Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: BP mention of Travis Wood

  1. #1
    Charlie Brown All-Star IslandRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    4,838

    BP mention of Travis Wood

    In a Kevin Goldstein article, ranking his top 15 left-handed starters in the minors. Nothing really new here:

    http://www.baseballprospectus.com/ar...articleid=5434 (BP premium article)

    14. Travis Wood, Reds

    Age: 19.5 H/9: 7.66 BB/9: 3.63 K/9: 9.24

    A second-round pick out of an Arkansas high school last year, Wood's pro debut last year bordered on stunning as he struck out 67 in 49 innings while allowing just 28 hits. Wood has two very good pitches in a 91-94 mph fastball and a plus-plus changeup, but he's also a bit on the small side and extremely raw when it comes to his mechanics and the lack of a useable breaking pitch. The progress he makes with his curveball will define his future role, and his development will require patience.
    Not all who wander are lost

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member New Fever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    772

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    Remember Travis Wood put up big numbers last year and now Clayton Kershaw puts up big numbers and he is already the second best lefty in the minors. The Dodgers system gets overrated just like the Yankees.

  4. #3
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,107

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    No, Clayton Kershaw is that good.

  5. #4
    Member Superdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,779

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    Remember Travis Wood put up big numbers last year and now Clayton Kershaw puts up big numbers and he is already the second best lefty in the minors
    Don't be jealous. Just be happy that we have 3 very good pitching prospects that can't even legally drink yet!

  6. #5
    Member New Fever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    772

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    No I'm not saying anything bad about Kershaw I'm just saying they have him already above guys who have produced at higher levels already. I think he is very good though.

  7. #6
    Member New Fever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    772

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    This article also makes you think about how good it would have been to have the 6th or 7th pick. Right now it looks like the draft had some special arms.

  8. #7
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,125

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    We had Lincecum too, oh wait............
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  9. #8
    Lover of Trivialities Doc. Scott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Portland, OR (West Chester, OH)
    Posts
    6,091

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    Wood's consistency has suffered in the past month-plus, but he did manage six pretty darn good innings tonight.

    I generally do agree, though, that his load needs some lightening. He's now pitched 120 innings in his first full season.

    And now Dayton's largely out of the playoff hunt at 3.5 games away from that last spot.

  10. #9
    Member Superdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,779

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    but he's also a bit on the small side and extremely raw when it comes to his mechanics and the lack of a useable breaking pitch.
    What's wrong with his delivery? He looked a little jerky in his draft video, but he seemed to have his mechanics smoothed out this year.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    146

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    I think Woods problem is that he is an all effort pitcher. That is an even bigger problem down the road because he is very small in stature. However, from some reports it seems that they have Wood throwing a little smoother (hitting 91-93, instead of 95).

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    768

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    How small is he? And how small is too small? Just a cursory glance through some rosters show the following: Oswalt is 6-0. Backe is 6-0. Santana is 6-0. Pedro is 5-11.

    For the past 20 yrs the Reds have seemingly relied on the looks quotient. That hasn't worked. Let's go with the results. So long as the kid is getting people out, I don't see the problem.

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    146

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    He is 6'0, but he is also 160 pounds which is another problem. For every small pitcher that succeeded. Handfuls flamed out.

  14. #13
    Member Superdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,779

    Re: BP mention of Travis Wood

    I think Woods problem is that he is an all effort pitcher. That is an even bigger problem down the road because he is very small in stature.
    His delivery looked pretty effortless when I watched him on TV. Like I said, he went all "oswalt" in his draft video, but he seems to have toned it down this season.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25