Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 46

Thread: GM to buy Chrysler?

  1. #1
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,807
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,136

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    They should make this 55 Falcon



    Designed to be the basis for a competitor to the Ford Thunderbird and Chevrolet Corvette, the Chrysler Falcon had a carbureted, cast iron, 276 ci overhead-valve V8 engine, rated at 170 hp, with 255 lbft of torque, mated to a two-speed automatic transmission. With a weight of 3,300 lb, it gave the car impressive performance for the time. Only a single vehicle was produced, which was shown at several autoshows. Eventually it was sold to a private owner.[

  4. #3
    First Time Caller SunDeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Posts
    6,211

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    The potential deal between the two automakers could go beyond cooperation on joint development of a large sport utility vehicle, the magazine said.
    Man, Ford must really be a mess if the talks they had with GM sent them to Chrysler. But if a merger is going to produce even more stupid, supersized SUVs, it won't help.

    Adding Chrysler does what, other than adding a solid minivan performer (which GM can't seem to get their minds around)? The only way this works is if GM takes on Chrysler and drops all the duplication it has between the brands.
    So, let's blue sky this a little- here is your new automaker, General Chrysler, using the following models:

    Chrysler minivans, Siebring, and that hip little sportscar...what's it called?
    Dodge small pickups
    Jeep Cherokee, Liberty and the old CJ...what is that now, Wrangler?
    Buick Lucern and Lacrosse (Lacrosse only until all the people born prior to 1940 who buy a new Century every three years die off)
    Pontiac Vibe, Torrent, G6 (provided they turn it into a viable competitor with the Civic)
    Chevy trucks, Equinox, Corvette, Impala (only high output for police fleets)
    Cadillac- probably all of them.
    GMC- kill it off, replace with Dodge/Cummins
    Hummer- keep them all.

    What am I missing?
    Next Reds manager, second shooter. --Confirmed on Redszone.

  5. #4
    University of Cincinnati
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Clifton, OH
    Posts
    701

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    Might not be a bad idea. These two companies need to merge and figure out something quick. If they ever want to outsell the Imports they need to start putting their heads together, especially with the hybrid cars. Companies like Toyota keep making better cars that are more efficient while it seems the American companies keep falling behind.
    THE University of Cincinnati

  6. #5
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    I thought Daimler merged with Chrysler a couple years back.

    Does this mean GM is trying to gain the Chrysler brand, or are they trying to gain the Mercedes (Daimler) brand?

  7. #6
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,807

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    Would Justice OK this deal?
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  8. #7
    Danger is my business! oneupper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,257

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    Dr. Z got tired of his own commercials.
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."

    http://dalmady.blogspot.com

  9. #8
    First Time Caller SunDeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Posts
    6,211

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    I think this deal is probably about buying Chrysler from Daimler. Owning Chrysler has been a loser for the germans.
    Next Reds manager, second shooter. --Confirmed on Redszone.

  10. #9
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    7,057

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    If they could couple an Allison transmission with a Cummins diesel engine, that would make a serious power train for a truck.
    Hugs, smiling, and interactive Twitter accounts, don't mean winning baseball. Until this community understands that we are cursed to relive the madness.

  11. #10
    First Time Caller SunDeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Posts
    6,211

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    Quote Originally Posted by LoganBuck View Post
    If they could couple an Allison transmission with a Cummins diesel engine, that would make a serious power train for a truck.
    Yep, that's the kind of stuff that has to be in their thinking, if this is more than a rumor. That would be a nice combo.
    Next Reds manager, second shooter. --Confirmed on Redszone.

  12. #11
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Athens, OH
    Posts
    13,572

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    Would Justice OK this deal?
    More than anything else in a deal like this, the government doesn't want an automaker's pension fund to dry up. That would put a lot of retirees below the poverty line and retirees tend to be vocal and voters. Unless the deal doesn't adequately protect the Chrysler pension fund, the current Justice Department will let it go through.

    When it goes through, I imagine there will be some token concessions extracted from GM, like AT&T had to make when they scarfed up BellSouth, but they'll be a minor hindrance.
    /r/reds

  13. #12
    Member dman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Grove City, Ohio
    Posts
    1,385

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    Great, now the terrible and defective brake system that GM put on their vehicles can be combined with Chrysler's terrible transmissions and suspensions. Really looking forward to this one.

    I'm already giving serious consideration to trading my Dakota in on that new Toyota Tundra. Only thing stopping me right now is that my Dakota is paid off.

  14. #13
    Member 15fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    6,013

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    Why people keep buying crappy Ford/GM/Chrysler cars is beyond me.

  15. #14
    2009: Fail Ltlabner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    7,441

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    Quote Originally Posted by dman View Post
    Great, now the terrible and defective brake system that GM put on their vehicles can be combined with Chrysler's terrible transmissions and suspensions. Really looking forward to this one.
    Had a 2003 Concorde Limited. Tranny exploded at 77,000miles. I followed the maintenance schedule to a T, and mostly drive highway miles. I'll have to think long and hard before buying another Chrysler product again.

    Had a mid-to-late Pontiac Grand Am. Absoulte worst car I ever owned. I've posted about it before, but it totally sucked. Was in the shop all the time and the brakes needed repalced every 30,000miles or so despite all my miles being highway.

    But the two together.......yikes........you might end up with a super valcano of suckatude right there.

  16. #15
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    12,908

    Re: GM to buy Chrysler?

    Here's what they need to be making:



Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator