Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

  1. #1
    Member reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    29,518

    Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    Per Trent

    Moeller just won't go away.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Senor Votto
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,953

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    We. Don't. Need. Three. Catchers.

  4. #3
    Time is the Revelator.
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN
    Posts
    7,281

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    Same game, different name. Pathetic.

  5. #4
    Member OesterPoster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    West-central Ohio
    Posts
    2,412

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    Only the Reds would replace an injured outfielder with a crappy catcher. I give up.

  6. #5
    Talkin' Baseball
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The 'Nati
    Posts
    278

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    Yep, if they weren't going to use that move to get Homer back for his next start, then why not use it to get Votto a few ABs with Hatte still on the roster. Of course, I think they are keeping Votto down to learn left in case they move Dunn. He's got nothing left to prove at the dish.

  7. #6
    thorn
    Guest

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    Didn't we just promote Bruce to LOU because they are so badly lacking in OF's? Maybe he just didn't want to take another OF from LOU due to the shortage they have. Besides, Moeller will be sent back down in a few days when Bailey returns.

  8. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    275

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    Good God

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    509

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    I thought it was pretty much "assumed" that if he went on the dl, that then homer could come back sooner than the 10 days......this does not make much sense

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,187

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    It Looks Like WK wants the #1 pick after all.
    The Hunt for a Reds October.

  11. #10
    got alil captain in u?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bridgeport Ohio
    Posts
    4,839

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    i guess wayne couldn't go to long without a player on the bench who can't hit to save his life. He had to find somebody to replace castro in the suckyness department.

  12. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    710

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    Homer, Bruce and Votto will all be called up at the same time.

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    509

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    Quote Originally Posted by Fullboat View Post
    It Looks Like WK wants the #1 pick after all.
    Thats assuming that he isnt a scott boras client or also wants the moon to sign....

  14. #13
    Member kaldaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    17,891

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    Quote Originally Posted by Grande Donkey View Post
    Homer, Bruce and Votto will all be called up at the same time.
    The board would have a meltdown when that happened, and I'd love it. (Not now of course, but when the time is right)

  15. #14
    High five!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    6,976

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    I think Trent put it best so I shall C&P from this post:

    As for Moeller, it's a pretty easy move. That way he goes down when Bobby Livingston gets the call for Monday (that has not been announced, but that's what I'd expect). Lopez stays up with Castro out, and then the pitcher who gets called up goes down when Homer's ready to come back up. Really, it's not anything to get upset about. With Freel and Hopper already here, it's not like they needed another outfielder, they're heavy on the outfielders already. With Keppinger and Lopez already up, you have bats that can play in the infield (although, Lopez was hot the last month with the Bats, I'd still rather have Javy on the bench). Javy will be pinch hitting and you can switch for him at some time if you want now that you have a third catcher. Really, for a move like this, there's no reason to get your undies in a bunch, as it seems many of you have. It's for one series for a team that's already out of it. Seriously, settle down.

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    867

    Re: Hamilton to DL, Moeller Back

    I would rather carry 24 men.. than have Moeller up here..


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator