Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member GullyFoyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    492

    MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    Some of you may remember that last year MLB was sued for trying to copyright players stats in order to force fantasy leagues to pay fees.

    MLB... "argues that through an agreement with the player's union, it alone has the right to use or permit the use of the player's names and likenesses. As statistics are such an integral part of baseball, they are an extension of the player's likeness: few people talk about Jim Thome's face, but his batting average is all-important to baseball fans. Therefore, in the eyes of MLB, the unlicensed CBC should be stopped from running fantasy leagues based on MLB stats."
    Link



    In august the court made the following ruling:

    A federal judge threw MLB a curveball yesterday, ruling that CBC Distribution (and other fantasy leagues) has every right to use game stats and player likenesses. In her ruling, Judge Mary Ann Medler found that the First Amendment takes precedence over MLB's "right of publicity." Since the stats that fantasy sites use are readily available in newspapers and online, they are not the exclusive property of MLB.
    Link


    Now MLB is back in Appeals court:

    In announcing plans to appeal the case, MLB decided that focusing on the stats was the wrong way to go. "We've agreed that the stats and names are in the public domain," MLB Advanced Media spokesman Gallagher said after the ruling. "But when you start to use team's logos and other images as CBC did, you need a license, it's that simple."

    Instead, MLB's lawyers once again made the argument that publicity rights were of paramount concern, according to the AP. One of MLB's attorneys said that a fantasy league using names and stats without permission was analogous to a company printing posters or coffee mugs with pictures of players on them without permission. The judges appeared to be skeptical of MLB's arguments. "MLB is like a public religion. Everyone knows (the players') names and what they look like," opined U.S. Judge Morris Arnold. "This is just part of being an American, isn't it?"
    Link


    I'm not sure how many have been watching, but MLB is upset that people are making money with "their" statistics. Now that they have conceded that stats are in the public domain it sounds like they are saying you can use the stats but you can't use the players names or likenesses.

    If this is a dupe thread feel free to remove. But I thought this was an interesting legal battle. When does public celebrity cause names and likenesses to enter into the public domain.

    Some of RZ's legal experts can probably put more light on the subject but it looks like MLB is going to have a tough argument on their hands.

  2. #2
    Reds Slacker '07 RedsMan3203's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    3,784

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    I don't understand why MLB would be doing this.... Its rather stupid to me...

    Because if they get to "own" their stats, and no one else gets to use them... Then they are going to lose ALOT more money when people stop watching the game, and stop going to it.

    If they think they are losing money now, wait till they get their way....
    You think you got what it takes to play a real fantasy game? Join me at Jockstocks. You can play Baseball, Basketball, Football, Golf, Nascar and even Hockey!

    Jockstocks Homepage

    Do you have your shirt on? - Adam Dunn to Marty on the Bananna Phone.

  3. #3
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    25,047

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    Intellectual property law is simply absurd in most cases.

  4. #4
    Harry Chiti Fan registerthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    5,872

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    Let MLB try to wring additional dollars out of the TV, newspaper and radio outlets that continually publish names, teams, and player statistics. because I fail to see a difference from what, for instance, the Washington Post sports section is doing, and what a fantasy baseball league is doing.

    MLB just looks ridiculous in this case--worse than the RIAA suing grandma.
    We'll burn that bridge when we get to it.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    The Bush Leagues
    Posts
    9,230

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    Intellectual property law is simply absurd in most cases.

    Ebay's getting sued over their "Buy It Now" button. That's just silly.
    The widow is gathering nettles for her children's dinner; a perfumed seigneur, delicately lounging in the Oeil de Boeuf, hath an alchemy whereby he will extract the third nettle and call it rent. ~ Carlyle

  6. #6
    Man Pills
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    25,047

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    Quote Originally Posted by Rojo View Post
    Ebay's getting sued over their "Buy It Now" button. That's just silly.
    I'm going to copyright the smell of my farts.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    The Bush Leagues
    Posts
    9,230

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    I'm going to copyright the smell of my farts.
    I wouldn't worry about infringement.
    The widow is gathering nettles for her children's dinner; a perfumed seigneur, delicately lounging in the Oeil de Boeuf, hath an alchemy whereby he will extract the third nettle and call it rent. ~ Carlyle

  8. #8
    Five Tool Fool jojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    19,062

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    Intellectual property law is simply absurd in most cases.
    HIGH FIVE
    "This isnít stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner

  9. #9
    Member smith288's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    New Albany, OH
    Posts
    7,252

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    I dont care what MLB thinks is unfair. They are exempt from a monopoly. Any ruling should really be looked at with that in mind.

  10. #10
    Unsolicited Opinions traderumor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Right Down Broadway
    Posts
    18,678

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    I'm sure the $ impact must be significant. I can't see them carrying on this argument for a matter of principle.

  11. #11
    Harry Chiti Fan registerthis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    5,872

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    Quote Originally Posted by traderumor View Post
    I'm sure the $ impact must be significant. I can't see them carrying on this argument for a matter of principle.
    I don't see them carrying on *any* argument as a matter of principle.
    We'll burn that bridge when we get to it.

  12. #12
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    11,195

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    Interestingly, the NCAA is running down a similar path as told this NY Times article about a blogger for the Louisville Courier-Journal doing a live blog of the Louisville Oklahoma State baseball game. This is similar to what Trent does on his blog. The NCAA argues that it violates their agreements with reporters and they're considering it a "live broadcast" subject to their approval. I think they're missing the boat too (and to boot, they cutting off their nose to spite their face as the blog allows real-time interest in their product. Very short sighted.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/14/sp...prod=permalink

    I think MLB's being greedy and they ultimately risk losing their anti-trust immunity, I think.

  13. #13
    Member smith288's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    New Albany, OH
    Posts
    7,252

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    Quote Originally Posted by redsmetz View Post
    Interestingly, the NCAA is running down a similar path as told this NY Times article about a blogger for the Louisville Courier-Journal doing a live blog of the Louisville Oklahoma State baseball game. This is similar to what Trent does on his blog. The NCAA argues that it violates their agreements with reporters and they're considering it a "live broadcast" subject to their approval. I think they're missing the boat too (and to boot, they cutting off their nose to spite their face as the blog allows real-time interest in their product. Very short sighted.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/14/sp...prod=permalink

    I think MLB's being greedy and they ultimately risk losing their anti-trust immunity, I think.
    So they think we arent allowed to report our experiences regarding the venue while you are there? Niiice.

  14. #14
    Haunted by walks
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    6,712

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    The game threads would be at risk, if they could find any evidence that we were actually following the game.

    I wonder if we'll have to start speaking in code, referring to Abner Dean, Edward Carnation and Kurt Grimley Jr.

  15. #15
    Member smith288's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    New Albany, OH
    Posts
    7,252

    Re: MLB trying to Copyright Stats, continued

    Quote Originally Posted by BCubb2003 View Post
    The game threads would be at risk, if they could find any evidence that we were actually following the game.

    I wonder if we'll have to start speaking in code, referring to Abner Dean, Edward Carnation and Kurt Grimley Jr.
    "Fantastic bowl ole' chap. That finishes off the set as each batsman is dismissed..."


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25