Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

  1. #1
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,722

    Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    Jamie Moyer signed a 2 year extension worth $10.5 Million.

    Moyer will be 44 years old next opening day, his ERA was still ok (below 4.40), he gives up homers and is now in a homer park.

    I'm not really surprised because I think the market is through the roof for starters. More than we've seen so far. I am surprised by 2 years. It could mean:

    - $3.5 Million may not be so far out of line for Lohse. (I don't really want the Reds to keep Lohse for that, but there may be a trade market for him.)

    - Milton could probably be traded during the season with whatever is left on his contract moved and something in return. (Not now because of the surgery.)

    - A desireable pitcher will probably cost big, big bucks. If Moyer were 10 years younger he would command more than Milton money and I think it will take at least that to get anyone we might even marginally want. Top 5 or 6 guys will get over $10 Million per year IMO.

    - Guys like Ramirez and Claussen may have more value than we think and might be able to bring a decent position prospect (SS?) If they prove they are healthy. They might fetch a somewhat pricey veteran or a price increasing young veteran with some flaws (sort of like Lopez was).

    Not much of this is new, but this signing adds evidence to what we've been suspecting.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    11,126

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    It's getting to the point with some of these pitchers that they'll be able retire to their baseball pension AND their social security! How many guys in their
    40's are still pitching?

    And I hope Julio Franco just keeps going - the last guy still playing born in the same decade as me! And he shows no signs of stopping. Minnie Minosa (and Satcel Paige) aside, the oldest players have played to age 49. I wonder if Franco will make it to 50.

  4. #3
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    An indication that no start pitching will be cheap in the upcoming free agent market, in fact, it will be way overpriced.
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  5. #4
    Brett William Moore Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Crescent Springs KY
    Posts
    3,589

    as I said

    decent guys like Lilly, Padilla, Ohka are going to be grossly overpaid.

    letting Lohse go and signing a free agent #3 SP is going to cost $$$ and could bite the Reds for years ( Pavano, Jared Wright, Milton, Chan Ho Park, etc etc etc )

    IF ( a big IF ) the Reds could trade Dunn for quality young major league or AAA pitching they should do it. Hitters are much cheaper to get on the free agent market than pitchers

  6. #5
    Stat Wanker Hodiernus RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    15,910

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    I'd give Loshe a 2 mil base with performance incentives with million dollar bumps at 100, 130, 160, and 200 IP to make it attractive and then a mutual option for 2008. He's got some good stuff, he's just horribly inconsistent with it. I'd much rather take a 1 year flier on him than overspend on somebody else.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  7. #6
    Member dunner13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    607

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    I'd give Loshe a 2 mil base with performance incentives with million dollar bumps at 100, 130, 160, and 200 IP to make it attractive and then a mutual option for 2008. He's got some good stuff, he's just horribly inconsistent with it. I'd much rather take a 1 year flier on him than overspend on somebody else.
    That would mean if he throws 200 innings he gets 6 million. Seems a little high to me. How about half million increases which would put him at 4 million if he made 200 innings. With our rotation you could pitch 200 innings and have an era of 5.00 Which to me would not make him a 6 million dollar pitcher.

  8. #7
    Posting in Dynarama M2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    28,159

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    Trade is defintely the avenue the Reds will need to pursue to find new pitchers. The good news is their rotation is anchored by two guys acquired for Jose Guillen and Wily Mo Pena. You don't have to denude your club for arms if you have a discerning eye.
    Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

    I'm witchcrafting everybody.

  9. #8
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    Quote Originally Posted by M2 View Post
    Trade is defintely the avenue the Reds will need to pursue to find new pitchers.
    and be patient and develop your own. The free agent market for starters is nothing but fools gold for a small market team. You end up spending way too much money for bad pitchers.

    Reds are better off hoping to catch a little bit lightning from Belisle, Ramirez, etc than they are throwing a money at free agents that would be in their price range.
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  10. #9
    Danger is my business! oneupper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Back in Florida
    Posts
    8,142

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    I'd give Loshe a 2 mil base with performance incentives with million dollar bumps at 100, 130, 160, and 200 IP to make it attractive and then a mutual option for 2008. He's got some good stuff, he's just horribly inconsistent with it. I'd much rather take a 1 year flier on him than overspend on somebody else.
    Isn't Lohse arbitration-eligible? He's already making $4 mm, so he's guaranteed $3.2 mm if he's offered arbitration. Unlikely he gets much less than $4 mm in arbitration anyway.
    He'd be silly to sign a incentive-laden contract like that one, risk getting injured and giving up a lot of money.

    The alternative is letting him go. Once the REDS see what the FA SP are commanding, that won't be an option either.

    REDS will sign him for 1 year at $4 mm with an option for 2008 (with a buyout). I'm not saying that's what I like, but that's what I think will happen.

    Pray he pitches well.
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

    http://dalmady.blogspot.com

  11. #10
    Brett William Moore Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Crescent Springs KY
    Posts
    3,589

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    " The alternative is letting him go. Once the REDS see what the FA SP are commanding, that won't be an option either. "

    as I said in a different thread there is no guarantee that Lilly, Eaton,Padilla,Ohka,etc will be any better than Lohse in 2007 and some of them will be getting $30,000,000 over 3 years. yikes

  12. #11
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,722

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    Reds could sign Lohse for $4 Million and trade him for a reliever with closer stuff (but not an established closer) or some other non-starting pitcher need, and go with Milton, Lizard and Claussen with Belisle as an alternative and Bailey allowing a Milton trade by July.

    If Bailey is 75% of what he projects to be, a top 3 of Bailey, Harang and Arroyo is probably the best top 3 in the division by 2008. Cueto and Wood will be on the verge by then as well and I like Lizard as a #5. I know this is not what people are used to, but for the long term, starting pitching is not this team's biggest problem. This assumes that Arroyo can be kept around a while. This doesn't mean we should stop adding quality arms by the way. It does mean that there should not be a panic move to sign a #3 or 4 caliber guy for $10 Million/year.

  13. #12
    Lark11 11BarryLarkin11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    244

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    Personally, I don't think Moyer's contract has any implications for free agent pitching at all.

    He's signed to about $5M per season, which is far from expensive. In fact, it could be considered a bargain for a lefthanded starting pitcher with 6+ years of service time who annually pitches 200+ innings a year. His contract doesn't exactly explode the free agent market for starting pitchers. There is a long list of terrible contracts for free agent starting pitchers over the past few years.

    For example:
    Odalis Perez (2007: $7.75M)
    Kris Benson (2007: $7.5M)
    Jaret Wright (2007: $7M)
    Carl Pavano (2007: $10M)
    Eric Milton (2007:$9M)
    Matt Clement (2007: $9.5M)

    And, that's just the tip of the iceberg and it's not likely to get better any time soon, as the average MLB salary has gone up about 10% per year over the past decade or so. So, you're definitely preaching to the choir when you say that free agent pitching isn't a good value. The production you get per dollar spent doesn't justify the the contracts they receive. It's a much more cost effective philosophy to focus on acquiring pitchers who has less than 6 years of service time, when the production per dollar spent ratio is far more attractive.

    As for Kyle Lohse, he made $3.95M in 2006. And, despite some atrocious seasons in the past, he has yet to lose an arbitration hearing. So, if the Reds want to bring him back, it seems very likely that he'll cost at least $4M. I think he'll get at least that in arbitration, so I see no reason for him to sign a contract that would result in a pay cut. Personally, I don't think he's worth it, but given that we gave up Zach Ward to get him, I'd be very surprised if we don't bring him back.

    Anyway, just my $.02.

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,736

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    Lohse has very poor trade value IMO

  15. #14
    The Big Dog mth123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,722

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    I think a 44 year old getting two guaranteed years says something about the market. That basically says they are willing to go $10 Million for this year because next year he will likely be nothing. He didn't pitch well in Seattle and was helped by the park.

  16. #15
    Lark11 11BarryLarkin11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    244

    Re: Jamie Moyer Contract Implications

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    I think a 44 year old getting two guaranteed years says something about the market. That basically says they are willing to go $10 Million for this year because next year he will likely be nothing. He didn't pitch well in Seattle and was helped by the park.
    I agree that he was aided by Safeco, but Moyer is still a solid pitcher. He's thrown 200+ innings in 8 of the past 9 seasons and for Philly last year he had a 4.03 ERA and a 1.09 WHIP in 51.1 innings. So, despite his age, I don't see any evidence of him slowing down. I'd be very surprised if the Phillies weren't counting on solid production out of Moyer in both 2007 and 2008. And, I think he can give it to them.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25