Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32

Thread: Majewskigate redux?

  1. #16
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    8,769

    Re: Majewskigate redux?

    All I hope at this point is that WK learned a lot from that deal.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    11,040

    Re: "My scapula is tired, fatigued..."

    From the Hal McCoy article (insert grain of salt here)

    "The doctor cleared me to throw, but they're putting me on a program to build my strength back up," he said. "My scapula is tired, fatigued, slowed down and not working with everything else. I've been here for two weeks working out because a couple weeks before that I visited the doctor in Cincinnati, and we figured out what was wrong. So it is a matter of working hard to get the shoulder strong, really hammering it."
    If this is an accurate quote, this really makes me wonder about our medical staff. Given the history with Majewski, why on earth wasn't he on a strengthening program during the entire off-season? I wonder about Kremchek sometimes.

  4. #18
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,706

    Re: "My scapula is tired, fatigued..."

    Quote Originally Posted by redsmetz View Post
    I wonder about Kremchek sometimes.
    Kremchek's a turd, but you can't treat something you're not apprised of. In the article, it also says that Maj downplays the severity of the pain/weakness. I kind of find it hard to fault Doc in this case.

  5. #19
    Miami Redhawks Redhook's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincy
    Posts
    2,257

    Re: "My scapula is tired, fatigued..."

    Quote Originally Posted by redsmetz View Post
    From the Hal McCoy article (insert grain of salt here)



    If this is an accurate quote, this really makes me wonder about our medical staff. Given the history with Majewski, why on earth wasn't he on a strengthening program during the entire off-season? I wonder about Kremchek sometimes.
    Agreed. This is not good and it doesn't seem like a simple case of him just needing more strength in his shoulder. I don't know what's going on with the Reds medical staff.

    On the bright side, it seems we have plenty of average relievers, and that's pretty much was Majic is, to take his place if and when he doesn't pitch. Unless he pitched like he did in 2005, highly unlikely, I don't think he'd make that much of a difference good or bad for the 2007 Reds.
    "....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421

    www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips.

  6. #20
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    11,040

    Re: "My scapula is tired, fatigued..."

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    Kremchek's a turd, but you can't treat something you're not apprised of. In the article, it also says that Maj downplays the severity of the pain/weakness. I kind of find it hard to fault Doc in this case.
    For me it isn't an issue of what took place last summer. I completely agree with you that it appears that Bowden's staff did not fully disclose the then recent treatment of Majek. And perhaps it isn't really anything, but I would think, since he came off the disabled list towards the end of last season that he would have been given a solid strengthening program and, it seems from this quote, it wasn't done.

    I sometimes wonder whether Kremchek's more in love with the celebrity than actually doing the job he's paid to do. Word on the street is that he also doesn't run to and from the operating room. Wait until Marty catches wind of that!

  7. #21
    You know his story Redsland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    7,714

    Re: Majewskigate redux?

    His scapula is tired?

    (Psst...Doc? Hey Doc. The scapula is a bone. Bones don't get tired.)
    Makes all the routine posts.

  8. #22
    Puffy's Daddy Red Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    20,422

    Re: Majewskigate redux?

    Quote Originally Posted by Redsland View Post
    His scapula is tired?

    (Psst...Doc? Hey Doc. The scapula is a bone. Bones don't get tired.)


    You said it, dude.
    'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.'
    -Snoop on his retirement

    Your Mom is happy.

  9. #23
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,706

    Re: Majewskigate redux?

    Quote Originally Posted by Redsland View Post
    His scapula is tired?

    (Psst...Doc? Hey Doc. The scapula is a bone. Bones don't get tired.)
    That's Maj. saying his scapula is tired, not Doc.

  10. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    3,548

    Re: Majewskigate redux?

    They're talking about scapulothoracic dyskinesia likely.
    "You're drunk again. No, I'm just exhausted 'cause I've been up all night drinking."
    Peter Griffin

  11. #25
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,047

    Re: Majewskigate redux?

    Ahh, spring is now officially here. We now have the pitcher that has been placed on the strengthening program. Jimmy Haynes, Denny Naegle, Pete Harnish, Paul Wilson, etc say
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  12. #26
    Member Spitball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    5,598

    Re: Majewskigate redux?

    Quote Originally Posted by M2 View Post
    He won't. He doesn't have nearly the stuff for it.
    I disagree. Ryan and Bray are both power lefties that throw in the low nineties. To say Bray doesn't "have nearly the stuff" is a dismissal without substance but with the benefit of not having to actually have to wait until the future to prove that statement.

    Ryan was about the same age as Bray when he was traded by the Reds and no one felt he was an all-star closer in the making. The former 17th round pick threw hard, but he was all over the place with his pitches and his mechanics. He was not as good a pitcher as Bray at similar stages of their careers.

