Turn Off Ads?

View Poll Results: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

Voters
48. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes. It's the players, not the coaching.

    5 10.42%
  • NO! Chuck, "Adjustments" is not a four letter word.

    43 89.58%
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

  1. #1
    GR8NESS WMR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky
    Posts
    16,960

    SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    Nope, nada, no way. We need some new ideas on defense.
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
    Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)
    "Cheering for Kentucky is like watching Star Wars and hoping Darth Vader chokes an ewok"


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Pre-tty, pre-tty good!! MWM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    12,324

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    No way! He's terrible.
    Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    3,639

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    I am a Colts fan, he is way better than Ron Meeks.
    I was in the ORG once, best 6 months of my life.

  5. #4
    Let's ride BRM's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado's eastern plains
    Posts
    11,232

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    Quote Originally Posted by redsfanmia View Post
    I am a Colts fan, he is way better than Ron Meeks.
    Who isn't? Honestly, I have no idea how Meeks has kept his job this long.

  6. #5
    Administrator Boss-Hog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    6,077

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    The majority of the problem lies with the overall talent on defense, but I'll also in favor of getting rid of Chuck and his ultra vanilla schemes.

  7. #6
    Baseball card addict MrCinatit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Piqua
    Posts
    4,429

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    Other teams have so blatantly been able to overcome the play calling, I see no reason in keeping the guy.

  8. #7
    Raaaaaaaandy guttle11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,118

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    I don't buy the no talent arguement. This team has talent, at least enough to be middle of the pack. But the lack of good gameplans, and good adjustments have taken them to the bottom.

    Marvin needs to hire a guy who thinks like his Baltimore defenses did, attack, attack, attack. The guys the Bengals have, except Sam Adams, are smaller and quicker. Use that to your advantage.

    If their is a small lack of talent, it can be hidden with smoke and mirrors with aggressiveness until the talent and that defense can be decent until more talent is there and ready.
    "I saw Wedding Crashers accidentally. I bought a ticket for Grizzly Man and went into the wrong theater. After an hour, I figured I was in the wrong theater, but I kept waiting. Thatís the thing about bear attacks. They come when you least expect it."-Dwight K. Schrute

  9. #8
    Administrator Boss-Hog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    6,077

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    Quote Originally Posted by guttle11 View Post
    I don't buy the no talent arguement. This team has talent, at least enough to be middle of the pack. But the lack of good gameplans, and good adjustments have taken them to the bottom.

    Marvin needs to hire a guy who thinks like his Baltimore defenses did, attack, attack, attack. The guys the Bengals have, except Sam Adams, are smaller and quicker. Use that to your advantage.

    If their is a small lack of talent, it can be hidden with smoke and mirrors with aggressiveness until the talent and that defense can be decent until more talent is there and ready.
    I look at this linebacking corps (minus Thurman) and I don't see much talent. Looking at the defensive line, while they've done better this year against the run, (partially due to teams being able to throw the ball at will against us) I definitely wouldn't rate it any better than average. I know Geathers has 10.5 sacks, but as a unit, they really struggle to get a consistent pass rush, IMO. The New England, Atlanta, Indianapolis and several other games are perfect examples in which we got zero pressure on the quarterback.

    As for the defensive backs, I think the safeties are adequate and Jonathan Joseph is going to be a good player, but Tory's well past his prime and Deltha hasn't been anywhere near as good as he was last year (on or off the field). I think the problems are a result of lack of overall talent on that side of the ball and with the scheme they run.

  10. #9
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,242

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    The talent arguement holds water. This teams' most athletic and talented linebackers are currently suspended and heading to retirement respectively. This defense has been gashed by underneath and intermediate routes all year. God bless Caleb Miller, but he is absolutely lost in pass coverage. Ahmed Brooks, is a physical freak but he was not ready for the NFL yet, I look for a ton of improvement from him next year. This team must come up with at least one more linebacker, and possibly and I mean this is a real dilemma, give Thurman another chance. This defense was built for a fast linebacker to flow to the ball, and to clean up, ala Ray Lewis. The lack of fast good linebackers has been the downfall of the defense. Pollack was supposed to provide the pass rushing option from the OLB position. Has a linebacker even gotten free on the QB since he went down? I can't remember seeing it happen. Compounding this is the fact that Justin Smith has hit his free agent year. Normally I would say let him walk, but the Bengals are faced with the prospect of having to come up with a starting defensive end, and a OLB, and a MLB. Simmons, is old slow and steady. Not terms you like to see on your linebackers. Landon Johnson is just fine.

    I am not saying that Bresnahan is without blame, but this has been a talent issue. This team first got wind of Thurman's problems, at mini camp, and then the big blow came after the Steeler game. Thurman adds the swagger, and the playmaking ability. Name one other player that has his energy that we have seen in Cincinnati since David Fulcher and Tim Krumrie on defense.
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    2,347

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    Bresnahan's scheme is perfect for beating dumb coaches and bad quarterbacks. That can only take a team so far.

    Can him.

  12. #11
    Passion for the game Team Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    8,105

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    Quote Originally Posted by dsmith421 View Post
    Bresnahan's scheme is perfect for beating dumb coaches and bad quarterbacks. That can only take a team so far.

    Can him.
    Amen! Send Tory "toast" James with him too!
    It's absolutely pathetic that people can't have an opinion from actually watching games and supplementing that with stats. If you voice an opinion that doesn't fit into a black/white box you will get completely misrepresented and basically called a tobacco chewing traditionalist...
    Cedric 3/24/08

  13. #12
    Member OesterPoster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    West-central Ohio
    Posts
    2,053

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    Tory James is gone after this year.
    O'Neal's contract is up as well.
    Simmons - old and slow.
    Justin Smith - due for a huge payday in free agency (which is fine with me, because he lacks any sort of pass rush ability).
    Geathers - restricted free agent.
    Kaesviharn - free agent, probably gone.
    Miller & Johnson - free agents, so one is probably gone.
    Thurman - fuhgedabout it. He's done in Cinci.
    Pollack - done.
    Ratliff - not sure about him.
    Greg Brooks - not sure.
    Joseph - starter at CB.
    Williams - starter at S.
    Jackson - starter at S.
    Adams - starter at T.
    Peko - starter at T.
    Ahmad Brooks - starter?
    Robinson - not sure about him.
    Thornton - gone.
    Fanene - not sure.
    Nicholson - in the rotation.

    Obviously, a bunch of potential holes on defense for 2007. Add in the loss of Bresnahan who is a complete dumbass, and this defense will look very different next year (hopefully for the better).

    They best be drafting the best corner, linebacker, or rush end in rounds 1 through 4, with the hope of a good tight end in there too. I think we lose our 3rd round pick due to the selection of Brooks in the supplemental.

  14. #13
    Making sense of it all Matt700wlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,519

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    Gruden for DC?

    Just throwing things out there...

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    2,347

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt700wlw View Post
    Gruden for DC?

    Just throwing things out there...
    "Prior to his four seasons in Oakland, Gruden spent 1995-97 as offensive coordinator for the Philadelphia Eagles and three years (1992-94) as wide receivers coach for Green Bay Packers. He worked as offensive assistant for the San Francisco 49ers in 1990."

    http://www.nfl.com/teams/coaching/TB

    Hiring an offensive guy to be the DC is a very Bengals thing to do, but unlikely.

    I'd prefer to see Lewis just take the reins himself. There's no up-and-comer I can think of that has the experience and record of success.

  16. #15
    Making sense of it all Matt700wlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,519

    Re: SHOULD Chuck Bresnahan keep his job?

    Woops....got my coordinators mixed up



    My bad.....Gruden for Brat (of course, that wasn't the question proposed)


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25