Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Age Old Debate

  1. #1
    2009: Fail Ltlabner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    7,441

    Age Old Debate

    If you had to chose between the two players described below, who would you rather have on your team? I'm not talking about a whole team made up of these players, just the one. The heart of the question is the age old issue: tallent or effort.

    A) A modertaley tallented player with projected low top out on success BUT he has Pete Rose-eqsue drive, is there earley and stays late every day and absorbs what the coach/trainers tell him. When you look up "driven" in the dictonary you'll see his picture there.

    OR

    B) A mega-tallented super stud with gifts, skill and game galore. They "project" to be wicked successfull on the ballfield. BUT, he has horrible work ethic, is surly, has a primia-donna attitude and has to be catered to so he'll be coaxed out on the field.

    So it's the age old debate, tallent or effort?
    Last edited by Ltlabner; 08-31-2006 at 02:48 PM.
    a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude.

    I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Manliness Personified HumnHilghtFreel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,690

    Re: Age Old Debate

    If I could clone Ryan Freel 8 times I would. You have to love the guys that go out and give it their absolute all every single minute they're on the field.

    At the same time though, having a ton of effort isn't always going to win you ballgames. There has to be a perfect infusion of talent and hard work. I think if you had a team that was majority column A, then one or two of the column B prima-donnas could be stomached.

    Hard work gets you there, but talent pushes you up over that edge.

    So I guess my answer is situational. But if I was starting a team though, I would take the guy that's going to work his butt off every day.

  4. #3
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    11,168

    Re: Age Old Debate

    Yes.

    Okay, a team is a collection of individuals. You need some of each. If you look at the BRM, you see guys who were boppers (Bench, Perez, Foster), the guy who hustled (Rose), power and speed (Morgan, Griffey), light hitting defensive specialists (Concepcion & Geronimo).

    You have a good bench. In both '75 and '76, you had some terrific guys coming off the bench.

    Look at the make-up of the 1990 WS Championship team. Also a mix of player types.

    And pitching - not sexy, dominant pitching, but good "meat and potatoes" pitching. Nobody who was up around twenty wins, but a number of guys who can get your 12-15 wins.

    This team has starters with that type of balance and ability overall. I like our starters next year, assume Phillips slides over to short and we fill the 2nd base slot. I like the balance with some of our platoons (Aurilia, Freel). We need consistancy and maybe some shaping up to last the long, long season.

    But my "yes" means you need both and more.

  5. #4
    Yay!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Middletown, Ohio
    Posts
    7,430

    Re: Age Old Debate

    Both?
    When all is said and done more is said than done.

  6. #5
    2009: Fail Ltlabner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    7,441

    Re: Age Old Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by dabvu2498 View Post
    Both?

    You're needy........ :
    a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude.

    I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate

  7. #6
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,793

    Re: Age Old Debate

    I'll take the talent. I love the Rose's and Freel's of the world as much as anybody, but there are lots of those that never make it. The talented guy can always grow-up like a Gary Scheffield did or they can be good anyway like Albert Belle.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25