Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 38

Thread: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,189

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    Quote Originally Posted by hippie07 View Post
    I'd rather trade Hammy to the Pirates for Snell if I were going to undersell him to a Central division team.

    Do you have a link?
    http://chicagosports.chicagotribune....home-headlines

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,344

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    Actually, if you read that article it seems like Sullivan doesn't have his own sources with regard to Hamilton. I hope it is just a false alarm.
    FIRE DUSTY BAKER

    ADOPT THIS SIGNATURE IN SOLIDARITY!!!

  4. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    515

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    Quote Originally Posted by 757690 View Post
    Here is my prediction for what will happen this week in Nashville, Reds wise.

    1) The Reds will sign Brett Tomko to a small two year deal worth $4M or less.
    2) The Reds will trade EE to the Giants for Noah Lowry.
    That is all that will happen in the Nashville.
    Later, in January, when most of the Free Agents are signed, Krivsky will pick up a few starters off the scrap heap for close to the minimum, hoping that one of them comes through in Spring Training.

    The Reds will not trade any of the big four, and will only trade Hamilton if they get a young, solid #2 or better pitcher in return. (although they will probably have to add some level two prospects to get that accomplished.)
    Do you think the Giants would do EE for Lowry at an even swap?

    If so and people think he'd be a solid #3 (I don't know), then I'd do it, because even though I'd hate to give up EdE, he's probably the one of the big 5 that would hurt the least to lose, IMO. We'll miss he RH bat though, we'd need to hope that Cantu can step up and be productive

  5. #19
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    10,567

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    Quote Originally Posted by hippie07 View Post
    Do you think the Giants would do EE for Lowry at an even swap?

    If so and people think he'd be a solid #3 (I don't know), then I'd do it, because even though I'd hate to give up EdE, he's probably the one of the big 5 that would hurt the least to lose, IMO. We'll miss he RH bat though, we'd need to hope that Cantu can step up and be productive
    Not sure the Giants would do an even swap, but I am sure the two teams could work something out. They are desperate for a thirdbaseman.

    EE would be replaced by Keppinger, who is right handed, and had a higher slugging percentage than EE last year. And you are correct, Cantu would be needed to fill that void too. But I think he can, he is a huge improvement over Conine.

  6. #20
    Member Jay Bruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    193

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    For the last two seasons, Lowry has been an awful pitcher. His K/9 was 4.74 in 2006, and improved to a still awful 5.02 in 2007. On the other hand, his BB/9 increased from a mediocre (considering the lack of K's) 3.16 to an horrible 5.02. Basically, he walks too many guys, and doesn't strike out nearly enough. In addition, his GB/FB ratio for his career is only 1.01. His HR/9 for his career is an adequate 0.93, but his HR/FB percentage suggest that this low number is a product of playing at AT&T park. If the Reds give up Encarnacion, or anything of value for Lowry, it will be an abysmal move.

  7. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,344

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    There's a blurb up on MLBTradeRumors that makes me think the Giants may indeed move one of Matt Cain or Tim Lincecum. It says that the Giants spent much of the day watching tape of the two trying to determine which one they like better. Personally, I would prefer Cain because of his durable build, but they're both good pitchers.
    FIRE DUSTY BAKER

    ADOPT THIS SIGNATURE IN SOLIDARITY!!!

  8. #22
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    10,567

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Bruce View Post
    For the last two seasons, Lowry has been an awful pitcher. His K/9 was 4.74 in 2006, and improved to a still awful 5.02 in 2007. On the other hand, his BB/9 increased from a mediocre (considering the lack of K's) 3.16 to an horrible 5.02. Basically, he walks too many guys, and doesn't strike out nearly enough. In addition, his GB/FB ratio for his career is only 1.01. His HR/9 for his career is an adequate 0.93, but his HR/FB percentage suggest that this low number is a product of playing at AT&T park. If the Reds give up Encarnacion, or anything of value for Lowry, it will be an abysmal move.

    I am sorry, but I can't respect the opinion of anyone who says that a guy who was 21-18 with a 4.33 ERA on last place team the last two years was "an awful pitcher".
    Maybe he wasn't as good as those numbers indicate, but he won games, and didn't allow the other team to score lots of runs when he pitched. That is his job, and he was not "awful" if he did his job.

    He walks too many guys, yes, but he doesn't give up many hits. His ERA is way below the league average, and it can't all be the park, because it is the same on the road as it is at home. And it is half a run lower than Zito's who pitched in the same park.

    He also only gave up 33 homers in the last two years (16.5 a year, and only 12 last year). I am sure that he would give up more if he pitched in GABP, but even if it went up by half to 25 a year, he would be better than Harang and Arroyo in that department.

    Only three times last year did he give up more than 4 runs, and two of those times were the last two starts, when he was probably wiped out. He had 16 quality starts in 26 games, almost the same ratio of Harang. Was Harang "awful" last year?

    He probably will have a career similar to Kurt Rueter, or Tom Browning, look at their stats. Were they "awful" pitchers?

    He is a solid back of the rotation pitcher who can give the team lots of innings, and keep his team in the game. He may not be a very good pitcher, but he definitely is not "awful" and is better than what the Reds have now at the end of the rotation, which is nothing.

    I would gladly give up EE for him.

  9. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Amarillo,Texas
    Posts
    4,368

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    I think Krivsky will only move Hamilton if he gets a #2 or better back in trade. I don't think Hamilton will be moved for a #3-#5 starter. He has always been reluctant to trade value players, unless he had a similar player available to take his place in the minors

  10. #24
    Member Jay Bruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    193

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    Quote Originally Posted by 757690 View Post
    I am sorry, but I can't respect the opinion of anyone who says that a guy who was 21-18 with a 4.33 ERA on last place team the last two years was "an awful pitcher".
    Maybe he wasn't as good as those numbers indicate, but he won games, and didn't allow the other team to score lots of runs when he pitched. That is his job, and he was not "awful" if he did his job.

    He walks too many guys, yes, but he doesn't give up many hits. His ERA is way below the league average, and it can't all be the park, because it is the same on the road as it is at home. And it is half a run lower than Zito's who pitched in the same park.

    He also only gave up 33 homers in the last two years (16.5 a year, and only 12 last year). I am sure that he would give up more if he pitched in GABP, but even if it went up by half to 25 a year, he would be better than Harang and Arroyo in that department.

    Only three times last year did he give up more than 4 runs, and two of those times were the last two starts, when he was probably wiped out. He had 16 quality starts in 26 games, almost the same ratio of Harang. Was Harang "awful" last year?

    He probably will have a career similar to Kurt Rueter, or Tom Browning, look at their stats. Were they "awful" pitchers?

    He is a solid back of the rotation pitcher who can give the team lots of innings, and keep his team in the game. He may not be a very good pitcher, but he definitely is not "awful" and is better than what the Reds have now at the end of the rotation, which is nothing.

    I would gladly give up EE for him.
    In the last two years, his xFIP (ERA independent of defense and park factors, assuming average luck), were 5.66 and 5.47. Those are awful xFIP numbers. If Lowry was with the Reds, who have a poor defense, and a small ballpark, his ERA would be much closer to this level, making him a number 5 level starter at best (If I was being generous).

    To give up a promising third baseman like EE for him would be ludicrous.

  11. #25
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    10,567

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Bruce View Post
    In the last two years, his xFIP (ERA independent of defense and park factors, assuming average luck), were 5.66 and 5.47. Those are awful xFIP numbers. If Lowry was with the Reds, who have a poor defense, and a small ballpark, his ERA would be much closer to this level, making him a number 5 level starter at best (If I was being generous).

    To give up a promising third baseman like EE for him would be ludicrous.
    xFIP is a joke. The only way to truely get a real xFIP is to watch every pitch thrown, and judge every at bat against that pitcher. But that is not how it is done. It simply is using the flyball ratio of a pitcher to adjust his ERA. It is still listed as an "experimental" stat, meaning that there is no real evidence to support it.

    To give you an idea of how much it is a joke, at how poor it is at predicting a pitchers potential ERA, look at this from Baseball Times in 2005.

    Here is a list of pitchers most likely to improve according to xFIP.

    Brown K. NYA 24.0 8.25 3.80 4.45
    Wright J. NYA 19.7 9.15 5.10 4.05
    Lilly T. TOR 24.3 7.77 4.29 3.47
    Anderson B. KC 28.7 6.91 4.01 2.90
    Elarton S. CLE 25.0 7.20 4.50 2.70
    Bell R. TB 25.0 8.28 5.63 2.65
    Backe B. HOU 35.7 6.81 4.22 2.60
    Kennedy J. COL 33.3 7.56 5.05 2.51
    Lohse K. MIN 21.7 6.65 4.15 2.49
    Harper T. TB 18.7 6.27 3.82 2.45
    Wood K. CHN 26.3 6.15 3.78 2.38
    Wilson P. CIN 36.0 7.25 5.11 2.14
    Vazquez J. ARI 44.0 4.70 2.71 2.00


    And here is a list of pitchers most likely to decline according to xFIP:

    Blanton J. OAK 30.3 2.67 5.39 -2.72
    Garland J. CHA 39.0 1.38 4.01 -2.63
    Chacon S. COL 22.0 3.27 5.87 -2.60
    Rogers K. TEX 38.3 2.11 4.60 -2.48
    Moehler B. FLA 24.7 2.19 4.40 -2.21
    Hampton M. ATL 43.7 2.47 4.62 -2.15
    Patterson J. WAS 33.7 1.60 3.71 -2.11
    Sabathia C. CLE 24.0 2.63 4.62 -2.00
    Contreras J. CHA 34.7 2.60 4.54 -1.94
    Seo J. NYN 18.0 2.00 3.93 -1.93
    Santos V. MIL 34.3 2.88 4.79 -1.90
    Robertson N. DET 28.0 4.18 6.08 -1.90


    Yep, that xFIP did a great job. Kevin Brown, Kerry Wood, Paul Wilson, Rob Bell, Kyle Lohse, they all were CY Young candidates, right? I'll give you Ted Lilly, so it was right 10% of the time. But other stats showed the same thing.

