Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Would Pete Rose...

  1. #1
    2009: Fail Ltlabner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    7,441

    Would Pete Rose...

    ...be as revered if he had played for the Dodgers in the 70's?

    Would his brand of "give it your all" baseball still be respected by the fans in Cincy who generally admire and respond to hard-charging baseball players?

    Or would he be dispised because he was a Dodger thus the exact same Pete Rose would be loathed instead of deified.
    Last edited by Ltlabner; 01-08-2007 at 01:02 PM.
    a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude.

    I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West
    Posts
    4,737

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    If Rose had been an LA native, and had the same career with the Dodgers, he would be totally despised by Reds fans, but the Rose cult in LA would be even bigger than it is in Cincinnati today.

    If he had played for the Yankees, and been born in NYC, he would have never been caught betting on the game, and would today be in the HoF. There are too many people there who would have helped him, in any way possible.

    Rose has not been the only player to bet on baseball since 1920 (no, I have no proof of this; these things don't happen in a vacuum, however). No way, no how. He was the only one dumb enough to be caught, however.

  4. #3
    Passion for the game Team Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    8,104

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ltlabner View Post
    ...be as revered if he had played for the Dodgers in the 70's?

    Would his brand of "give it your all" baseball still be respected by the fans in Cincy who generally admire and respond to hard-charging baseball players?

    Or would he be dispised because he was a Dodger thus the exact same Pete Rose would be loathed instead of deified.
    Great question. Pete's luster is somewhat related to the "Hometown Hero" lore. No question he would still be labeled as a Great Player but I'm not sure if all the superlative adjectives that accompany Pete would still work.
    It's absolutely pathetic that people can't have an opinion from actually watching games and supplementing that with stats. If you voice an opinion that doesn't fit into a black/white box you will get completely misrepresented and basically called a tobacco chewing traditionalist...
    Cedric 3/24/08

  5. #4
    Beer is good!! George Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    4,699

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    I think had Rose been a Dodger, while he may not of been liked I think at the very least he would have been respected. Lenny Dykstra is a "give it your all" player similar to Rose and while not loved by reds fans he is at the least respected. I think the same would be said about Rose.
    "Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard

  6. #5
    Passion for the game Team Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    8,104

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    Quote Originally Posted by George Anderson View Post
    I think had Rose been a Dodger, while he may not of been liked I think at the very least he would have been respected. Lenny Dykstra is a "give it your all" player similar to Rose and while not loved by reds fans he is at the least respected. I think the same would be said about Rose.
    I agree with that 100%. I do have a question for you. Do you remember Dykstra for being a met or a Philly? I remember him more as a Philly.
    It's absolutely pathetic that people can't have an opinion from actually watching games and supplementing that with stats. If you voice an opinion that doesn't fit into a black/white box you will get completely misrepresented and basically called a tobacco chewing traditionalist...
    Cedric 3/24/08

  7. #6
    Member Spring~Fields's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    8,630

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    Quote Originally Posted by Always Red View Post
    If Rose had been an LA native, and had the same career with the Dodgers, he would be totally despised by Reds fans, but the Rose cult in LA would be even bigger than it is in Cincinnati today.

    If he had played for the Yankees, and been born in NYC, he would have never been caught betting on the game, and would today be in the HoF. There are too many people there who would have helped him, in any way possible.

    Rose has not been the only player to bet on baseball since 1920 (no, I have no proof of this; these things don't happen in a vacuum, however). No way, no how. He was the only one dumb enough to be caught, however.
    In our society, it is very possible that the points that you are implying could be very true. Inconsistencies and double-standards do occur.

    I will always believe that baseball muffed the Rose dealings at the point of having him banned from the HOF, a museum.

    They should have let him have his one day, his plaque with an asterisk saying that he was banned, listed the reasons, and stuck with the lifetime ban from baseball. The whole Rose thing would have long passed away like a tumble weed in the wind, long before now.
    Last edited by Spring~Fields; 01-08-2007 at 01:35 PM.

  8. #7
    Beer is good!! George Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    4,699

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    Quote Originally Posted by Team Clark View Post
    I agree with that 100%. I do have a question for you. Do you remember Dykstra for being a met or a Philly? I remember him more as a Philly.
    Philly, mostly because the 94' WS with the Phils was more recent than the 86' WS he played with the Mets
    "Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard

  9. #8
    Passion for the game Team Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    8,104

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    Quote Originally Posted by George Anderson View Post
    Philly, mostly because the 94' WS with the Phils was more recent than the 86' WS he played with the Mets
    Me too. I also remember that cool SI cover of him. Big Chew wad and all. I remember when he flirted with .400 through the All Star break and attributed his success to a "rigourous" off-season workout program. Ohh yeah and the "vitamins".
    It's absolutely pathetic that people can't have an opinion from actually watching games and supplementing that with stats. If you voice an opinion that doesn't fit into a black/white box you will get completely misrepresented and basically called a tobacco chewing traditionalist...
    Cedric 3/24/08

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    1,362

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    I totally agree but to me that still seems like a double standard. There are far, far worse people in the Hall than Pete Rose. Should they put "racist" on Cap Anson's or Ty Cobb's plaques? How about "boozing philanderer" on The Babe's? Let him in the Hall, if he can get the necessary votes and that's no sure thing, and keep him banned from Organized Baseball.

  11. #10
    Passion for the game Team Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    8,104

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    Quote Originally Posted by Handofdeath View Post
    Should they put "racist" on Cap Anson's or Ty Cobb's plaques?
    You forgot Bob Feller.
    It's absolutely pathetic that people can't have an opinion from actually watching games and supplementing that with stats. If you voice an opinion that doesn't fit into a black/white box you will get completely misrepresented and basically called a tobacco chewing traditionalist...
    Cedric 3/24/08

  12. #11
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West
    Posts
    4,737

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    Quote Originally Posted by SpringfieldFan View Post
    In our society, it is very possible that the points that you are implying could be very true. Inconsistencies and double-standards do occur.

    I will always believe that baseball muffed the Rose dealings at the point of having him banned from the HOF, a museum.

    They should have let him have his one day, his plaque with an asterisk saying that he was banned, listed the reasons, and stuck with the lifetime ban from baseball. The whole Rose thing would have long passed away like a tumble weed in the wind, long before now.
    Rose forced MLB, in a way, into the muff. He really did dig his own grave; and I grew up idolizing the man. I still love what he did as a player, and he remains my favorite, though very tarnished. Growing up on the west side of town in the early 70's, there was no other way other than Rose worship for baseball playing boys from Cincinnati.

    In NYC, if he had been raised there and played for the Yankees, he still would have done what he did, but he'd have been surrounded by a lot of people whose job it would have been to keep Pete out of trouble. Not so in the fishbowl of being a star in flyover country.

    I agree he should be in the HoF for what he did on the field, and remain banned for life for what he did off the field. Pete is not a very smart man; you can tell that every time he opens his mouth these days.

    PS- Len Dykstra is a Met forever in my mind; not sure why, I just never thought of him as a Phillie.

  13. #12
    Passion for the game Team Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    8,104

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    Quote Originally Posted by Always Red View Post
    PS- Len Dykstra is a Met forever in my mind; not sure why, I just never thought of him as a Phillie.
    Was that '86 team not the best at platooning players? Dykstra/Wilson and Backman/Tefuel. There was one other platoon I thought I just can't remember.
    It's absolutely pathetic that people can't have an opinion from actually watching games and supplementing that with stats. If you voice an opinion that doesn't fit into a black/white box you will get completely misrepresented and basically called a tobacco chewing traditionalist...
    Cedric 3/24/08

  14. #13
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West
    Posts
    4,737

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    Quote Originally Posted by Team Clark View Post
    Was that '86 team not the best at platooning players? Dykstra/Wilson and Backman/Tefuel. There was one other platoon I thought I just can't remember.
    Kevin Mitchell, George Foster and Howard Johnson (3B, SS) also got a lot of AB's on that team.

    That was one great team, when you look back at it.

    They had Gary Carter (C), Keith Hernandez (1B), Backman, Teufel, Howard Johnson, Ray Knight and Rafael Santana in the INF, and an OF of Mookie Wilson, Daryl Strawberry, Len Dykstra, Mitchell and Foster.

    Oh, and let's not forget a starting pitching staff 5 of: Doc Gooden, Ron Darling, Sid Fernandez, Bob Ojeda and Rick Aguilera (not a bad #5, eh?). And just for good measure, Roger McDowell and Jesse Orosco, both to finish games up.

  15. #14
    Passion for the game Team Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    8,104

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    Quote Originally Posted by Always Red View Post
    Kevin Mitchell, George Foster and Howard Johnson (3B, SS) also got a lot of AB's on that team.

    That was one great team, when you look back at it.

    They had Gary Carter (C), Keith Hernandez (1B), Backman, Teufel, Howard Johnson, Ray Knight and Rafael Santana in the INF, and an OF of Mookie Wilson, Daryl Strawberry, Len Dykstra, Mitchell and Foster.

    Oh, and let's not forget a starting pitching staff 5 of: Doc Gooden, Ron Darling, Sid Fernandez, Bob Ojeda and Rick Aguilera (not a bad #5, eh?). And just for good measure, Roger McDowell and Jesse Orosco, both to finish games up.

    That's a winner. Selfless ballplayers filling their roles. I seem to recall they were a bit "scrappy" too.
    It's absolutely pathetic that people can't have an opinion from actually watching games and supplementing that with stats. If you voice an opinion that doesn't fit into a black/white box you will get completely misrepresented and basically called a tobacco chewing traditionalist...
    Cedric 3/24/08

  16. #15
    Member Spring~Fields's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    8,630

    Re: Would Pete Rose...

    Quote Originally Posted by Handofdeath View Post
    I totally agree but to me that still seems like a double standard. There are far, far worse people in the Hall than Pete Rose. Should they put "racist" on Cap Anson's or Ty Cobb's plaques? How about "boozing philanderer" on The Babe's? Let him in the Hall, if he can get the necessary votes and that's no sure thing, and keep him banned from Organized Baseball.
    You're right that would be another inconsistency and double-standard.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25