Greg Maddux-better?
    Rojo, I agree. This is the only question worth debating, isn't it?

    So let's answer it. Who were the other arms that were traded or reasonably believed to be on the market that would have been arguably a better return over the past month or so?

    My initial list:

    Maddux
    Wickman
    Baez
    Hendrickson
    Hernandez
    Lidle

    Lieber
    Lidge
    Linebrink
    Willis

    I'm sure there are others.

    Now, are there any of those arms that would have been better (factoring in short and long term as you see fit) and available to the Reds?

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Newburgh, IN
    Posts
    3,458

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    I'd actually say Clayton who came in the trade has done ok. Not great, but ok. But with Kearns and FeLo gone it looks like we can get EE, BP, Freel, Hatte, and RA all in the starting line up at the same time. That's a good thing, but are bench is weeker. I think Kearns is unhappy. I don't blame him. Go from contender in cincy with friends to Bowden and Nationals who are out of it. Tough on a player.
    And This One Belongs to the REDS!!!

  10. #9
    Churlish Johnny Footstool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Olathe, KS
    Posts
    13,782

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    Quote Originally Posted by Reds1
    I'd actually say Clayton who came in the trade has done ok. Not great, but ok. But with Kearns and FeLo gone it looks like we can get EE, BP, Freel, Hatte, and RA all in the starting line up at the same time. That's a good thing, but are bench is weeker. I think Kearns is unhappy. I don't blame him. Go from contender in cincy with friends to Bowden and Nationals who are out of it. Tough on a player.
    Why couldn't the Reds have done that before the trade, though? Is there any reason?
    "I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Newburgh, IN
    Posts
    3,458

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    If they would have done that then Kearns and FeLo have no trade value.
    And This One Belongs to the REDS!!!

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NorthEast
    Posts
    1,002

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Footstool
    Better on paper? Maybe, according to some. Better in terms of performance? No. Majewski's and Bray's stats speak for themselves.

    In terms of Freel replacing Kearns and Aurilia, those moves could have been made without the trade.
    You say the trade may be better on paper but you quote the stats as being a measure of performance. The stats are the paper the results are the performance. FWIW Bray has contributed greatly to the success of the bullpen lately and Harris may be on his way to contributing to the REDS next year with BP in the middle infield.

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    The Bush Leagues
    Posts
    9,040

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    The thing of it is that Wayne thought this trade helped this year and in future years.
    The widow is gathering nettles for her children's dinner; a perfumed seigneur, delicately lounging in the Oeil de Boeuf, hath an alchemy whereby he will extract the third nettle and call it rent. ~ Carlyle

  14. #13
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,874

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    Quote Originally Posted by Rojo
    The thing of it is that Wayne thought this trade helped this year and in future years.
    I prefer my mediocrity all in one lump sum.

  15. #14
    Churlish Johnny Footstool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Olathe, KS
    Posts
    13,782

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    Quote Originally Posted by Nugget
    You say the trade may be better on paper but you quote the stats as being a measure of performance. The stats are the paper the results are the performance. FWIW Bray has contributed greatly to the success of the bullpen lately and Harris may be on his way to contributing to the REDS next year with BP in the middle infield.
    "Better on paper" means that the names look more palatable when you see them on the roster. On paper, Majewski is better than Yan for a number of reasons -- performance in the recent past, age, etc.

    On the field, however, Majewski has been every bit as bad as Yan was for the Reds, so his performance hasn't helped the team.

    BTW - You say Bray has "contributed greatly" to the success of the bullpen lately. What has he contributed besides a 4.40 ERA and 26 baserunners in 14.1 innings?
    "I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful

  16. #15
    Where's my chair? REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    20,902

    Re: Kearns and Lopez

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Footstool

    BTW - You say Bray has "contributed greatly" to the success of the bullpen lately. What has he contributed besides a 4.40 ERA and 26 baserunners in 14.1 innings?
    When Bray was acquired, either Wayne or Narron said he was valuable since he could be used vs lefties or righties. Yet, despite Bray being relatively fresh ( last appearances: 0 IP Aug 15 and 2 Ip on Aug 13), Narron still runs out Ryan Franklin tonight in a tie game.

    That's the tragedy of this season. Wayne has brought in all these bullpen arms, yet outside of Guaradado, Narron doesn't seem to have much confidence in the new comers. Well, I guess Narron did have misplaced confidence in Franklin.. :thumbdown Coffey and Weathers seem to Narron's "money" guys before the 9th. Bray seems to have fallen out of favor, but maybe that's only temporary.
    Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2010-2014!

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25