Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Evaluation of the First Spring game of the year

  1. #1
    Member Eric_Davis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Portland, Or
    Posts
    5,041

    Evaluation of the First Spring game of the year

    What do you look for in Spring games?

    Different guys work on different things. Hitters' numbers don't mean a lot to me in Spring Training.

    I do however like to look at WHIPS in Spring, not overall WHIPS because you can have one bad day or two in Spring Training and screw that up. I especially like to see as pitcher's get closer to the start of the season what their WHIP's are each game.

    Today's WHIPS:

    Milton--------3.500 (2 IP) (2 HR's)
    Wilson--------2.000 (2 IP) (1 HR)
    Saarloos------0.000 (2 IP)
    Cormier-------2.000 (1 IP)
    Coffey--------0.000 (1 IP) (1 throwing Error, too)
    Salmon-------3.000 (1 IP)
    Rob Neyer: "Any writer who says he'd be a better manager than the worst manager is either 1) lying (i.e. 'using poetic license') or 2) patently delusional. Which isn't to say managers don't do stupid things that you or I wouldn't."


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    7,719

    Re: Evaluation of the First Spring game of the year

    I think the first weeks stats should automatically be shredded.

    After that I think Whip is a good place to start.
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckeyeRed27 View Post
    Honest I can't say it any better than Hoosier Red did in his post, he sums it up basically perfectly.

  4. #3
    2009: Fail Ltlabner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    7,441

    Re: Evaluation of the First Spring game of the year

    Tough break with the wind because you can't tell if it's the same old Eric Milton or the breeze that led to those two homers.

    Wilson is an experiment that frankly, I'd like to see ended sooner rather than later. I admire his drive and think he's a standup guy, but it's time to give it a rest.

    Saarloos, definatley impressive. Let's hope that's indicitive of what we'll continue to see. If he can keep the ball on the ground, as is his norm, the addition of Gonzo to Phillips up the middle will be a huge move.

    Coffey. About what you'd expect.

    Salmon. Not impressive but not horrible either.

  5. #4
    Member Eric_Davis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Portland, Or
    Posts
    5,041

    Re: Evaluation of the First Spring game of the year

    I don't put too much stock in guys having bad games early, but it's nice to see pitchers having good ones early, like Saarloos did here.
    Rob Neyer: "Any writer who says he'd be a better manager than the worst manager is either 1) lying (i.e. 'using poetic license') or 2) patently delusional. Which isn't to say managers don't do stupid things that you or I wouldn't."

  6. #5
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    12,908

    Re: Evaluation of the First Spring game of the year

    Quote Originally Posted by Ltlabner View Post
    Tough break with the wind because you can't tell if it's the same old Eric Milton or the breeze that led to those two homers.

    Wilson is an experiment that frankly, I'd like to see ended sooner rather than later. I admire his drive and think he's a standup guy, but it's time to give it a rest.

    Saarloos, definatley impressive. Let's hope that's indicitive of what we'll continue to see. If he can keep the ball on the ground, as is his norm, the addition of Gonzo to Phillips up the middle will be a huge move.

    Coffey. About what you'd expect.

    Salmon. Not impressive but not horrible either.
    I'm curious about your statement. This is a big "if", but if Wilson in fact healthy and his pitches are what they say they are, I can only see that as a plus. Now again, that's a big "if".


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator