Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

  1. #1
    Member 15fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    5,504

    Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    from my 9/30/06 AJC:

    By DAVID O'BRIEN
    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

    Published on: 09/30/06

    Skeptics said he was too small to be a major leaguer, and he proved them wrong.

    They said his defense would never be good enough for the majors, and he proved them wrong.

    They said he wasn't a prototypical leadoff hitter, and he ... proved them right.

    Marcus Giles' first season as a leadoff hitter for the Braves could be his last — his last season as a leadoff hitter, and his last season with the Braves.

    The 28-year-old second baseman could see his salary rise from this year's $3.85 million to more than $5 million in his final year of arbitration, before he's eligible for free agency after the 2007 season.

    The salary, along with his marketability and reluctance to embrace the leadoff role, are all factors that put him at the top of the list of Braves most likely to be traded this winter — just ahead of Andruw Jones, who is also eligible for free agency after the 2007 season.

    "I feel like it could go either way," Giles said of being traded. "But obviously I've never been anything but 100 percent sure that I was coming back. So being 50-50 now is an awkward position to be in.

    "It is a little bit of an uncomfortable feeling, something I hadn't anticipated feeling. But at the same time, it is part of the game, so there's no sense in getting upset about it."

    Giles hit .265 with 45 extra-base hits, 10 stolen bases and 59 RBIs before Friday, including just .253 with a .337 on-base percentage in 459 at-bats as a leadoff man.

    This after he hit .291 with 64 extra-base hits last season, .311 in 2004 and .316 with 72 extra-base hits (21 homers) and 69 RBIs in 2003.

    The Braves might trim salary at one or two positions to pay increases on the pitching staff and elsewhere. If Giles is dealt, the Braves haven't decided if a replacement would come from within the organization or via trade or free agency.

    The free-agent class is thin on second basemen, and a trade seems more likely if an outsider is to replace him. If the Braves look inward, rookie Martin Prado and Willy Aybar have shown enough to warrant consideration for the second base job, but Aybar might be slotted as the backup for oft-injured third baseman Chipper Jones.

    Aybar has hit .292 with 26 doubles, five homers and a .388 on-base percentage in 325 at-bats in two seasons with the Dodgers and Braves, including .333 with a .425 OBP in 144 at-bats as a leadoff man.

    Giles was asked if his chances of staying might be greater had he performed better in the leadoff role.

    "I'm sure it would've helped," he said, "but I just think one of the biggest things this offense is lacking is a true, good leadoff hitter. Obviously I'm not the guy for that job. I've known that since January."

    The Braves were left without a leadoff man after Rafael Furcal signed a three-year, $39 million free-agent contract with the Dodgers last winter, the Los Angeles proposal dwarfing offers he received from the Braves and Cubs. Furcal hit .301 with 15 homers, 37 stolen bases and a .371 on-base percentage before Friday.

    He was quickly replaced in December when the Braves traded for shortstop Edgar Renteria, who had thrived most of his career in the No. 2 spot. Giles prefers the No. 2 spot and had excelled in it for three seasons.

    The Braves decided Giles would be adequate to replace Furcal in the leadoff spot for one season, figuring a player with a .292 career average before this season, and a .366 on-base percentage and high extra-base hits totals, could offset a lack of stolen bases and a strikeouts-to-walks ratio that was atypical for a No. 1 hitter.

    What the Braves didn't count on was Giles missing part of spring training for a family matter, and missing nearly 20 games with several nagging injuries, including the hand injury that had him out of Friday's lineup.

    They never expected Giles would get off to such a poor start in April – .192 average, one homer, four RBIs – that it only added to his frustrations in the leadoff role. It also foretold a streaky season of highs and lows.

    He has been something of a contradiction in his stance on the leadoff job, several times reiterating he wasn't happy in the job and didn't want to get comfortable in the role, while always adding that he wouldn't complain and would make the best of the situation because the Braves didn't have any better options.

    Braves officials won't say if Giles will be back next season. But they are dealing with payroll restrictions, and most other high-salaried players are either too valuable and affordable (John Smoltz) to trade, or have big contracts (Mike Hampton, Chipper Jones to a lesser extent) that make them difficult or impossible to move if the Braves wanted to do so. In Chipper Jones' case, they've given no indication of wanting to trade him.

    ..........

    So Giles isn't a leadoff man. Fine.

    For 2007, he'd fit the bill nicely at 2nd and allow Phillips to slide over to SS.

    If the Reds contend in 2007, Giles is part of it. If not, shop him at the deadline. Or sit on him and then let him walk as a FA & take the comp picks.

    As far as who the Reds could deal, I'll leave that up to the trade folks around here. I'll throw out that the Braves, like everyone else, will be looking for starting pitching this offseason. Perhaps the expanded dimensions of Turner Field would be more forgiving on someone like Eric Milton...

    Edit: It's also worth noting that Giles & his wife also had a child early in the season. There were some complications with either the birth or the early days thereafter, which would perhaps partially explain why Giles put up some substandard numbers in 2006.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    534

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    I definitely like Giles and think he would be a good addition.

