“And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.” Jamie Galbraith
The problem with Hatt is, he is old and hasn't put together 2 decent years running. He is also probably going to be injury prone. Griffey is injury prone to and a move to RF won't change that. They need another stick with pop in it and Votto can provide that, thus he is such a huge key. Lineup construction may be important, but so is power.
Considering the Reds still are looking for another starter and a closer, not much money is left for the bats. Votto probably is a key player in Krivsky's mind if the current offseason progression continues and Krivsky did say he was "impressed" with Votto's raw power................
The problem that I see is that even if Hat repeats he doesn't give the offense what it needs. BTW Hat's slugging starting in 1998:
.446, .375, .435, .345, .433, .383, .420, .343, .436.
I can't say the pattern really means anything, but my expectations fit the pattern. Maybe a stat guru has an explanation.
I could grab a mess of worst ones, I'll start with 1936, 50 years later was no great shakes eitherOriginally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
The Reds' infield next season could be one of the absolute worst in Reds' history viz. offense (when you factor the almost-certain collapses of Hatteberg/Ross and the almost-certain jettisoning of Aurilia).
Code:PLAYER G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG SLG OBA OPS Lew Riggs 141 538 69 138 20 12 6 57 38 33 5 0 .257 .372 .314 .686 Les Scarsella 115 485 63 152 21 9 3 65 14 36 6 0 .313 .412 .335 .748 Alex Kampouris 122 355 43 85 10 4 5 46 24 46 3 0 .239 .332 .289 .622 Billy Myers 98 323 45 87 9 6 6 27 28 56 6 0 .269 .390 .328 .718 PLAYER G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG SLG OBA OPS Buddy Bell 155 568 89 158 29 3 20 75 73 49 2 8 .278 .445 .362 .807 Ron Oester 153 523 52 135 23 2 8 44 52 84 9 2 .258 .356 .325 .680 Nick Esasky 102 330 35 76 17 2 12 41 47 97 0 2 .230 .403 .325 .728 Dave Concepcion 90 311 42 81 13 2 3 30 26 43 13 2 .260 .344 .314 .658 Kurt Stillwell 104 279 31 64 6 1 0 26 30 47 6 2 .229 .258 .309 .567 Pete Rose 72 237 15 52 8 2 0 25 30 31 3 0 .219 .270 .316 .586 Barry Larkin 41 159 27 45 4 3 3 19 9 21 8 0 .283 .403 .320 .722
Some comments from SOSH posters since the Red Sox had Gonzalez last season and know all about him. From the comments I've read in the thread pasted below - and the comments I read in the Gold Glove thread when Jeter won it over Gonzalez - most Red Sox fans seemed to love Gonzalez's defensive abilities while hating his offensive game, and none of that is too terribly surprising given what we already know about Gonzalez.
BTW, Gonzalez was a Type B free agent and Boston will receive a sandwich draft pick in compensation. The signing will not cost the Reds a draft pick.
http://sonsofsamhorn.net/index.php?showtopic=12999&st=0
Originally Posted by Jay A ZeeOriginally Posted by GriffinDoerrOriginally Posted by BongorificOriginally Posted by Who is Dana WilliamsOriginally Posted by Rough CarriganOriginally Posted by Clears Cleaver
The Lost Decade Average Season: 74-88
2014-22 Average Season: 71-91
he filled a hole with a plug, that sums it up for me.
“And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.” Jamie Galbraith
Narron had Deno batting leadoff at the end of the year consistantly. That isn't a issue and even Gary Jerry Narron couldn't mess that up.............
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |