First, let me say that I'm against players using artificial substances to enhance their performance. Steroids? No place for them in sports.
I have to admit that I don't know a lot about HGH. Apparently it doesn't build muscle as much as it promotes healing. Can anyone recommend a good source for researching HGH and how it compares to steroids?
With the Mitchell Report buzz, I began to wonder, if HGH truly doesn't build mass, how different is it from something like cortisone shots that help players get onto the field when they wouldn't be able to otherwise?
I'm not suggesting allowing HGH, I simply would like to learn more about it.