  4. #3
    Member OnBaseMachine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    34,844

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    Count me in as one who would love to have him.

  5. #4
    Puffy's Daddy Red Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    20,422

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    I've mentioned him previously on this board as a player to target this offseason. It is believed that the Braves are not only looking for starting pitching, but for relief pitching as well. Specifically, the Braves mentioned that they would like to get a decent setup guy in their bullpen for Giles and NOT have to throw any money in when trading Giles.

    Not throwing any money in for a 3rd year arbitration eligible 2B? That's fine, meet Mr. Majewski.

    Seriously, I bet they'd take it. Remember the Kevin Millwood trade to the Phils?
    'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.'
    -Snoop on his retirement

    Your Mom is happy.

  6. #5
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,979

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    I like Giles, too, but tread carefully. He's something of an injury risk, and at age 28, no longer a spring chicken.

  7. #6
    This one's for you Edd Heath's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Dayton Area
    Posts
    8,471

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    I like Giles, too, but tread carefully. He's something of an injury risk, and at age 28, no longer a spring chicken.
    There are darkening skies gathering above...so I must be agreeing with FCB.

    He's going to have some upside and potential - but he'll be walking after this year if he goes nuts.

    I think it's going to take more then Majewski to get it done - probably Coffey and Pelland IMO.
    Some people play baseball. Baseball plays Jay Bruce.

  8. #7
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,297

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    I think he might have had some pharmaceutical help when he was at his peak.

  9. #8
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,979

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    Quote Originally Posted by edabbs44 View Post
    I think he might have had some pharmaceutical help when he was at his peak.
    It's my pet theory, too. But I genuinely have nothing to substantiate that.

  10. #9
    Puffy's Daddy Red Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    20,422

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    Quote Originally Posted by edabbs44 View Post
    I think he might have had some pharmaceutical help when he was at his peak.
    I don't believe that. Obviously, I have no proof, but I find that hard to believe. He has had various injuries that have cost him a couple weeks (and more) each of the last 3-4 seasons. And as someone already mentioned, the family stuff he went through in spring traiing this year had to be devestating to him. I think if you put him in a Reds uniform, and hit him 2nd, he leads the league in doubles and provides a lot opportunity for those behind him to drive him in. Now only if they could also get a speedy lead off CFer.

    Hmmm, come to think of it, I wouldn't be opposed to Freel playing CF everyday and hitting lead off if they acquired Giles.
    Last edited by Red Leader; 09-30-2006 at 11:56 AM.
    'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.'
    -Snoop on his retirement

    Your Mom is happy.

  11. #10
    Stat Wanker Hodiernus RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    16,021

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    I'd be very happy with Deno leading off and Giles 2nd and at 2B. The question is what it would take to get him. I have to imagine a lot of teams would be interested.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  12. #11
    Puffy's Daddy Red Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    20,422

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    I have to imagine a lot of teams would be interested.
    Other than San Francisco (who will probably let Durham walk--which takes one other team out of the sweeps for Giles)and St. Louis, I can't think of another team that might need a 2B next year. Adam Kennedy will be available as a free agent. Ronnie Belliard, too.
    'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.'
    -Snoop on his retirement

    Your Mom is happy.

  13. #12
    Where's my chair? REDREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    21,068

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    Quote Originally Posted by Heath View Post
    I think it's going to take more then Majewski to get it done - probably Coffey and Pelland IMO.
    If that's all it would take, I do that trade, and I like Coffey.

    Of course, that's contingent upon Cast being willing to spend the money to at least attempt to sign him long term.

    If Giles is just going to be a one year rental, forget it, because we aren't likely to contend next year, even with Giles.
    Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2010-2014!

    Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!

  14. #13
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    The Reds don't have much to trade. I could only see Giles in a Cincy uniform if there is almost no market for his services. He would certainly be a nice pickup but only at the right price.
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  15. #14
    Puffy's Daddy Red Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    20,422

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ricardo Cabesa View Post
    The Reds don't have much to trade. I could only see Giles in a Cincy uniform if there is almost no market for his services. He would certainly be a nice pickup but only at the right price.
    I'm still of the opinion that there won't be much demand for a 2B this offseason. I've thought of all of the teams in baseball and I can't think of more than 2-3 that could really use a 2B for next year, especially at the $4.5-5.5M Giles will likely get with his arbitration raise. That bodes well for the Reds if they plan on shifting Phillips over to SS.

    As far as Giles goes, if they did make a trade and could get him on a 2 yr / $8.0M contract with a mutual option for a third, that'd be a good deal, IMO.
    Last edited by Red Leader; 10-02-2006 at 05:20 PM.
    'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.'
    -Snoop on his retirement

    Your Mom is happy.

  16. #15
    Member klw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    6,424

    Re: Buying Low This Offseason: Marcus Giles?

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Leader View Post
    Other than San Francisco (who will probably let Durham walk--which takes one other team out of the sweeps for Giles)and St. Louis, I can't think of another team that might need a 2B next year. Adam Kennedy will be available as a free agent. Ronnie Belliard, too.
    And Mark Loretta


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25