Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

  1. #1
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,289

    Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    Milb.com is starting to release its Top 50 Prospect list today with #41-50. Surprisingly they have Johnny Cueto at #47 overall.

    I have Cueto at #15 overall on my list, but could see him falling somewhere between 10-25 on mosts lists, but 47 is way too low for me. Yeah, he is short.... but is that really dropping him that far down the list?

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Something clever pahster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    1,908

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    Cueto's not tall enough to sell a nice pair of jeans.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    9,850

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    I would think of him (and Votto) more in the 20-30 range. 47 does seem a bit low.
    Last edited by Benihana; 11-26-2007 at 01:43 PM.
    Go BLUE!!!

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    8,840

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    47 seems ridculously low. I won't pretend to know all the players that will make the top 50, but I would've thought Cueto would've been a top 25 kind of guy.

  6. #5
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,289

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    Quote Originally Posted by fearofpopvol1 View Post
    47 seems ridculously low. I won't pretend to know all the players that will make the top 50, but I would've thought Cueto would've been a top 25 kind of guy.
    I will be VERY surprised if he is any lower than 30 on any list that comes out from this point forward.

  7. #6
    The Future GoReds33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    2,463

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    I can't stand these things. The only reason he isn't higher is because he's not 4 inches taller. Don't give me that. He's still dominant. I hope he continues to tear it up, and shows those people they were wrong.
    If you can't build a winning team with that core a fire-sale isn't the solution. Selling the franchise, moving them to Nashville and converting GABP into a used car lot is.
    -LTlabner

  8. #7
    Stat Wanker Hodiernus RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    15,999

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    Last year they had Tim Lincecum at #26. Lincecum was otherworldly dominant, as opposed to Cueto's merely being really really good, but he's also got two years on him.

    Ahead of him
    #3 Bailey, CIN
    #4 Hughes, NYY
    #10 Gallardo, MIL
    #11 Elbert, LAD
    #12 Pelfrey, NYM
    #14 Adam Miller, CLE
    #19 Andrew Miller, DET
    #20 Adenhart, LAA
    #21 Garza, MIN

    Behind him:
    #30 Hochevar, KC
    #34 Danks, CHW
    #39 Lofgren, CLE
    #42 Kershawm LAD
    #45 Rogers, MIL
    #46 Volstad, FLA
    #47 Slowey, MIN
    #48 Hirsch, HOU (now COL)

    Roughly 1/3 of that full list hit the majors to stay last year, much less so in terms of pitchers however.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    9,850

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    Votto comes in at #34 on this year's rankings. IMO he and Cueto should be very close to each other, about ten spots higher than this.
    Go BLUE!!!

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    536

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    I think Votto at #34 is about right. His defensive rep - deserved or not - probably stops him from getting top 25.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    9,850

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    Bruce #1
    Bailey #9
    Votto #34
    Cueto #47

    I think Bruce and Bailey are exactly where they should be. Votto and Cueto should be in the 20-30 range IMO.
    Go BLUE!!!

  12. #11
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,289

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    That list is an ABSOLUTE JOKE. Seriously. Adam Miller in the top 10? One scout pretends as if he has never even heard of Jay Bruce with the comment in his write up
    When told that Bruce would be topping our Top 50 list, one scout said, "Wow, that's got to be one special bat for a corner outfielder to be No. 1." The implication is that since Bruce won't end up playing a premium position and isn't as pure a five-tool player as some other outfielders on this list, he must be able to flat-out rake if the scouting industry considers him to be the best prospect in all baseball.
    How can I honestly take a list serious when one of the people involved in making it says he must have a special bat if....? It comes off like the guy doesn't even know who he is. I think Bruce is the #1 prospect in baseball and would be very surprised if any list didn't have him at #1, but just wow.
    Adam Miller was #14 last year. This year he pitches 65 innings, allows 68 hits, a .265 BAA and a 4.82 ERA in AAA and moves up 4 spots?!
    Cameron Maybin at #3.... simply wow is all I can say.
    Andrew McCutchen at #8? I like the kid and all, but no way is he this high.

  13. #12
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    6,417

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    That list is an ABSOLUTE JOKE. Seriously. Adam Miller in the top 10? One scout pretends as if he has never even heard of Jay Bruce with the comment in his write up

    How can I honestly take a list serious when one of the people involved in making it says he must have a special bat if....? It comes off like the guy doesn't even know who he is. I think Bruce is the #1 prospect in baseball and would be very surprised if any list didn't have him at #1, but just wow.
    Adam Miller was #14 last year. This year he pitches 65 innings, allows 68 hits, a .265 BAA and a 4.82 ERA in AAA and moves up 4 spots?!
    Cameron Maybin at #3.... simply wow is all I can say.
    Andrew McCutchen at #8? I like the kid and all, but no way is he this high.
    I agree. I understand that we need scouting to compliment statistical analysis, but it seems that this list was put together with TOTAL DISREGARD to statistical analysis...
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  14. #13
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    6,417

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    Quote Originally Posted by GoReds33 View Post
    I can't stand these things. The only reason he isn't higher is because he's not 4 inches taller. Don't give me that. He's still dominant. I hope he continues to tear it up, and shows those people they were wrong.
    Are we talking about Troy Smith?
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  15. #14
    The Future GoReds33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    2,463

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List

    Luke Hochevar... hah. Thank God Cueto's not behind that guy.
    If you can't build a winning team with that core a fire-sale isn't the solution. Selling the franchise, moving them to Nashville and converting GABP into a used car lot is.
    -LTlabner

  16. #15
    Making sense of it all Matt700wlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,508

    Re: Milb.com Top 50 Prospect List



Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25