    Bray was a first round pick, chosen right after Jered Weaver. Even if he was picked too early, he was easily a late round one or round two pick. He has legitimate potential to develop into a power closer, but we will have to wait before we can proclaim the development settled.


    It should be noted that Ryan didn't do anything worth mentioning until he was age 27. If Bray takes another four years to break through I'm going out on a limb and predicting he won't be with the Reds when it happens.
    As stated, Bray is already developing faster than than Ryan. At the baseline, Bray is starting with greater potential than Ryan, but of course there are lots of factors to reaching perceived potential.

    Though Kearns and Lopez have amassed essentially the same number of Win Shares to date as Ryan even after he turned into B.J. Ryan. A better comparable for Bray would be Mike Stanton, whose value has been in longevity, not excellence.
    Is the first statement designed to prove the second? I don't believe it does because the second statement is merely an unsubstantiated opinion.

    That's an odd grouping in terms of career value. Alou and Sanders, though they've made a lot of stops, probably rank in the top 50 RFs of all time. If Kearns goes on to have a career like those two then we should wail openly.
    My point was obviously that the mentioned outfielders were well travelled because they are good not great players at a position that is easy to develop or sign. The right fielder should be one of the top three offensive players on the team, and I don't believe Kearns will ever develop into that type of player on a good team. He just isn't that good. His pre-trade line playing half his games in a hitters' park was .274/.351/.492, which was not bad except he is a right fielder. They should be hitting better. Kearns struckout nearly 25% of the time and grounded into double plays better than 10% times he came to bat with a runner on first. He was a poor hitter with runners on base and scoring position (I believe he actually cost the Reds 3.6 runs). Kearns created (park adjusted) only 4.83 runs for ever 27 outs while with the Reds last season. He was an average offensive player, playing a position in which better offense should be expected, on the verge of arbitration. He was also injury prone, overweight, under motivated, and a year removed from minor league demotion. Kearns had very little trade value, but he still needed to be moved.


    Jose Vidro would be the comp I'd use. I'll be fairly amazed if Lopez doesn't surpass the first four guys on your list.
    Well, you may be amazed, but that is just your opnion. Between 2001 and 2004, Lopez was not a very good player. In 2005, he had a very good year, but 16 of his 23 homers were first row shots at GAB. Last year, he showed regression. Which Lopez will it be? Throw out 2005 and you have little merit for suggesting Lopez will surpass the second basemen I mentioned.

    Lopez and Kearns were not/are not good enough players to merit takng significant budget room.

    As for the historical significance of the deal, it profiles as pretty awful.
    Well, we could argue the historical merit of anything, but it (history) requires time truly to measure the significance
    "I am your child from the future. I'm sorry I didn't tell you this earlier." - Dylan Easton

  13. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    3,548

    Re: Majewskigate redux?

    Quote Originally Posted by LoganBuck View Post
    Ahh, spring is now officially here. We now have the pitcher that has been placed on the strengthening program. Jimmy Haynes, Denny Naegle, Pete Harnish, Paul Wilson, etc say
    Exactly, this is sad.
    "You're drunk again. No, I'm just exhausted 'cause I've been up all night drinking."
    Peter Griffin

  14. #28
    Posting in Dynarama M2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    27,944

    Re: Majewskigate redux?

    Quote Originally Posted by Spitball View Post
    I disagree. Ryan and Bray are both power lefties that throw in the low nineties. To say Bray doesn't "have nearly the stuff" is a dismissal without substance but with the benefit of not having to actually have to wait until the future to prove that statement.
    Ryan can dial high '90s and he can get a two-plane break. I don't need to wait until the future to know Bray's stuff isn't nearly as filthy. I doubt there's a scout alive who'd grade Bray's stuff as being close to Ryan's. That's not a knock on Bray either. Stanton always had good stuff. I'm not saying Bray can't be good, but I'm not going to sit here and pretend his repertoire is better than it is either.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spitball
    Is the first statement designed to prove the second? I don't believe it does because the second statement is merely an unsubstantiated opinion.
    As unsubstantiated as comparing him to Ryan. What's that based on other than desperate hope? Stuffwise, Bray strikes me as being in Stanton's class. There's nothing wrong with spending the better part of two decades as a setup man.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spitball
    My point was obviously that the mentioned outfielders were well travelled because they are good not great players at a position that is easy to develop or sign.
    They travelled. So what. If a team had the foresight to keep Moises Alou for the past decade it would have gotten a .305/235/856 performance. That is far from easy to replace. Good players are good things to have around and they shouldn't be blithely dismissed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spitball
    The right fielder should be one of the top three offensive players on the team, and I don't believe Kearns will ever develop into that type of player on a good team. He just isn't that good. His pre-trade line playing half his games in a hitters' park was .274/.351/.492, which was not bad except he is a right fielder.
    Kearns ranked 9th among all RFs in runs above replacement player last year. He was roughly 40 OPS points above the average RF when the Reds dealt him.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spitball
    Kearns struckout nearly 25% of the time and grounded into double plays better than 10% times he came to bat with a runner on first. He was a poor hitter with runners on base and scoring position (I believe he actually cost the Reds 3.6 runs). Kearns created (park adjusted) only 4.83 runs for ever 27 outs while with the Reds last season. He was an average offensive player, playing a position in which better offense should be expected, on the verge of arbitration. He was also injury prone, overweight, under motivated, and a year removed from minor league demotion. Kearns had very little trade value, but he still needed to be moved.
    I was never an Austin Kearns fan. In fact, I'd have traded him years ago, but he didn't suck. He was above average for his position, young and cheap. Thanks to the contract he recently signed, he'll be a bargain for the next three years when he's in his prime. He was, unquestionably, more valuable than Wily Mo Pena, who fetched Arroyo.

