"ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports that Pollack's surgery went so well that doctors have told him that assuming rehab goes well, he can expect to make a full recovery and resume his playing career in 2007 if he so desires."
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2719025
Super news!
That is SUPER GREAT NEWS!!!
Seems amazingly impossible. I hope that's the case! Pollack's a good dude. Would love to see him in stripes next season.
For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism.
Great news for David - while it would be great to see him play again, just seeing him get a whole lot better is good enough.
Can he play any different? I mean he is what he is. He goes all out like a Freel with shoulder pads. He has to change the way he hit's people, and that is hard to do, because it comes natural. He leads with his head.
1st pick of the 2023 baseball amateur draft
Dave Lapham speculated that if he does come back he will come back as a defensive end, less chance to play in space with head to head collisions. He said that about two weeks ago.Originally Posted by George Foster
Hugs, smiling, and interactive Twitter accounts, don't mean winning baseball. Until this community understands that we are cursed to relive the madness.
That's great for David, even if he never really makes it back to the NFL. At least his health is OK.
School's out. What did you expect?
A break for the Bengals is welcome right now--no pun intended.
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Reply With Quote