Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Snell to the Mariners?-Rumor

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Amarillo,Texas
    Posts
    4,406

    Snell to the Mariners?-Rumor

    Mariners/Pirates deal; No Clement? Aw shucks..

    The Pirates and Mariners have been talking for quite some time it seems as we heard Pittsburgh Pirates GM Neal Huntington passed on a Jones-Morrow-Sherrill deal for Snell in December.

    A few of my scouting buds are questioning whether a Pirates/M's deal can get done on several fronts. For instance:

    -- does Brandon Morrow project long-term as a starter or a closer? Think Daniel Moskos. Some scouts are suggesting he might end up being a better fit closing. He can bring the heat but he had problems repeating his delivery late last year. Perhaps it was fatigue.. perhaps not. Also, he just can't get a feel for most of his secondary pitches yet.. command might be his downfall.

    -- can any MLB team afford to keep Jeff Clement's poor defense behind the dish? Yes, he can rake, but where does his glove play? Some scouts think first base which means the Pirates would end up with a 20/HR .275 MLB average defender on the corner. Do the Pirates already have that potential with Ryan Doumit, Steve Pearce, or even Neil Walker?

    -- you would think Adam Jones has to be in any package Huntington gets from the Mariners. He could be a league average or better shortstop which the Pirates need. With his speed and power potential, Pirate fans could drool thinking about OBP with Jones, McCutchen, and Walker sometime in 2009. But wait, few know this cat can throw 97 mph heaters off the mound too. Is pitching in his career down the road?

    -- Carlos who? Carlos Triunfel. Several scouts have told me Huntington would be nuts to not include this soon to be 18 year old in any deal. The Mariners have already told other teams he's about as untouchable as anyone can be. Why all the rage? He's being compared to A-Rod.

    He hit .304/.320/.413 over 50 at bats in low-A, broke his thumb, rehabbed, then was sent to the California League where he raked .288/.333/.356 in 208 at bats while striking out a measly 15%. That was at 17, mind you.. in High-A. My-oh-my.

    But 38 errors in 95 games at short is a bit of a shock. He needs to be slowed down and not pushed but he certainly has some scouts thinking his upside is off the charts. The problem for the Pirates is, Triunfel is at least 4 years off.. perhaps more. Can they eat the fan PR hit taking such a youngster?

    -- Wladimir Balentien put up some impressive first-half numbers at Tacoma then fell off the map toward the end of the year. He projects out as an average to plus defender on one of the outfield corners and certainly has plus power, but he might have a better chance of lending his name to a company that makes fans than staying on a club's 25-man roster over time. Think about a Brad Eldred whiff-machine with a better glove and better foot speed.

    We know what we have in Ian Snell - he's a fastball/slider guy who is going to miss bats and keep us in the game over 80 pitches, despite having crud defenders behind him.

    We also know Jason Bay will put the ball over the wall 25 times every year no matter if he hits .245 or .295. Bay is a complimentary piece with a poor arm, average to better than average foot speed for his size, and he does an ok job covering the ball in his zone. Out of his zone, forget it.

    Snell is young, healthy, cheap, and a competitor. Bay has been declining the last 1.5 years (insert health excuses here?) but it stands to reason as he approaches his contract year he's going to focus a bit more and put it back together.

    Now dealing Snell is easy to do. He rates two "plus" 0-3 prospects or three above average 0-3 prospects. Bay rates at least one "plus" prospect or two above average prospects if a team takes him at face value, which may not be possible right now.

    If the Mariners went to the checkout line with Bay and Snell in their cart, Huntington would have to ask for three A- to A prospects, but the Mariners only have one - Jones. They will argue Clement or Morrow deserve to be rated A-, but I doubt Coonley would allow Huntington to place them there.

    So if Jones is partial payment, that leaves the Mariners still owing three above average prospects (B to B+), and they have to be players that fit the Pirates needs.

    If the Pirates pro scouts think Morrow can continue to develop and fine tune pitches other a splitter and fastball, plus repeat his delivery and gain better command, he would be one of the three, I'm guessing. He could immediately fill our need for a right-hand reliever in the pen while the Pirates start stretching him out later in the year.

    That leaves two players to pull from their wallet and this is where it starts getting risky.

    Can Russell and the Pirates add mileage to Clement behind the dish? If they work only on his footwork, that might get him a couple more years behind the plate. His bat makes Paulino's look like a joke, but don't forget our pitching is young and we've already seen what a poor receiver does to them in Doumit - they lose, and they lose often. So do we spin Clement off? Use him at 1B? Or not accept him as payment?

    Carlos Triunfel looks like the real deal, smells like the real deal, and walks like the real deal, but is he the real deal? And what's his makeup like because there are some questions floating around about him. And can the Pirates even afford to take on a high-A player even if he is a potential impact guy?

    That's why this deal hasn't gotten done.. there are too many question marks.. too many risks for the Pirates.

    Look for the Mainers to continue their push for Snell but drop out of the Bay race. Jones, Morrow, and Clement or Triunfel, or even (maybe?) Jones, Morrow, and Tony Butler just might get this done from the Pirates perspective. From the Mariners perspective, they won't talk past Jones and Morrow plus some unwanted stuff.

    And that's where we stand today. Like Littlefield last year with Gonzalez, Huntington has to stand his ground on Snell. He has at least three teams in on him so to deal him short to the Mariners just because they are barking loud right now doesn't make sense.

    And Bay? I still think he has Cleveland written all over him, although the Padres might have something to say about that.

    --

    Matt Clement signed with the Cardinals. Yeah, oh boy.. he'll be the 2008 version of 2007's Kip Wells to them. Sink Cards, sink.

    http://buccoblog.mlblogs.com/my_webl...rspirates.html

    I wonder if the Reds are one of the 3 teams. I remembered one of our members was very high on Snell, so I brought this subject up.
    Last edited by AmarilloRed; 01-04-2008 at 01:23 AM.

  2. #2
    Old Red Guard Reject
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,419

    Re: Snell to the Mariners?-Rumor

    Jones/Morrow/Sherrill seems more than fair to me for Snell. Last I checked, mlbtraderumors.com said that the M's were offering a Jones/Clement combo with another prospect to the O's for Bedard, but refused to include Morrow. Snell may be on the brink of a breakout season, but then again may not.

    With the Pirates so down on Bay, I would certainly inquire. He had his worst season last year, but he's 29 and before last season had three straight .900+ OPS years. Plus he's RH. If the price is right....
    If you ain't first, you're last! - Ricky Bobby

  3. #3
    Old Red Guard Reject
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,419

    Re: Snell to the Mariners?-Rumor

    From ESPN last week:

    A five-player trade is being discussed, apparently expanding upon the rumor originally reported by ESPN's Steve Phillips. The Bucs would send Bay and catcher Ronny Paulino for Franklin Gutierrez, Kelly Shoppach, and Cliff Lee.

    They later said this deal fell through (can't imagine why )

    That package is crap. Even Tribe fans will tell you that.
    If you ain't first, you're last! - Ricky Bobby

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    319

    Re: Snell to the Mariners?-Rumor

    Morrow is viewed as a starter only. The M's botched how they used him last year. He has improved very nicely this winter but needs a few more starts under his belt. Morrow has nice updside if developed right which is always a challenge for the M's.

    Jones is an outfielder and should play center someday with his ability. He has not played short in awhile and is not well suited for the position. Jones is a potential stud but if the Pirates consider him a SS they are smoking crack and lots of it.

    Clement has lefty power which is always sexy but I believe he his currently overrated. He has power and his defense is not good but not a total disaster yet. His eyes are good but he still has holes in his swing. I would have liked to see him make more adjustments last year. I'd be cautious those holes might not close then his value will plument. I'd trade him now. His value as a prospect may be greater than his value as an actual player.

  5. #5
    he/him *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    7,803

    Re: Snell to the Mariners?-Rumor

    I was very high on Snell, and hoping the Reds could package Hamilton + Stubbs/Maloney for him. IF it turns out the M's get him for only Adam Jones, I will be a little more dissapointed in the Volquez trade...


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator