Turn Off Ads?
Page 18 of 19 FirstFirst ... 8141516171819 LastLast
Results 256 to 270 of 278

Thread: Lincecum opens up eyes at Giants camp

  1. #256
    Posting in Dynarama M2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    45,889

    Re: Lincecum opens up eyes at Giants camp

    Quote Originally Posted by Aronchis View Post
    I find it funny, that the Lincecum fans are now quite possibly regreting the firing of Dan O'brien so soon considering Krivsky's problems..................
    I sincerely doubt that.
    I'm not a system player. I am a system.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #257
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    4,672

    Re: Lincecum opens up eyes at Giants camp

    Quote Originally Posted by M2 View Post
    I sincerely doubt that.
    I don't know, I have read a few posts "lamenting" in his firing without letting him finish out his contract so he could get another draft and Cast could find a better man.

    Times are rough for Wayne.

  4. #258
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,522

    Lincecum opens up eyes at Giants camp

    I have often said that the decision to draft Gruler over Kazmir was a major set back for the Reds. Last night, I got to see Tim Lincecum pitch in person. He is a bit small so when he throws 97 mph fastballs it may require more effort than a bigger pitcher. But the guy has electric stuff.

    This is not an anti-Stubbs post, I hope he turns out to be a good player. But he is in low A ball, not hitting a ton, while Lincecum is pitching well in the NL, and looks like a star.

    I'm sure this has been mentioned in prior posts, but the decision to pass on Lincecum may have been a major FO gaffe.

  5. #259
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    13,750

    Re: Not drafting Lincecum

    Did you know we landed on the moon?
    Go BLUE!!!

  6. #260
    Member membengal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern Maryland
    Posts
    13,813

    Re: Not drafting Lincecum

    Kc, you might want to work through this thread:
    Last edited by Red Leader; 05-30-2007 at 04:01 PM. Reason: Link to this thread from another

  7. #261
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,522

    Re: Lincecum opens up eyes at Giants camp

    Saw Lincecum live last night. Hard to justify not taking him in the last draft. Electric stuff, high 90's fastball, good off-speed. You can criticize his mechanics all you want, but Stubbs is in low A ball hitting .275.

    If Lincecum is handled properly, despite his height, he seems like a high-end talent, one that got away.

  8. #262
    Member NJReds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    5,435

    Re: Lincecum opens up eyes at Giants camp

    Quote Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
    Saw Lincecum live last night. Hard to justify not taking him in the last draft. Electric stuff, high 90's fastball, good off-speed. You can criticize his mechanics all you want, but Stubbs is in low A ball hitting .275.

    If Lincecum is handled properly, despite his height, he seems like a high-end talent, one that got away.
    I was at Shea as well last night. He was impressive, and I think he struggled getting his breaking stuff over in the later innings. But he's got a scary delivery that makes me think that that arm will fall off on any given pitch. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have him in a Reds uni...but he's not.

  9. #263
    Pitter Patter TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Letterkenny
    Posts
    21,928

    Re: Not drafting Lincecum

    I think this thread could be expanded based on the Gruler/Kazmir part of it.

    In the last 6 years, how many times did the Reds make a pick in the first round that got a collective <groan> from Redszone? Punting on Sowers instead of either signing him or anyone for that matter. The ridiculous contracts handed to David Espinoza and Dane Sardihna. I know we can go back further, Jeter, Garciaparra, Berkman, but let's look at recent history in the first round. Just how far back have the four GM's (JimBo, DanO, Kriv and the interims) set this organization. Which GM was an asset in this area?

    And where would the Reds be RIGHT NOW had the Redszone pick been taken?
    Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.

  10. #264
    Puffy's Daddy Red Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    20,422

    Re: Not drafting Lincecum

    I agree that this conversation could be linked to the other thread. Not blaming you in any way for starting a new one, Kc61, but I'm going to merge your thread into that existing thread for further conversation to continue on that one. That way we have all Lincecum-related discussion in one thread.
    'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.'
    -Snoop on his retirement

    Your Mom is happy.

  11. #265
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,522

    Re: Not drafting Lincecum

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Leader View Post
    I agree that this conversation could be linked to the other thread. Not blaming you in any way for starting a new one, Kc61, but I'm going to merge your thread into that existing thread for further conversation to continue on that one. That way we have all Lincecum-related discussion in one thread.
    Thank you. Good idea.

  12. #266
    Smells Like Teen Spirit jmcclain19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Phx
    Posts
    6,495

    Re: Lincecum opens up eyes at Giants camp

    Can you imagine right now a rotation of Kazmir, Lincecum, Bailey, Arroyo & Harang?

    It makes the mind boggle. I can tell you the Reds would likely won the division with Kazmir in the rotation and Lincecum in the pen last year.

  13. #267
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    4,672

    Re: Lincecum opens up eyes at Giants camp

    Quote Originally Posted by jmcclain19 View Post
    Can you imagine right now a rotation Hamels, Lincecum, Bailey, Arroyo & Harang?

    It makes the mind boggle. I can tell you the Reds would likely won the division with Hamels in the rotation and Lincecum in the pen last year.
    There, I fixed it for you. Hamels has been more impressive than Kazmir and my cyber-pick in 2002.

  14. #268
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    35,522

    Re: Lincecum opens up eyes at Giants camp

    Quote Originally Posted by jmcclain19 View Post
    Can you imagine right now a rotation of Kazmir, Lincecum, Bailey, Arroyo & Harang?

    It makes the mind boggle. I can tell you the Reds would likely won the division with Kazmir in the rotation and Lincecum in the pen last year.
    Since seeing Lincecum pitch yesterday, I've really wondered about this. Was Lincecum a surprise? So I went back and read the scouting reports on Lincecum from last year. Great fastball, great curve, improving change up, has a slider. Unusual mechanics, but never missed a game in college. Obviously a terrific prospect.

    When the Giants come to town, I hope somebody questions Krivsky about this. With Kazmir and Lincecum, the Reds are a very different team right now.

  15. #269
    Member NJReds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    5,435

    Re: Lincecum opens up eyes at Giants camp

    Two bad outings in a row for Lincecum. Has the league caught up to him, or is it all the 100+ pitch outings to start his career?

  16. #270
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,358

    Re: Lincecum opens up eyes at Giants camp

    Quote Originally Posted by NJReds View Post
    Two bad outings in a row for Lincecum. Has the league caught up to him, or is it all the 100+ pitch outings to start his career?
    He's been out of colege ball for about a year...he's gonna take some lumps when he's already in the show.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator