Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

  1. #1
    Making sense of it all Matt700wlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,519

    NL Central - worst division in modern history?


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    For a Level Playing Field RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Oakwood, OH
    Posts
    11,771

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    Interesting story... but I could care less about the division as a whole. I only care about one team in that division. I wish the rest of them would lose every out-of-division game. I'd like to see the NL Central have a combined out-of-division record of about 78-420 (.157)... the worst ever by a long shot. The REDS go 78-0 while the rest each go 0-78. That would be a great thing for the NL Central.
    Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.

  4. #3
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    43,280

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    Let's see middle of the country, rust belt cities in some cases and in most cases smaller TV networks and lower earning potential.

    This is as surprising as a a Bengal being arrested. It's somewhat amazing its been avoided for as long as it has already.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    4,672

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    Yeah, I bet the Cardinals are wishing they could do that Mulder for Haren/Barton deal over again. Mulder imploded like Danny Graves. Then we have a mysterious power dropoff by Pujols, Rolen looking washed up and Edmonds is washed up.

    The Central already had some resident bottom feeders, now add another.

  6. #5
    Member top6's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    cincinnati
    Posts
    1,656

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    Let's see middle of the country, rust belt cities in some cases and in most cases smaller TV networks and lower earning potential.

    This is as surprising as a a Bengal being arrested. It's somewhat amazing its been avoided for as long as it has already.
    There is really no reason, though, that the Cubs should not be one of the top teams in baseball. They are in a big market and are probably the most marketable team outside of the Yankees and Red Sox - and they may have more potential than even the Red Sox.

    Houston is also a large market - and in fact the Astros do have an impressive long-term record of success. St. Louis looks like it will always be an exception to the small market rule - again, in the long term.

    That said, with Milwaukee, Pittsburgh and Cincinnati, this division will always probably be pretty bad. All three of those teams may put together some shorter runs and nice years now and again, but given the factors you listed it will be tough to sustain long-term success - unless a Billy Beane-esque figure arises.

  7. #6
    Member Sea Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    15,629

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    Well, the division does have the defending world champ. It's way too early to call it the worst ever. In years past there have been some other divisions like the AL Central and AL West that have looked like a sub .500 would win it after two months.

  8. #7
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,914

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sea Ray View Post
    Well, the division does have the defending world champ. It's way too early to call it the worst ever. In years past there have been some other divisions like the AL Central and AL West that have looked like a sub .500 would win it after two months.
    Didnt the Padres win the NL West 2 years ago with an 82-80 record?

  9. #8
    CELEBRATION TIME RBA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    San Marcos, CA
    Posts
    13,987

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    Chicago is the number 3 market and Houston is number 10. St Louis isn't chop liver at Number 21 and Pittsburgh at 22. However, the other 2, not too good.

  10. #9
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    43,280

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    That said, with Milwaukee, Pittsburgh and Cincinnati, this division will always probably be pretty bad. All three of those teams may put together some shorter runs and nice years now and again, but given the factors you listed it will be tough to sustain long-term success - unless a Billy Beane-esque figure arises.
    Exactly, they counterbalance the Cubs (and somewhat the Astros) the Astros are like the Reds in one way, they share their Fox Network with a AL team, no big feeder like WGN for them. When looking at what is a monster market only Chicago stands out, St Louis stands out as how a smaller market but with less regional competition should do it. (Colorado and Arizona should look at the Cards to build their surrounding fan base.

  11. #10
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    34,549

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    Quote Originally Posted by top6 View Post
    There is really no reason, though, that the Cubs should not be one of the top teams in baseball.

    I can think of one.

    The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160

  12. #11
    Member red-in-la's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Santa Paula, CA
    Posts
    6,536

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    Quote Originally Posted by top6 View Post
    There is really no reason, though, that the Cubs should not be one of the top teams in baseball. They are in a big market and are probably the most marketable team outside of the Yankees and Red Sox - and they may have more potential than even the Red Sox.

    Houston is also a large market - and in fact the Astros do have an impressive long-term record of success. St. Louis looks like it will always be an exception to the small market rule - again, in the long term.

    That said, with Milwaukee, Pittsburgh and Cincinnati, this division will always probably be pretty bad. All three of those teams may put together some shorter runs and nice years now and again, but given the factors you listed it will be tough to sustain long-term success - unless a Billy Beane-esque figure arises.
    Call Buddy and suggest another reorganization......NL Central-HAVES and the NL Central-HAVE-NOTS.

    Then maybe the Reds, Pirates and Brewers could actually MAKE the playoffs...
    "Is there a problem officers?"

  13. #12
    Member top6's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    cincinnati
    Posts
    1,656

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    I can think of one.

    I figured someone would hit that softball out of the park.

  14. #13
    Kmac5 KoryMac5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Waterloo, NY
    Posts
    3,686

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    This is probably one of the worst divisions I can remember in a long time. If you just look at some of the losing streaks that have happened to many of the teams so far it tells you a lot about the baseball being played. The Reds have played terrible to begin the season yet are only out of 1st by what 8.5 games. Imagine if Boston was in our division we would be talking about football season in May.
    If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.

  15. #14
    Member Marc D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,776

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    The Astros announcers made a good Monty Python reference tonight and compared the NL central to a twit race.



  16. #15
    Haunted by walks
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    6,732

    Re: NL Central - worst division in modern history?

    Quote Originally Posted by red-in-la View Post
    Call Buddy and suggest another reorganization......NL Central-HAVES and the NL Central-HAVE-NOTS.

    Then maybe the Reds, Pirates and Brewers could actually MAKE the playoffs...
    How about the NL Central have-nots vs. the AL Central have-nots. Put the Chicagos with the New Yorks and L.A.s in the Superstation division. Put the big eastern markets in the Metropolitan division. Then there's the Sunbelt division and the Pacific Coast division.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25