Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Greatness In The Making RedLegSuperStar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    4,078

    Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Rotoworld.com

    Reds non-tendered catcher Miguel Perez.

    Perez was added to the 40-man roster too early a couple of years ago, and he never justified the spot while compiling some ugly numbers in the minors. He's just 23 and he's a fine defender, but he's a future backup at best and he has a long way to go.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    85

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Interesting...

  3. #3
    Marty Moose!!
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Carmel, IN
    Posts
    208

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Does this mean that Moeller can now be sent Louisville? One can only hope...

  4. #4
    Baseball card addict MrCinatit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Piqua
    Posts
    4,429

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Hm. So much for the catcher of the future.
    For now.

  5. #5
    Posting in Dynarama M2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    28,160

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Say what you will about Krivsky, but he's not afraid to do the dirty job of weeding.
    Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

    I'm witchcrafting everybody.

  6. #6
    Tired of talk. Win! Joseph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Commonwealth
    Posts
    8,350

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by M2 View Post
    Say what you will about Krivsky, but he's not afraid to do the dirty job of weeding.
    While many [including myself at times] question the GM, maybe he's got an idea how to do this and he's just doing the dirty work right now, and the building is to come?

    Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
    Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
    Chicago Blackhawks - 10, 13
    University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
    Cincinnati Bengals - None
    Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98

  7. #7
    Posting in Dynarama M2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    28,160

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by Joseph View Post
    While many [including myself at times] question the GM, maybe he's got an idea how to do this and he's just doing the dirty work right now, and the building is to come?
    That's the hope. I've got no idea whether he'll put something better in the place of all the rot that he's cleaved away, but I take some solace when I see the organization non-tender a faux prospect who's failed to make an ounce of progress in his woeful hitting approach. I like that the club isn't holding tightly to Brandon Claussen's obliterated wing. I like the front office purge. I liked it when Tony Womack and Dave Williams got sent out of town on a rail.

    It gives me some hope that Eric Milton's either going to show up healthy and effective in spring training or he's getting a one-way ticket out of town as well.
    Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

    I'm witchcrafting everybody.

  8. #8
    Kmac5 KoryMac5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Waterloo, NY
    Posts
    3,681

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by M2 View Post
    Say what you will about Krivsky, but he's not afraid to do the dirty job of weeding.
    I agree he knows how to weed but does he have any flowers to plant or is he just fertilizing tilled-up land.

  9. #9
    Vavasor TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Amarillo, TX
    Posts
    13,281

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    M2, I agree with the cutting away of chaff, but when said chaff is replaced with older chaff, what is the difference?

    Perez, non-tendered. Moeller signed. What's the difference other than he's 8 years older and a tad more expensive? Perez could have done the EXACT same job, and is bilingual. That helps with the Cueto's and Obispo's in the org.

    I'd have no problems seeing Szymanski gone. I have no problem at all with getting rid of dead weight. I just doubt that the guy that signed Juan Castro to a two year deal knows exactly what dead weight is. Now If Castro is reassigned as a coach in ST, I would be thrilled with that, but somehow I think that ain't gonna happen.
    Suck it up cupcake.

  10. #10
    GO XAVIER! toledodan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    overland park, kansas
    Posts
    1,880

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    I'd have no problems seeing Szymanski gone..

    when did we get rid of him?
    there's nothing like bowling a 300 game! 13 now and retired.


    Ricky henderson has a higher OBP than C. patterson and he's retired. C. Trent 6-14-2008

  11. #11
    HS Athletic Director alexad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Cleves, Ohio
    Posts
    1,212

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    I would rather have an experienced catcher at AAA than a young guy trying to find his way to the top. We have a ton of younger pitchers coming up and veteren catcher teaching them how to pitch will only help them. Just a thought.
    Taylor High School
    Home of the "Yellowjackets"

  12. #12
    Vavasor TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Amarillo, TX
    Posts
    13,281

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by toledodan View Post
    when did we get rid of him?
    any time this week would be fine with me.
    Suck it up cupcake.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    3,754

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    M2, I agree with the cutting away of chaff, but when said chaff is replaced with older chaff, what is the difference?
    The difference is, if the older chaff gets hot for a couple of months and the team is not in contention, you can flip them to a contender who needs a vet bat off the bench or a veteran MR who knows how to play the game. If you aren't out of it, you keep them and hope they stay hot for 162. If they suck, you cut them and try again. If you do it right, there can be some value in the churn.

  14. #14
    ZCTRMTP!!!!!
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,795

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    non-tendered for possessing a tender bat.....

  15. #15
    Greatness In The Making RedLegSuperStar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    4,078

    Re: Reds Non-Tendered Miguel Perez

    Out with the young.. in with the old


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25