The Reds are making (another) curious move. They seem set against a move of Phillips to SS. Putting Phillips at SS would remove a major need (that has very scarce options) from the shopping list and allow the Reds to choose from multiple options at 2B giving them much more selectivity and leverage for adding or utilizing the players who best fit the offensive needs. It might also be an upgrade at 2B depending on who is brought in. As well as Phillips played at 2B, he really was nothing special turning the DP and his range, hands, etc, would seem just as (or more) valuable at SS.
There are multiple options to capably man 2B. They could bring Aurilia back, sign Kennedy, Loretta, Belliard, etc. or just split time with Freel and Harris.
Making Phillips the fixture at 2B also keeps Freel in the OF and w/o IF time he is really devalued IMO. Harris becomes a non-entity. Phillips would have more value as an accomplished SS than as a 2B. Keeping him at 2B seems to be removing value from all 3 players who figure to be on next year's roster.
Given how much this would seem to make sense, and how against it the Reds seem to be, I have to conclude that the Reds really don't like the idea of Phillips at SS.
Anyone know why? Do they love him at 2B so much that they don't want to move him? Do they think he can't play SS? Is his arm too weak? Is it just a negotiating ploy for getting Richie back for less money (seems strange if it is)? Do they want a proven vet playing next to EE?
I just can't figure it out.