Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Instant Replay, anyone?

  1. #1
    Reds and 26.2's
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Gastonia, NC
    Posts
    651

    Instant Replay, anyone?

    Discussion is heating up among the GM's..

    Does baseball need instant replay?

    What's next..a computer that calls balls and strikes? Or worse yet, a batter to hit for the pitcher?


    The times, they are a'changin..

    http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/a...2006&fext=.jsp

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    13,450

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    For the last few years, MLB's focus has been on making the games faster. Anyone who has ever watched a football game come to a grinding halt as the officials watch a replay knows that adding replay is not going to make the games go any faster.

    "What's next..a computer that calls balls and strikes?"

    I know you posted this in jest because of the context, but Questec should be at the top of the list of any effort at making the game go faster, since it would eliminate the time spent arguing (and time-consuming ejections associated with arguing) balls and strikes.

  4. #3
    Reds and 26.2's
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Gastonia, NC
    Posts
    651

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unassisted View Post
    For the last few years, MLB's focus has been on making the games faster. Anyone who has ever watched a football game come to a grinding halt as the officials watch a replay knows that adding replay is not going to make the games go any faster.

    "What's next..a computer that calls balls and strikes?"

    I know you posted this in jest because of the context, but Questec should be at the top of the list of any effort at making the game go faster, since it would eliminate the time spent arguing (and time-consuming ejections associated with arguing) balls and strikes.

    I guess I'm just a sucker for the old fashioned game of baseball..Why does it need to be faster?

    The strategies that the game were developed on are slowly being taken away. Part of the game belongs to the human umpire and the chance that he might be human for 9 innings...And if he does make a mistake? Seeing an irate manager crash out of the dugout to "discuss" his humanity is just as fun to a baseball fan as a leadoff triple..

    At least to this baseball fan...
    Last edited by FlyingPig; 11-15-2006 at 09:38 PM.

  5. #4
    Danger is my business! oneupper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Back in Florida
    Posts
    8,155

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    An automated strike zone is definitely the way to go if you want to make umpiring "fair".

    More games are won and lost on the ball/strike count than on foul/fair homers or outs on the bases (which is what replay would probably look at).
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

    http://dalmady.blogspot.com

  6. #5
    post hype sleeper cincinnati chili's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    10,840

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by oneupper View Post
    An automated strike zone is definitely the way to go if you want to make umpiring "fair".

    More games are won and lost on the ball/strike count than on foul/fair homers or outs on the bases (which is what replay would probably look at).
    I agree. I'd like to see both changes made soon. However, I'm skeptical that we'll get automated balls/strikes in my lifetime.
    ". . . acquiring J. Blanton from Oakland for, apparently, Bailey/Cueto, Votto and a lesser prospect. I do it in a second . . . The Reds' equation this year is simple: Make Matt Belisle your #3 starter . . . trade for Blanton, win 85 or more, be in the mix all summer." - Paul Daugherty, Feb. 8, 2008

  7. #6
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    13,450

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingPig View Post
    I guess I'm just a sucker for the old fashioned game of baseball..Why does it need to be faster?
    TV wants it to be faster. And it's TV money that pays most of the bills and salaries.

  8. #7
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    34,437

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unassisted View Post
    TV wants it to be faster. And it's TV money that pays most of the bills and salaries.

    That's true but they only want it to be so fast. 2 1/2 hours-3 hours is good but anything over that I'm sure they have problems with.
    The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160

  9. #8
    You know his story Redsland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    7,714

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    I don't mind the idea. It sure would've helped us when that drive bounced out of the basket in Chicago for a "double."
    Makes all the routine posts.

  10. #9
    Danger is my business! oneupper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Back in Florida
    Posts
    8,155

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by cincinnati chili View Post
    I agree. I'd like to see both changes made soon. However, I'm skeptical that we'll get automated balls/strikes in my lifetime.
    I'm 46. With the advances in technology I've seen so far in my lifetime, I would be disappointed if it (auto ball/strike) DIDNT happen before I'm gone.

    But what do I know. I thought the DH wouldn't last.
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

    http://dalmady.blogspot.com

  11. #10
    ZCTRMTP!!!!! texasdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,807

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    If they want to speed up baseball they could institute the 'Sean Casey' rule.
    No explanation necessary.

  12. #11
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by texasdave View Post
    If they want to speed up baseball they could institute the 'Sean Casey' rule.
    No explanation necessary.
    To be fair from both sides of the plate, they should call it the Casey/Garciaparra rule.

  13. #12
    You know his story Redsland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    7,714

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    There is a rule on the books about that, but I've never seen it enforced.

    I know that umps talked to the players about it during spring training two years ago. Sean cut back a bit on his intra-pitch OCD-athon as a result.
    Makes all the routine posts.

  14. #13
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    34,437

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by texasdave View Post
    If they want to speed up baseball they could institute the 'Sean Casey' rule.
    No explanation necessary.

    Call me crazy, but if he hugs everyone before each AB, that's going to slow down the game more.
    The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160

  15. #14
    Be the ball Roy Tucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Mason, OH
    Posts
    12,170

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    I've always thought a manager ought to have 1 challenge per game on things like HRs, safe/out calls on bases, tags, balls trapped by fielders, etc. Not balls/strikes, balks, etc.

    The umps would look at the TV feed. Toyed with the idea of having a penalty (like 1 out) if the challenge doesn't overturn the call.

    Pay attention to the open sky

  16. #15
    Hey Cubs Fans RFS62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    16,601

    Re: Instant Replay, anyone?

    It will be a happy day for me when they call balls and strikes electronically.
    "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
    ~ Mark Twain


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25