Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Interesting Note (Involving Reds) About Instant Replay

  1. #1
    Member SultanOfSwing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    Posts
    329

    Interesting Note (Involving Reds) About Instant Replay

    From Sports Illustrated's Jon Heyman:

    "The Daily Scoop" - Wednesday November 7, 2007

    The holdouts in the vote to support limited use of instant replay (which passed 25-5) were the Reds, Cubs, Astros, Brewers and Twins.
    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...dnesday/2.html

    What do you think? It seems everyone in the Central except for the Pirates doesn't want instant replay. Any ideas?

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    He sure could hit HalMorrisRules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    703

    Re: Interesting Note (Involving Reds) About Instant Replay

    Cardinals voted for it too. As far as why 4 of the Central GM's voted against it, you got me. Maybe they are just staunch supporters of tradition.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,189

    Re: Interesting Note (Involving Reds) About Instant Replay

    probably because they dont want it to expand to other areas.

  5. #4
    Member mroby85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,282

    Re: Interesting Note (Involving Reds) About Instant Replay

    they probably figure they win more games based on bad calls than they lose, lol.

  6. #5
    REDSBROWNSBUCKEYES
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Dayton Ohio
    Posts
    771

    Re: Interesting Note (Involving Reds) About Instant Replay

    Quote Originally Posted by mroby85 View Post
    they probably figure they win more games based on bad calls than they lose, lol.
    Agreed, the Reds being less fundamentaly sound for the most part would lead to more close plays, thus leading to more instances of close calls if the rule is expanded to all areas of the game.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Findlay & Western
    Posts
    227

    Re: Interesting Note (Involving Reds) About Instant Replay

    Don't like it. I won the "Big Payoff Inning" years back on a Brett Boone HR against the Cubs that was way foul. Marty almost forgot to give me the number.

  8. #7
    The Future GoReds33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    2,463

    Re: Interesting Note (Involving Reds) About Instant Replay

    I don't know why they would vote against it. From what I hear it was just exploring fair or foul, and homerun calls. What's wrong with that? I know it would be taking it too far if it was on out plays and stuff like that, but this certainly seems reasonable.
    If you can't build a winning team with that core a fire-sale isn't the solution. Selling the franchise, moving them to Nashville and converting GABP into a used car lot is.
    -LTlabner

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    way-east of cincinnati
    Posts
    1,164

    Re: Interesting Note (Involving Reds) About Instant Replay

    Un-like football, baseball umpires are pros, who get it right. There are always those plays that the field call blows, but the # umpires get right is staggering, when compared to NFL refs. As a game that develops much slower than Football, added delays will slow it down even more. I could agree with limited use of re-play, but these decisions have a way of preparing for further impingements. Was he under the tag on a steal attempt? Did the ball get there before the runner? If so, did the player make the tag in time? Was the pitch too high to be called a strike? The pitcher balked, or did he? My head is starting to hurt..

  10. #9
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Midland, MI
    Posts
    6,414

    Re: Interesting Note (Involving Reds) About Instant Replay

    As an umpire, I am for limited use of instant replay because my main goal is to get the call right...
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25