Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: CF and closer options

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    511

    CF and closer options

    What if the Reds trade Bray for Rowland then sign Hermanson to be the closer.I think it would help the team on all fronts.What do you think?


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Puffy's Daddy Red Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    20,422

    Re: CF and closer options

    Quote Originally Posted by fewfirstchoice View Post
    What if the Reds trade Bray for Rowland then sign Hermanson to be the closer.I think it would help the team on all fronts.What do you think?
    Just to be clear, do you mean the Phillies Aaron Rowand?
    'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.'
    -Snoop on his retirement

    Your Mom is happy.

  4. #3
    Member reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    29,518

    Re: CF and closer options

    No. I think we would have to hang Krivsky if he did that.
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter View Post
    A little bit off topic, but do you guys think that Jesse Winker profiles more like Pete Rose or is he just the next Hal Morris??

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    We have pitchers now?!
    Posts
    1,017

    Re: CF and closer options

    Deno>Freel>Rowand.

    I'd still go with Deno over both.
    "For every moment of triumph, for every instance of beauty, many souls must be trampled."
    -Hunter S. Thompson

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Cincinnati Ohio
    Posts
    956

    Re: CF and closer options

    I think with amply playing time, Chris Denorfia is Aaron Rowland in a production sense

  7. #6
    Member tripleaaaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Thomas, KY
    Posts
    757

    Re: CF and closer options

    Rowand and Freel are very similar, both play all out, while I like these players this wouldn't solve anything, I can see it now, With Rowand in Center and Freel in right, Both going all out to the ball with recklessness, smashing into each other. Although I like Rowand we need to look elsewhere, a little more pop and RBI's
    ___________________
    Strikeouts are boring - besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. More democratic. ~Bull Durham

  8. #7
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,358

    Re: CF and closer options

    Deno is CF.

    Coffey should be given first crack at closer. Maybe Bray gets 15-20% save chances to keep his head in it.

    I'd rather see if Coffey/Bray can handle the role than have Weathers and Stanton be the closers on a team which has a minimal shot at the playoffs.

  9. #8
    Let's ride BRM's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado's eastern plains
    Posts
    11,232

    Re: CF and closer options

    Quote Originally Posted by edabbs44 View Post
    Deno is CF.

    Coffey should be given first crack at closer. Maybe Bray gets 15-20% save chances to keep his head in it.

    I'd rather see if Coffey/Bray can handle the role than have Weathers and Stanton be the closers on a team which has a minimal shot at the playoffs.
    I concur. There really is no reason to trade for a CF right now. Deno and Freel can take of the job.

  10. #9
    Member dunner13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    616

    Re: CF and closer options

    I think deno wouldnt be much of an offensive drop from rowand. And I guarantee you that bray +deno is greater than rowand+hermanson.

  11. #10
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,358

    Re: CF and closer options

    Quote Originally Posted by BRM View Post
    I concur. There really is no reason to trade for a CF right now. Deno and Freel can take of the job.
    If anything, I'd be shopping Freel.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,510

    Re: CF and closer options

    To me, the only reason to trade Freel or Deno is to get a lefty hitter for CF. That way you can have a lefty/righty platoon (both Freel and Deno are righty hitters). Rowand doesn't accomplish that.

    We don't know what the Reds really think of Deno. I thought he looked real good in September, once he got comfortable. He hits a lot of infield grounders -- at one point he hit a ton of grounders to short -- but eventually he seemed to get over that.

    If Freel can get 350 at bats as a centerfielder, with Deno getting 250 at bats in center, that would work for me. (Freel could get some more at bats filling in elsewhere occasionally.) Wonder what the Reds braintrust has in mind.

  13. #12
    Puffy's Daddy Red Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    20,422

    Re: CF and closer options

    I think the Reds can afford to trade Freel / Deno if they can get a RH power hitting bat in return to stick in the 5th spot in the order. Their lineup could really use a RH power bat to hit behind Griffey.

    Another scenario would be to trade Freel / Deno + a reliever to get a closer in return.

    Yet another scenario would be to trade Freel / Deno + Milton to get a better option in the rotation.

    Those are the three scenarios I'd trade Freel / Deno.
    'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.'
    -Snoop on his retirement

    Your Mom is happy.

  14. #13
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,358

    Re: CF and closer options

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Leader View Post
    I think the Reds can afford to trade Freel / Deno if they can get a RH power hitting bat in return to stick in the 5th spot in the order. Their lineup could really use a RH power bat to hit behind Griffey.

    Another scenario would be to trade Freel / Deno + a reliever to get a closer in return.

    Yet another scenario would be to trade Freel / Deno + Milton to get a better option in the rotation.

    Those are the three scenarios I'd trade Freel / Deno.
    I'll take scenarios 2-3. The first one...not so much. Where does that RH "power hitter" play? Freel shouldn't be traded for a platoon guy. I'd like to see him dealt for a young pitcher with a good amt of promise. Florida would be my first call.

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,783

    Re: CF and closer options

    I'd rather just keep Freel, although if the right deal came along I wouldn't ignore it.

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    4,122

    Re: CF and closer options

    I don't understand this. Why would you trade away something you need (bullpen, especially a lefty with upside) for something you have in surplus (centerfielders). We have two VERY capable, and good CF'ers in Freel and Deno.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator