Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

  1. #16
    part of BBN jmac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    2,309

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    Quote Originally Posted by NJReds View Post
    I think signing Zito for $15M+ year for 5-7 years is crazy anyway.
    i dont know if you referring to zito inparticular or just the contract.

    1= the contract in general......yes , the prices are out of sight. however i remember when i bought my first car, gas was 69 cents a gallon(around 1985). now we are at 2.15+ . sometimes sliding down a few cents only going back several cents later. will we ever see the 69 cents again ? i doubt it.
    Yeah....they say the "cost of living" thing.

    So as far as the contracts.. but till something changes, to get the type A free agent , we will have to pay it or set on the sidelines.

    2= Zito....well he is a Type A free agent in my opinion.
    However, it would not surprise me in the least for Harang to have a better ERA this upcoming season.
    so would zito be worth it ? he is the best out there right now.

    Main point= lock up Harang, wayne k. The prices are up there now and they are only going higher.
    because of injury history...if Harang was on the market today...i would want him over schmidt. Give him a nice raise and keep him a Red.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    5,985

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    I believe BCast when he says he's willing to move out a little bit, but there is always gonna be another team willing to move out a little bit more.

    The Yanks and other big market teams have a much larger margin for error. If the Reds make a gamble move like Milton and miss, they're stuck and it binds up the roster for years. If the Yanks make a Milton or Pavano (etc.)-like signing, so what? They just go out and sign a Mussina, a Clemmons or a Zito and bury the mistake in middle-relief until the contract runs out or they throw in some cash and/or one of their over-rated prospects to get them off their hands.

    I actually kinda feel sorry for the FO. I believe the money and the "want to" are there to make this team better. A lack-luster FA crop, ridiculously over-inflated market prices and few, if any, trading chips of any value whatsoever severly limit what they can actually accomplish though.

    I, for one, will be greatly impressed if it's much at all. In fact, I've actually reached the point where I'll be relieved if they make it through the offseason without one or two Miltonesque disasters just because they get frustrated and want to have something (anything) to show.
    Last edited by corkedbat; 12-02-2006 at 10:56 AM.

  4. #18
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,979

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    No one seemed to mind a bit when, seven years ago, the FO thought it was a good idea to spend 116 million to bring in an outfielder with bad knees (which were public knowledge at the time of the trade). But a top-shelf pitcher going for less over a shorter period of time, and is a much more easily tradeable commodity, that's just a bad idea?

  5. #19
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    34,423

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    Quote Originally Posted by corkedbat View Post
    I believe BCast when he says he's willing to move out a little bit, but there is always gonna be another team willing to move out a little bit more.

    The Yanks and other big market teams have a much larger margin for error. If the Reds make a gamble move like Milton and miss, they're stuck and it binds up the roster for years.
    There's gambling and then there's hitting on 19. If I'm a Blackjack dealer and I see DanO at the table. I've got no worries cause I know he's going to hit on 19 then go back and play at the $5 table after he busts.

    Playing it safe is never going to get the Reds anywhere. But I don't want to see them just throwing money at someone just to prove they can do it to the fans and the media. I don't want to see them sign a Weaver or a Marquis to a 5 year deal for what Milton is making. But I would like to see them be players for someone who may put them over budget but would be worth it.
    The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160

  6. #20
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    11,179

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    No one seemed to mind a bit when, seven years ago, the FO thought it was a good idea to spend 116 million to bring in an outfielder with bad knees (which were public knowledge at the time of the trade). But a top-shelf pitcher going for less over a shorter period of time, and is a much more easily tradeable commodity, that's just a bad idea?
    And yet the irony is that most of Junior's injuries while with the Reds have been unrelated to his knees. I can't find the list, but I know the hamstring and at least one broken bone sent him to the DL during his time here. The long-term lock up of Griffey was at the time a good move. Fate has dealt some severe blows to that.

  7. #21
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,979

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    Quote Originally Posted by redsmetz View Post
    And yet the irony is that most of Junior's injuries while with the Reds have been unrelated to his knees. I can't find the list, but I know the hamstring and at least one broken bone sent him to the DL during his time here. The long-term lock up of Griffey was at the time a good move. Fate has dealt some severe blows to that.
    It wasn't a good move then; it isn't now. I said so at the time--way too many years on a hitter over thirty.

    I just think it's funny how the Griffey/Milton deals have made everybody gunshy.

    It's just interesting. But it's moot, the Reds aren't going after Zito, so everyone can rest easy that no real major pitching improvements are coming to Cincy this season from without.

    Cross your fingers and hope Bailey's ready.

  8. #22
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,795

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    No one seemed to mind a bit when, seven years ago, the FO thought it was a good idea to spend 116 million to bring in an outfielder with bad knees (which were public knowledge at the time of the trade). But a top-shelf pitcher going for less over a shorter period of time, and is a much more easily tradeable commodity, that's just a bad idea?
    At the time it was trumpeted as a home town deal as well, the market had exploded in the wake of the big offense build up. Griffey's RC/27 for 2000 season was the the 31st best in team history so the payback seemed good for a year. (BTW Dunn's 04 and 05 season are 24th and 40th best in modern team history)

    The years were the twist of the knife, that and hamstrings made of old rubber bands and cork.

  9. #23
    First Time Caller SunDeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Posts
    5,394

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    Quote Originally Posted by WVRedsFan View Post
    I sometimes think that all baseball people say the things that will make the fans come to the park...or the RedsFest, for that matter. If these quotes were totally accurate, we'd already have Barry Zito, a slugging outfielder and another starter. ain't gonna happen.
    Bob knows the quotes aren't just read by fans. He's got to talk to agents as well. After all, one of the things every FA wants is to play on a team that is trying to win. Let's just pretend he said this instead: "Well, we're pretty tapped out right now. Being a small market franchise means we just can't pony up the cash to stay competitive."
    Would that kind of candor make people happy?

    I'm guessing Bob has a lot of money. Hinting that he'll take some of it from the vegetable business to spend on the ballclub is a good move.
    Next Reds manager, second shooter. --Confirmed on Redszone.

  10. #24
    Member Spring~Fields's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    8,630

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    Quote Originally Posted by edabbs44 View Post
    WARNING...do not read if you don't want to hear negative thoughts.

    I will believe it when I see it. We've heard this before and I fell for it once already. I really hope he is telling the truth but I am not buying yet. The way WK and Bob are talking, you'd think they're gonna break the bank. All these quotes like "stay tuned" and "We don’t knock any possibility out of the realm of possibility, OK?", whatever the heck that means. As always, I'm taking these quotes with a:

    Castellini is not making any revelations here and not promising any grandiose changes. He is telling the fans that they can expect changes, but don't expect any huge player changes that will bring huge financial changes to the payroll budget.

    Mr. Castellini appears to be honest and reasonable when he communicates in a business and accounting manner. He is not exaggerating by telling the fans or implying to the fans that the Reds are going to make any large changes that would significantly increase the budget. He is not leading them to believe in some fantastic improvements to player personnel that the team cannot afford.

    The subject of Marc’s writing is “payroll flexibility”.
    Mr. Castellini said that there is a “little bit“, or “wiggle room” for payroll flexibility. Little or wiggle are adjectives meaning small.

    “Castellini insisted the Reds have some wiggle room with the remaining budget”

    Castellini is using accounting parlance in using the term budget. Budget means the plan for allocating resources: a plan specifying how resources, especially time or money, will be allocated or spent during a particular period.

    He is also being conservative or using conservatism in his use of generalities, conservative/conservatism cautious and on low side: cautiously moderate and therefore often less than the final outcome, is more accounting parlance, meaning, tendency to support gradual rather than abrupt change and to preserve the status quo.
    Payrolls are an “inexact” projection due to the volatility in payroll changes that occur during a fiscal year that is the “period” in accounting terms, they are not fixed as in fixed expenses, so he has to say, “there is no exactness”. They will change and vary within a given fiscal year for any business, but he has clearly told us in small increments by using the terms “wiggle room” and “little bit”, meaning small amounts.


    Points of reference:
    Accounting parlance -
    Parlance - particular way of talking: the style of speech or writing used by people in a particular context or profession.