    And Joe Blanton, CC Sabathia, Jon Garland, and Kenny Rogers have shown how "awful" they really are. It was right about Seo, Santos, Chacon, and Moehler, but again, you didn't need xFIP to tell you that they were going to decline.

    As I said at the top, xFIP is joke. Pretty much worthless.

  12. #26
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    6,429

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    Noah Lowry was not awful despite doing some really bad things. Noah Lowry will be awful going forward.
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  13. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    544

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    You might say xFIP is worthless, but then say Wins matter? You say ERA matters?
    You have to consider the park when determining the quality of pitchers. The Giants have historically had a pitchers park, with low HR numbers. The Reds is a hitters with high HR numbers. Lowery is neutral (1:1) in GB/FB ratio, so his HR/9 will increase. He also has played behind a decent (yet old) SF defense. His ERA is deceiving considering his high WHIP and bad peripherals. HE HAD A 1/1 K/BB RATIO LAST YEAR! He isn't a #3. His FIP has been around 5.00 the past 2 years. Belisle is a better pitcher. Would you give up EE to get another Belisle? Nope

  14. #28
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    10,567

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    Quote Originally Posted by mlbfan30 View Post
    You might say xFIP is worthless, but then say Wins matter? You say ERA matters?
    You have to consider the park when determining the quality of pitchers. The Giants have historically had a pitchers park, with low HR numbers. The Reds is a hitters with high HR numbers. Lowery is neutral (1:1) in GB/FB ratio, so his HR/9 will increase. He also has played behind a decent (yet old) SF defense. His ERA is deceiving considering his high WHIP and bad peripherals. HE HAD A 1/1 K/BB RATIO LAST YEAR! He isn't a #3. His FIP has been around 5.00 the past 2 years. Belisle is a better pitcher. Would you give up EE to get another Belisle? Nope

    In my previous post, I said everything you just said. That his stats will get worse in GABP, but just not as bad as everyone is assuming.

    His ERA is the same on the road as it is at home, in fact, most of his stats are as well. That is by far the most important stat to look at in determining how a pitcher will fair in a new ballpark.

    Also, he only gave up 12 HR's last year. Even if that doubles, that is less than Harang or Aroyyo. And he had the same ratio of quality starts. in fact, he kept he team in the game in nearly every game.

    You guys seem to be obsessed with certain stats, as if they are the only ones you need to look at in determining how good a pitcher is and will be. K/BB is important, but some pitchers are able to succeed with a bad K/BB ratio. Look at Tom Browning and Kurt Reuter. There are many more.

    One stat where he is very different from Belisle, is consistency. Belisle is either great, or awful. Lowry is always just OK. He may not be a #3, but he is a solid #4 or #5, which is what I think EE is worth. I mean if Hamilton or Votto is only worth a #3, then EE is only worth a #4 or 5.

  15. #29
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    6,429

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    Quote Originally Posted by 757690 View Post
    In my previous post, I said everything you just said. That his stats will get worse in GABP, but just not as bad as everyone is assuming.

    His ERA is the same on the road as it is at home, in fact, most of his stats are as well. That is by far the most important stat to look at in determining how a pitcher will fair in a new ballpark.

    Also, he only gave up 12 HR's last year. Even if that doubles, that is less than Harang or Aroyyo. And he had the same ratio of quality starts. in fact, he kept he team in the game in nearly every game.

    You guys seem to be obsessed with certain stats, as if they are the only ones you need to look at in determining how good a pitcher is and will be. K/BB is important, but some pitchers are able to succeed with a bad K/BB ratio. Look at Tom Browning and Kurt Reuter. There are many more.

    One stat where he is very different from Belisle, is consistency. Belisle is either great, or awful. Lowry is always just OK. He may not be a #3, but he is a solid #4 or #5, which is what I think EE is worth. I mean if Hamilton or Votto is only worth a #3, then EE is only worth a #4 or 5.
    So what do you expect from Lowry in a Reds uniform next year?

    By the way- it's Kirk Rueter

    EDIT- Also, his home roads splits might not be huge because the NL West is four pitchers parks and Coors...
    Last edited by *BaseClogger*; 12-04-2007 at 03:44 PM.
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  16. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,189

    Re: Winter Meetings First Day In Review

    Lowry is not good, his K/BB ratio was awful and hes a soft tossing lefty.

    Bad bad idea


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25