For a right handed bat? Just wondering.
For a right handed bat? Just wondering.
Witty signature.
I would think Mr. Krivsky is always looking to make a deal to better the club.
As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.
I have said the reds need some right handed pop off the bench. Problem is...if they had the right handed pop, they would probably be in starting lineup !
I don't know who we could even trade for some Right Handed Power
Is I Wayne like an ipod?
Huh?Originally Posted by membengal
"Baseball players are smarter than football players. How often do you see a baseball team penalized for too many men on the field?" ~ Jim Bouton
"right handed pop."Huh?
If Wayne gets a right handed bat, it has to be a trade for a fairly major guy. A first baseman makes the most sense, but he has to be a significant upgrade over Hatte/Conine.
are you sugesting Krivsky is a swinger????????
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
I heard Wily Mo Pena and Austin Kearns might be available...
“Every level he goes to, he is going to compete. They will know who he is at every level he goes to.” -- ED on EDLC
Talk about something I never want to hear again!are you sugesting Krivsky is a swinger????????
They edited the title of the thread. Used to say "I Wayne trying to swing a deal?"Huh?
I liked it better the other way...
I wonder what Detroit would want for Marcus Thames? He's got a lot of pop and is the odd man out in their OF.
Better question is what on earth do we have to trade that any GM not named Dan O might value?
Frenchie, Milty and JR have zero to less than zero trade value.
Hatnine's replacement isn't ready and the Hatte portion isn't exactly helping his trade value right now. Conine portion is the only RH bat we have as we speak.
Stanton and Weathers are still needed.
Freel is there IF you take that gamble on Hamilton but there goes your only leadoff hitter and his IF flexibility.
IMO, we aren't at that "one guy away" stage to even consider selling off any, of the few we have, prospects.
Dunn would bring a haul (hopefully) but guts the offense and your taking the Hamilton mega-gamble again.
All in all I just don't see what he can trade right now and after the last fleecing I don't want to see him pull another mid season stunner.
I wonder what the Yankees would give us for Milton?
nothing....they haven't had a losing season since 1992.... just because they are one of the few organisations that can afford to constantly live for the now doesn't mean they are stupid....
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
