Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Roger Clemens, Miguel Tejada, and The Grimsley report

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    130

    Roger Clemens, Miguel Tejada, and The Grimsley report

    Anyone curious as to why the feds or anyone for that matter has not bothered to pursue the allegations that Grimsley named Clemens, Tejada, Pettitte, etc, as users of performance enhancing drugs?

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    148

    Re: Roger Clemens, Miguel Tejada, and The Grimsley report

    How do you know its not being pursued, and that we just don't know about it. Their names could even be in the Mitchell Report for all we know, right now we just have to wait and see.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    130

    Re: Roger Clemens, Miguel Tejada, and The Grimsley report

    Quote Originally Posted by zjr1717 View Post
    How do you know its not being pursued, and that we just don't know about it. Their names could even be in the Mitchell Report for all we know, right now we just have to wait and see.
    You are right, I shouldn't assume it's not being pursued.

    I was just curious about it because I was reading a time-line regarding steroids, and I came across it, and it seems since last year it was swept under the rug.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    187

    Re: Roger Clemens, Miguel Tejada, and The Grimsley report

    Even if they did do them it is not on the level of what Bonds did, he perjured himself. That is why he is in trouble!

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    130

    Re: Roger Clemens, Miguel Tejada, and The Grimsley report

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigredfan#1 View Post
    Even if they did do them it is not on the level of what Bonds did, he perjured himself. That is why he is in trouble!
    Well, they weren't called to testify infront of a judge. Had they been, I guarantee atleast one of them would of lied.

    And for what it's worth, this isn't to defend Bonds. I was just curious as to why this was particular swept under the rug. But it may be possible that all of this will be on the mitchell report.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Centerville,OH
    Posts
    678

    Re: Roger Clemens, Miguel Tejada, and The Grimsley report

    I believe the Grimsley investigation was a part of the investigation that brought down the Florida and NY pharmacy for illegally distributing HGH. Baseball has had problems working with the Feds in the investigation so all the names from the Florida pharmacy have not been released.

  8. #7
    Firin Away Jr's Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,750

    Re: Roger Clemens, Miguel Tejada, and The Grimsley report

    Yes it does bother me,and i'm glad you started this thread.This whole steroid issue is way bigger than Bonds.Though the press has chosen to vilify and destroy Bonds because they never liked him in the first place.If Bonds perjured himself than he'll have to deal with the consequences.However Harold ''Bud''Selig needs to quit trying to hide and sweep under the rug a situation that will just worsen as it progress's with no repurcussions other than a slap on the wrist.And ''getting out of bed''with the players union is a start.
    Last edited by Jr's Boy; 11-18-2007 at 09:16 PM.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    2,161

    Re: Roger Clemens, Miguel Tejada, and The Grimsley report

    Linebrinck signs for $3.5M?!?! Only if it's incentive laden, like Weathers, but with option years that vest.

    NOBODY would be happier if we released Stanton. The only thing better would be if he RETIRES, which he should do if he had an ounce of pride.

    If the ONLY thing Dusty Baker does, is help us get Kerry Wood to sign for $4.25M, it will be a coup.

    However, I don't see us getting THREE Free Agent RP's for $2.5M+, not with Gosling, Couter, and a few other Lougies that come cheap the next few years, we only have Bray from what I see; we AT MOST will sign two RP's IMO.

    Matt Cain would be another COUP, and Kris Benson I could live with at #5.

    Not a bad take overall.

    PEACE

    -BLEEDS


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25