    If Austin Kearns just trolls along as a middle tier RF the next few years, you'd have to be a fairly elite reliever to be more valuable than that. As I said before, if the Reds had decided to overpay and trade Kearns for Bray, because they're in love with the lefty, I would have been all right with that. It would have been a gamble, but I could at least see where the gamble might pay off. The deal went way beyond that and it's when you get into those matter where the objections really start to pile up.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spitball
    Well, you may be amazed, but that is just your opnion. Between 2001 and 2004, Lopez was not a very good player. In 2005, he had a very good year, but 16 of his 23 homers were first row shots at GAB. Last year, he showed regression. Which Lopez will it be? Throw out 2005 and you have little merit for suggesting Lopez will surpass the second basemen I mentioned.
    All he's got to do is have four more years like last season and he'll match guys like Walker and Belliard. Lopez doesn't have to get any better to do that. He's already a 15 Win Shares guy doing what he did last year. He doesn't have to reclaim any power. He doesn't have to field any better. He doesn't have to get any better now that he's heading into what should be his prime.

    That's not opinion. That's where he'll end up with another four years like his 2006 season. Perhaps it's your opinion that he'll get worse at a point in his career where most guys get better, but he took a decided step forward at age 25 and I've yet to see a rationale for why his OB skills will go into regression.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spitball
    Lopez and Kearns were not/are not good enough players to merit takng significant budget room.
    I guess it depends on your definition of "significant," but in baseball circa 2007 they're relative bargains -- $7.4M for two everyday players is peanuts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spitball
    Well, we could argue the historical merit of anything, but it (history) requires time truly to measure the significance
    I don't need time to measure the 2006 season. The deal weakened the Reds and the team very well could have won the division had the deal not been made. I also don't need time to measure the opportunity cost of not having Kearns and Lopez around to deal for someone else. The market popped. Lousy OFs are getting paid double what Kearns will make the next three seasons. The market made Kearns and Lopez more valuable this offseason (though I doubt the Nats are looking to put either one on the trading block). Meanwhile the Reds are so sold on Bray and Majewski that they've put out an APB for anyone who might be a major league reliever.

    It's possible the two relievers will perform well enough to allow the Reds to emerge from the transaction with some dignity (Bray more than Majewski), but the deal is already a dog. Hopefully it's just a schnauzer and not a rottweiler.
    Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

    I'm witchcrafting everybody.

  15. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    5,595

    Re: Majewskigate redux?

    Here's a bit of what Jerry Narron had to say:

    "We’re looking for Kyle Lohse to really break out and have a big year. Stuff-wise he’s as good as anybody. Just watching him on the side today, his changeup is outstanding. The big thing is if we can get him ahead in the count and throwing fewer pitches, I think he can be really effective. I know Dick Pole is looking forward to working with him."
    Here is one spot where there's an opportunity for the Reds to improve without acquiring another pitcher or counting on Bailey. I think that the raw talent to be a solid #3 starter is there with Lohse, I don't know if he's capable of harnessing it. This is an opportunity for Pole to make an immediate impact.

    I'd be thrilled if we could get solid seasons out of Harang, Arroyo and Lohse. Get several decent starts out of Milton and deal him at the break in favor of Bailey and get a league-average season out of Sarloos (or whoever is in the five hole). I'd love to find a promising youg lefty by this time next year too.
    Last edited by corkedbat; 02-21-2007 at 09:13 AM.

  16. #30
    Member Spitball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    5,598

    Re: Majewskigate redux?

    M2, I guess we are both entitled to our own opinions.
    Last edited by Spitball; 02-21-2007 at 11:10 AM.
    "I am your child from the future. I'm sorry I didn't tell you this earlier." - Dylan Easton


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25