Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Garland to the Angels

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    390

    Garland to the Angels

    http://www.rotoworld.com/content/Hea...=MLB&hl=226455

    I'm glad he has been traded and not to thr Reds. I just didn't think his numbers projected well in GABP. then again I would have taken him over Milton.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Quiet Reverence Vada Pinson Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    800

    Re: Garland to the Angels

    Garland, as a former 18 game winner, obviously has the knowledge and arm to pitch. We can't look at every pitcher and think of Eric Milton. It's difficult to say but at some point you have to hope a big investment type player works out for the Reds. What a pitcher or every day player does one year is never a given as to what will happen next year. Only an indicator but not absolute. I realize he had a so-so year last season 10-13.

    I think the Angels will be better for acquiring Garland than not. As scarce as good pitching is to acquire, I wish it was the Reds getting Wayne Garland. Sorry, I meant Jon Garland. I just edited my mistake. The memory isn't what it used to be. Please excuse my error.

    Happy Thanksgiving Everyone,
    Last edited by Vada Pinson Fan; 11-19-2007 at 04:47 PM.

  4. #3
    Battle Toad Historian thatcoolguy_22's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    in tornado alley
    Posts
    1,744

    Re: Garland to the Angels

    http://www.thebaseballcube.com/playe...-Garland.shtml

    John Garland

    27 years old, 4 consecutive years of over 200 IP, BB rate below 2.5 in last 3 years, GB% 45% average the last 3 years, K/9 rate below 5 the last 4 years...

    Appears to be the definition of a number 3 starter.


    Orlando Cabrera

    http://www.thebaseballcube.com/playe...-Cabrera.shtml

    32 year old SS coming off the his 2nd gg, a career year where he had a .345 OBP and slugged .397 while stealing 20 bases.




    Who Won IMO

    Neither team

    The White Sox traded the little amount of pitching depth they had for a 32 year old SS that is making 8.5 million per. Garland is not the dominant starter that his W/L record would indicate from 05 and 06. He is a pitcher that will walk less than 2 batters a game while striking out less than 5 to boot. This trade appears to be a bigger deal than what it is IMO
    "Last week I helped my friend stay put. It's a lot easier'n helpin' 'em move. I just went over to his house and made sure that he did not start to load **** into a truck."

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Amarillo,Texas
    Posts
    4,289

    Re: Garland to the Angels

    We should have traded Gonzalez or Keppinger for Jon Garland.

  6. #5
    Battle Toad Historian thatcoolguy_22's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    in tornado alley
    Posts
    1,744

    Re: Garland to the Angels

    trade the best defensive SS we have seen in a Reds' uni since a young Barry Larkin, for a number 3 SP that has a a K/9 rate that hovers around 4.5 every year? That would have been disastrous. He has around a 45% GB rate and with Jeff "I only have more range than David Wells circa 2007" Keppinger he would have been crushed here at Great American Smallpark. Too many baserunners... Plus he is a 10million a year guy with only 1 year left on his contract
    "Last week I helped my friend stay put. It's a lot easier'n helpin' 'em move. I just went over to his house and made sure that he did not start to load **** into a truck."

  7. #6
    Member Jay Bruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    193

    Re: Garland to the Angels

    Quote Originally Posted by thatcoolguy_22 View Post
    trade the best defensive SS we have seen in a Reds' uni since a young Barry Larkin, for a number 3 SP that has a a K/9 rate that hovers around 4.5 every year? That would have been disastrous. He has around a 45% GB rate and with Jeff "I only have more range than David Wells circa 2007" Keppinger he would have been crushed here at Great American Smallpark. Too many baserunners... Plus he is a 10million a year guy with only 1 year left on his contract
    It's actually 12 million for the year . Other than that, I cannot disagree with one thing you just said. These are the exact reasons that would have made Garland an awful target for the Reds to acquire.

  8. #7
    The Future GoReds33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    2,462

    Re: Garland to the Angels

    I like Garland. He is a good pitcher. I think that the White Sox got the best end of this deal. I think that Cabrera is a good shortstop. I think that he still has some gas in the tank. Another aspect is that Juan Uribe can still be traded, which basically would be all profit.
    If you can't build a winning team with that core a fire-sale isn't the solution. Selling the franchise, moving them to Nashville and converting GABP into a used car lot is.
    -LTlabner

  9. #8
    Member PickOff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,338

    Re: Garland to the Angels

    Quote Originally Posted by thatcoolguy_22 View Post
    trade the best defensive SS we have seen in a Reds' uni since a young Barry Larkin, for a number 3 SP that has a a K/9 rate that hovers around 4.5 every year? That would have been disastrous. He has around a 45% GB rate and with Jeff "I only have more range than David Wells circa 2007" Keppinger he would have been crushed here at Great American Smallpark. Too many baserunners... Plus he is a 10million a year guy with only 1 year left on his contract
    A young Barry Larkin? Gonzo had a horrible season defensively, posting worse stats and playing time than Barry when Barry was 38.

    I realize errors, FB, and range factor have many flaws, but nonetheless

    2002 Barry 38, 135gms, 12 e, +.009 FP, +.15 RFg

    2007 Gonzo 30, 103gms, 16 e, -.012 FP, -.01 Rfg

    Barry was better than the league and Gonzo worse in FP and Rfg, and there was a large discrepency in errors.

    Gonzo is somewhat overated as a defensive shortstop and inconsistent year to year. He is league average at best currently. The fielding bible had him slightly above this year after ranking first last year. He is a disappointment to me, and I find him hard to watch.
    Last edited by PickOff; 11-20-2007 at 03:07 PM.
    Thank goodness for baseball.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    175

    Re: Garland to the Angels

    I can't say that I like this deal at all. They traded away one of their more solid, dependable starters for another bat, which they really didn't need (who happens to be 32 by the way). Now they will be an even OLDER team come opening day next year.:thumbdown

  11. #10
    WOOOOO!!! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Midland, MI
    Posts
    6,366

    Re: Garland to the Angels

    Quote Originally Posted by GoGoWhiteSox View Post
    I can't say that I like this deal at all. They traded away one of their more solid, dependable starters for another bat, which they really didn't need (who happens to be 32 by the way). Now they will be an even OLDER team come opening day next year.:thumbdown
    yes but Cabrera has one year on his deal and could be gone after the season, same as Garland, so their respective ages matter very little...
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25