Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: A real smallball team

  1. #1
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    A real smallball team

    very interesting read

    Real-Deal Paragons

    by Joe Sheehan

    I want to take a look at an old friend today. You may recall that in 2005 and 2006, I spent a lot of time talking about a statistic that, to me, put the lie to the narrative about the best AL teams in those seasons. The “smallball” White Sox of ’05 were actually among the teams most reliant on the longball, with 42.4 percent of their runs scored on homers. That mark was fourth in MLB, and third in the AL. They hit homers, they pitched well, and they played defense, and the one-run strategies that they utililized didn’t have much at all to do with their championship.
    Tigers’ bona fides as an old-fashioned baseball team, especially with the White Sox becoming even more, and more obviously, reliant on the long ball. The Tigers, however, were a carbon copy of the 2005 champs at the plate, a low-OBP, high-slugging team that relied on a short-sequence offense to score. They were also among the MLB leaders in the percentage of their runs scored on homers.

    The two teams’ good pitching and defense were the keys to their success, to be sure, and that’s what many people in the mainstream media lighted upon in anointing their particular brand of baseball superior. The offenses, however, were as power-centric as any we’ve seen in the past few seasons. I’m not a big fan of attaching moral qualities to the ways in which teams win baseball games, and I’m even less attracted to the notion of making up things in the process of doing so.

    In 2007, we’re not reading these stories. There’s no team that’s said to be running and bunting and smallballing its way to the top, and we’ve been spared the invented storylines about how one team’s success is a throwback to an earlier era.

    Even as it’s actually happening.

    The Los Angeles Angels hold a two-game lead in the AL West, losing no ground while facing the Yankees to start off this week by first rallying for a 7-6 extra-inning comeback win on Monday, then pounding the Bombers last night. They are less reliant on the home run for their runs than any team in baseball, and it’s not terribly close. Through Monday's games, Angels have scored a mere 22.8 percent of their runs on homers, and the overall figures of 88 homers and 143 runs on homers are both 28th in MLB. The Angels are what the media thought the 2005 White Sox were: a paean to the value of winning without going deep.

    They’re not a bad offensive team, either. In fact, the Angels in 2007 have a better EqA than either of the two teams listed above, and despite lacking much in the way of home run power, they have a slightly-above-average offense—a .261 EqA that ranks seventh in the AL and 14th in MLB. The Angels hit for a high batting average (.282), a key trait whenever they have a successful season which also enables them to have an above-average OBP (.341), the most important element in any offense. They hit doubles (260, fourth in the AL) and they steal bases (114, first in the AL, at a 72.6 percent clip, a positive rate). Dan Fox’s research shows that they also pick up some runs on the bases in ways besides stealing them.

    Why isn’t this a bigger story? Well, I think it’s in part because the Angels have been playing this style, more or less, since Mike Scioscia arrived. This year’s team is an extreme application of the principle, but the Angels haven’t been that reliant on the long ball in the 2000s. Rather than turning a bad team into a good one and making a story out of it, the Angels are simply doing what they’ve done for most of the decade, and there’s not much of a fresh storyline there.

    Mariners team just two behind them, are probably going to enter the postseason as the #2 team in the AL. I’ll stand by the idea that the offense only works when the team bats .280, but sometimes you’re going to hit .280, and they don’t make you give back the playoff shares just because your plan actually worked.

    Here’s the full list of teams, in order of their percentage of runs scored on homers. Thanks to Bil Burke for putting this together:

    Code:
    Year   Team     R      HR   R on HR  Pct
    2007    MIL    597    177    277    .464
    2007    CIN    591    163    255    .431
    2007    CHA    531    137    217    .409
    2007    FLO    604    153    235    .389
    2007    OAK    562    133    218    .388
    2007    HOU    557    127    213    .382
    2007    CLE    613    138    233    .380
    2007    TEX    584    131    218    .373
    2007    ARI    539    131    198    .367
    2007    PHI    670    155    243    .363
    2007    SDN    534    118    188    .352
    2007    NYA    741    156    260    .351
    2007    TBA    558    134    195    .349
    2007    ATL    626    135    218    .348
    2007    NYN    593    133    205    .346
    2007    TOR    566    124    190    .336
    2007    DET    692    141    229    .331
    2007    SEA    613    118    198    .323
    2007    SFN    539    102    173    .321
    2007    SLN    543    111    174    .320
    2007    COL    629    119    200    .318
    2007    BOS    643    120    196    .305
    2007    WAS    486     85    146    .300
    2007    BAL    565     95    168    .297
    2007    PIT    553    111    161    .291
    2007    MIN    552     93    159    .288
    2007    CHN    575    102    164    .285
    2007    LAN    547     90    140    .256
    2007    KCA    566     83    133    .235
    2007    ANA    626     88    143    .228
    The thing to take away is that how you score really has no bearing on winning and losing.
    Last edited by flyer85; 08-22-2007 at 01:12 PM.
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    11,284

    Re: A real smallball team

    Code:
    Year   Team     R      HR   R on HR  Pct
    2007    MIL    597    177    277    .464
    2007    CIN    591    163    255    .431
    2007    CHA    531    137    217    .409
    2007    FLO    604    153    235    .389
    2007    OAK    562    133    218    .388
    2007    HOU    557    127    213    .382
    2007    CLE    613    138    233    .380
    2007    TEX    584    131    218    .373
    2007    ARI    539    131    198    .367
    2007    PHI    670    155    243    .363
    2007    SDN    534    118    188    .352
    2007    NYA    741    156    260    .351
    2007    TBA    558    134    195    .349
    2007    ATL    626    135    218    .348
    2007    NYN    593    133    205    .346
    2007    TOR    566    124    190    .336
    2007    DET    692    141    229    .331
    2007    SEA    613    118    198    .323
    2007    SFN    539    102    173    .321
    2007    SLN    543    111    174    .320
    2007    COL    629    119    200    .318
    2007    BOS    643    120    196    .305
    2007    WAS    486     85    146    .300
    2007    BAL    565     95    168    .297
    2007    PIT    553    111    161    .291
    2007    MIN    552     93    159    .288
    2007    CHN    575    102    164    .285
    2007    LAN    547     90    140    .256
    2007    KCA    566     83    133    .235
    2007    ANA    626     88    143    .228
    I think your comment is correct - I've highlighted the division leaders in red (including both the Cubs and the Brewers) and they're all over the place, including the top and the bottom.

  4. #3
    Vampire Weekend @Bernie's camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    11,491

    Re: A real smallball team

    Code:
    Year   Team     R      HR   R on HR  Pct
    2007    MIL    597    177    277    .464
    2007    CIN    591    163    255    .431
    2007    CHA    531    137    217    .409
    2007    FLO    604    153    235    .389
    2007    OAK    562    133    218    .388
    2007    HOU    557    127    213    .382
    2007    CLE    613    138    233    .380
    2007    TEX    584    131    218    .373
    2007    ARI    539    131    198    .367
    2007    PHI    670    155    243    .363
    2007    SDN    534    118    188    .352
    2007    NYA    741    156    260    .351
    2007    TBA    558    134    195    .349
    2007    ATL    626    135    218    .348
    2007    NYN    593    133    205    .346
    2007    TOR    566    124    190    .336
    2007    DET    692    141    229    .331
    2007    SEA    613    118    198    .323
    2007    SFN    539    102    173    .321
    2007    SLN    543    111    174    .320
    2007    COL    629    119    200    .318
    2007    BOS    643    120    196    .305
    2007    WAS    486     85    146    .300
    2007    BAL    565     95    168    .297
    2007    PIT    553    111    161    .291
    2007    MIN    552     93    159    .288
    2007    CHN    575    102    164    .285
    2007    LAN    547     90    140    .256
    2007    KCA    566     83    133    .235
    2007    ANA    626     88    143    .228
    I put the teams with winning records in blue. What this list tells me is that having a balance between of power abilities and small ball abilities is ideal, but if you don't have an incredibly-high budget (i.e. Anaheim, Boston, Chicago), then building a successful team around power will be cheaper. I'm not saying that as fact; I'm just saying, coincidental or not, there's a correlation this year.

  5. #4
    This one's for you Edd Heath's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Dayton Area
    Posts
    8,471

    Re: A real smallball team

    Rank the Pitching next to the hitting.........
    Some people play baseball. Baseball plays Jay Bruce.

  6. #5
    Vampire Weekend @Bernie's camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    11,491

    Re: A real smallball team

    Code:
    Year   Team     R      HR   R on HR  Pct     ERA
    2007    MIL    597    177    277    .464    4.49
    2007    CIN    591    163    255    .431    5.02
    2007    CHA    531    137    217    .409    4.82
    2007    FLO    604    153    235    .389    4.67
    2007    OAK    562    133    218    .388    3.95
    2007    HOU    557    127    213    .382    4.73
    2007    CLE    613    138    233    .380    4.27
    2007    TEX    584    131    218    .373    4.81
    2007    ARI    539    131    198    .367    4.12
    2007    PHI    670    155    243    .363    4.73
    2007    SDN    534    118    188    .352    3.52
    2007    NYA    741    156    260    .351    4.49
    2007    TBA    558    134    195    .349    5.74
    2007    ATL    626    135    218    .348    4.23
    2007    NYN    593    133    205    .346    3.98
    2007    TOR    566    124    190    .336    4.01
    2007    DET    692    141    229    .331    4.69
    2007    SEA    613    118    198    .323    4.58
    2007    SFN    539    102    173    .321    4.10
    2007    SLN    543    111    174    .320    4.62
    2007    COL    629    119    200    .318    4.41
    2007    BOS    643    120    196    .305    3.78
    2007    WAS    486     85    146    .300    4.49
    2007    BAL    565     95    168    .297    4.39
    2007    PIT    553    111    161    .291    4.82
    2007    MIN    552     93    159    .288    4.11
    2007    CHN    575    102    164    .285    4.03
    2007    LAN    547     90    140    .256    4.02
    2007    KCA    566     83    133    .235    4.47
    2007    ANA    626     88    143    .228    4.16

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    4,101

    Re: A real smallball team

    Quote Originally Posted by Heath View Post
    Rank the Pitching next to the hitting.........
    Yeah! What he said!

  8. #7
    Designated Threadkiller LincolnparkRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,791

    Re: A real smallball team

    well at least were not last overall. Think where we would be without Harang and all of his innings
    Climbing down from the bridge, but keeping the torch lit until Dusty's fate is settled


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25