    Budget - plan for allocating resources: a plan specifying how resources, especially time or money, will be allocated or spent during a particular period
    money for particular purpose: the total amount of money allocated or needed for a particular purpose or period of time
    plan spending: to plan the allocation, expenditure, or use of resources, especially money or time.

    Conservatism - tendency to support gradual rather than abrupt change and to preserve the status quo
    To support gradual, preserve the status quo - Thus Castellini says, “wiggle” or “little”.

    Conservative - cautious and on low side: cautiously moderate and therefore often less than the final outcome
    Less than the final outcome because the payroll budget will have variances or variations due to the nature of arbitration, certain other moves that the team may or may not make, and the components in those contracts that might come or go.

    “Little bit”
    Little - an adjective meaning "small"

    “Wiggle room”
    Wiggle - make small movements: to move side to side in small quick movements, or make something move in this way - example of little bit or wiggle room. Krivsky has been consistent with those terms as it is reported that he made 42 moves or trades, those were each small movements

    “Exactness correct“
    : accurate and correct in all important details
    precise: precise and not allowing for any variation.

    Payroll in contrast to:

    Fixed expense
    Not subject to change: not subject to change in amount or time

    Fixed cost - unchanging expense: a business expense that does not vary according to the amount of business

    He has to say “there is no exactness“, because the payroll is naturally not exact, he leaves that up to the fans for their open interpretation for the realm of possible large increases in payroll to improve the team.

    But he has said in fact just the opposite, he has said there is little, there is wiggle room, meaning small amounts, which does not equate to large improvements that cause substantive increases to the budget which is the plan for 2007.

    "Nothing’s out of the question," he said. "We don’t knock any possibility out of the realm of possibility, OK? We look at every possibility that’s going to make this team a better team."

    “We look at every possibility”

    Look - consider something: to direct the attention toward something in order to consider it
    Let's look at the possible options.
    possibility out of the realm of possibility
    Possibility - something possible: something that is possible
    Possibilities - potential: the potential for successful future development

    Yet he has already conservatively stated that there is only room for a “little bit”, or “wiggle room” so the options for
    possibilities will be limited by the budget plan that has only a small amount to make allowances for changes or increases to that budget.
    Last edited by Spring~Fields; 12-02-2006 at 02:10 PM.

  11. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    3,615

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    Uncle Carl used to say the same things about flexibility to add payroll midseason. It didnt happen when he said it and it didnt happen when Cast said it last year. Lets call "the trade" what it was, a salary dump. How much money did that trade save the Reds in arbitration raises? 10 million? Dont promise us one thing then deliver another. Anyone thinking Wayne is going to sign anyone thats not on the scrap heap and signing cheap is way off base imo. The more things change the more they stay the same.
    I was in the ORG once, best 6 months of my life.

  12. #26
    Score Early, Score Often gonelong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    4,138

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    Quote Originally Posted by redsmetz View Post
    And yet the irony is that most of Junior's injuries while with the Reds have been unrelated to his knees. .
    IMO they are all related. A weekness in one area of a limb leads to problems for the other areas.

    GL

  13. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    8,843

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    I really do like BCast's attitude and his sense of tradition for the organization. It's something that has been missing for quite some time. However, at the end of the day, results at the end of the season are all that really matters and I'm still optimisic that with some time, BCast can accomplish this.

    However, as everyone else has seen, the free agent market has shot through the roof this offseason. This just solidifies the importance of building a strong farm system. If you can build talent from the ground up each year and continue to have strong prospects, you can get by with a cheaper payroll (which I'm hopeful is the biggest and most important thing that Wayne learned from Terry Ryan in Minne). Before the Reds think about paying 15 million for a pitcher, they should think about sinking in some of that money to picking up some new scouts. That's ultimately who is going to bring you in the better (long-term) return. I understand that Reds fans aren't patient nor should they be. This drought of losing seasons has been horrific, but it's going to take time to undo all this damage from previous regimes.

  14. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    8,843

    Re: read Marc Lancasters blog comments with Bob!

    Quote Originally Posted by gonelong View Post
    IMO they are all related. A weekness in one area of a limb leads to problems for the other areas.

    GL
    Definitely seems that way.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25