Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: its time to cut Saarloos

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mt. Lookout
    Posts
    240

    its time to cut Saarloos

    Why is Kirk Saarloos still on the team? Is there no one else we can bring up or sign? He gives up a run seemingly every time he pitches. This is the second time he hasn't even recorded an out. Does anyone have any explanation for him still being on the team?


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,040

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    With out a doubt.

    Has Santos signed with anyone since we released him.... maybe we can get him back.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    I would rather have Ricky Stone back than Saarloos.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati/Colerain
    Posts
    1,289

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    I wanna see Bill Bray.

  6. #5
    Kneel before Zod Cant Touch This's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    677

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    Nothing like an afternoon cup of Coffey to wash down a helping of Saarloos. Throwing those two out there in a tie game is like Ned Yost opening a Wonka bar to discover a golden ticket. Not that there are any better options, mind you, so can't really fault Mac.
    A flute with no holes is not a flute. A doughnut with no holes is a danish. -- Zen Philosopher Basho

  7. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    13

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    If there isn't anybody at Louisville who can do better than Saarloos, the Reds really have a problem.

  8. #7
    RotoHester
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jeffersonville, IN
    Posts
    493

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    I would have to say I am extremlely disappointed in Saarloos this season. When he was brought in during the offseason I was excited about his potential. Being a groundball pitcher that showed flashes of great ability while pitching for Oakland I thought he may be one of the Reds breakout players this season. Unfortunately he's been a train wreck! It has to be time to get Bray and even Maj back up here and see what they can do.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati/Colerain
    Posts
    1,289

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    Quote Originally Posted by redsfandoug View Post
    If there isn't anybody at Louisville who can do better than Saarloos, the Reds really have a problem.

    Yea, Bill Bray and probably even Gary Majewski.

  10. #9
    Roster glue
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ft. Thomas
    Posts
    569

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    Quote Originally Posted by Muggerd View Post
    With out a doubt.

    Has Santos signed with anyone since we released him.... maybe we can get him back.
    Santos accepted his assignment to AAA; the Reds still have him. He has a 1.93 ERA in Louisville.

    The difference between he and Saarloos:

    A) Saarloos has options and can be sent to Louisville without exposing him to waivers

    B) Santos has not been seen hemorrhaging runs and baserunners at the big league level as recently

    Picking between these two is like asking whether you want to eat mayonnaise that has sat in the sun for three weeks or a month.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Wallingford, CT via Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    318

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    Saarloos/Coffey out.

    Bray and Salmon in.

    That wasn't too hard, Wayne.
    I'm not a hooligan. I'm a Reds supporter.

    Hooray Beer!

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,040

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    Quote Originally Posted by boognish View Post
    Santos accepted his assignment to AAA; the Reds still have him. He has a 1.93 ERA in Louisville.

    The difference between he and Saarloos:

    A) Saarloos has options and can be sent to Louisville without exposing him to waivers

    B) Santos has not been seen hemorrhaging runs and baserunners at the big league level as recently

    Picking between these two is like asking whether you want to eat mayonnaise that has sat in the sun for three weeks or a month.
    Im being sarcastic about Santos

  13. #12
    Member reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    29,518

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    Quote Originally Posted by DeadRedinCT View Post
    Saarloos/Coffey out.

    Bray and Salmon in.

    That wasn't too hard, Wayne.
    Throw Stanton in and bring McBeth back.

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    152

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    said on the game recap that the last 10 batters saarloos has faced have all reached base. 8 hits, 1 walk, 1 hbp.

    i'm not even upset. that's amazing!

  15. #14
    got alil captain in u?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bridgeport Ohio
    Posts
    4,839

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    i agree i've seen enough

  16. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    113

    Re: its time to cut Saarloos

    Quote Originally Posted by boognish View Post
    Santos accepted his assignment to AAA; the Reds still have him. He has a 1.93 ERA in Louisville.

    The difference between he and Saarloos:

    A) Saarloos has options and can be sent to Louisville without exposing him to waivers

    .
    He would clear waivers quicker than Ricky Stone

    and what would we be losing if someone else did pick him up?


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator