Turn Off Ads?

View Poll Results: Do you want the Reds to stand pat on the rotation?

Voters
57. You may not vote on this poll
  • Go into spring training with these starters

    18 31.58%
  • Sign a free agent

    29 50.88%
  • Make a trade

    16 28.07%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Amarillo,Texas
    Posts
    4,371

    Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    John Fay reported today he thinks the Reds will stand pat on their rotation, and go into spring training with the starters they have. My question is what would you like them to do- stay with the starters they have, make a trade,and/ or sign a free agent. I will now open up the poll. I voted to sign a free agent, as I think we could use Livan Hernandez or Bartolo Colon.
    Last edited by AmarilloRed; 01-10-2008 at 07:22 PM.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,189

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    There is no free agents worth signing so yes i want them to stand pat.

    Sounds like the trade market is a sellers market and/or everyone is demanding too much from us.

  4. #3
    Viva La Rose! Mr.MojoRisin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    119

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    Probably should stand pat. My vote's still out untill spring training though.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Radford, Virginia
    Posts
    282

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    I say sign a FA to a reasonable deal and keep the prospects.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    511

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    I voted to make a trade.I would love to see the Reds get a Bedard,Blanton,Lee,or Capuano(SP).Bedard and Blanton may cost to much.But I believe Lee would come in at a reasonable rate and be a good 3rd starter.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    394

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    I don't think Colon or Livan would be great additions to the rotation. However, they would be great role models/mentors to Volquez or Cuerto if one or both would make the big club.

  8. #7
    Joey Votto Fangirl HeatherC1212's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    2,678

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    I'm not all that enthused about the FA pitchers this year and I'm also not on board with any of the wacky trade ideas I've seen around the 'net lately. I'm perfectly fine with standing pat as we head into spring training and seeing how the young guys do there. If something happens to fall our way or we can get a FA like Leiber or Livan for a really good deal, then go for it and let's see what happens. There's plenty of time left before the season starts IMO.
    "I tried to play golf, but I found out I wasn't very good." -Joey Votto on his offseason hobby search

    An MLB.com reporter asked what one thing Votto couldn’t do. “I can’t skate or play hockey,” Votto said. “Well, I can skate ... but I can’t stop.”

  9. #8
    OOOOH YEEEAHHHH!! CarolinaRedleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Greensboro, NC
    Posts
    600

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    This team, as it's constructed now, can compete in (and win with a few breaks) the NLC. I'd take the Pepsi Challenge w/Harang & Arroyo vs any other 1-2 punch in the division, and with a shored up bullpen, the rest of the staff simply has to pitch well enough to give the team's offense a chance. Belisle has more than a full season of experience under his belt and Homer can be outstanding when healthy.

  10. #9
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    6,458

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    I chose all 3 because it depends on the price for the last two. If the price is reasonable, then I say #2 or #3 is ok... otherwise I would stand pat...
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    1,154

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    I voted for making a trade. I still think that Bedard could end up in Cincinnati. I don't want the Reds to be foolish in what they're willing to send to Baltimore...but if they hold firm a little longer, I think all of the bluffing will die down and Bedard will become more reasonable. If not, I agree with some others on a Cliff Lee deal. I'm not nearly as excited about Blanton or Capuano as some of you are. Hernandez seems to be a waste, as does Josh Fogg. I kind of think that Colon is done, too. Harang, Bedard, Arroyo, Belisle and Bailey/Volquez/Maloney...not too bad.
    Last edited by roby; 01-11-2008 at 01:01 AM. Reason: typos again

  12. #11
    Plan to be spontaneous Jefferson24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Illinios
    Posts
    1,200

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    Instead of signing a FA you would be just as well off giving those starts to the kids and let them gain experiance. I think in the end the kids will have more success than a washed-up has-been FA pitcher. When is the last time the Reds went out and spent more than they should have on an older used-to-be-good pitcher and had good results from the acquisition? So why do we think all of a sudden that luck will change? Let the kids pitch and take their bumps. The way I see it the bumps come either way.
    We only live in patches. - H. G. Wells

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    2,161

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    I would do both #2 and #3.

    Sign a FA - aka Livan Hernandez 1 year deal with 2nd year Club Option with $1M buyout.
    This guy will FOR SURE eat up innings, you can write down 200 innings easy. This alone is worth a shot, because odds are between Belisle/Volquez/Bailey/Cueto - they're probably ALL going to see some time regardless in the Majors.
    He also (arguably) has a GOOD probability of doing those 200+ innings at under 5.00 ERA. That's solid #4 and GREAT #5 SP stuff.

    I would STILL try to trade for a Bedard/Blanton type. I would give up ONE of Bailey/Cueto and MAYBE ONE of Votto/EdE, but not two of either in any trade.
    IFF you get one of these guys, you STILL Pencil in Livan Hernandez for 200+ innings, but now at #5 instead of #4, where you put Belisle. NOW, you have options, in that if he falters - or Belisle or any other injuries - you go with Volquez or Bailey/Cueto.
    You are MORE THAN LIKELY going to need to pull one or more of them up from AAA regardless, but in a PERFECT WORLD you start them ALL in AAA and gain confidence, work out final kinks, etc, and you bring up the HOT GUN if/when/as you need to.

    PEACE

    -BLEEDS

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    109

    Re: Should the Reds stand pat on their rotation?

    I'm torn on the topic. Part of me wants Bedard or top-line starter at any cost. Because even with the loss of prospects and potential offense, that rotation is still good enough to get you into the playoffs. However, I keep getting hung up on the Bailey Cueto potential. I'd hate to only get 2 years of Bedard and have B/C turn into great, or even really good pitchers that could be controlled for a long time.
    Brian

    Editor StorageReview.com - SSD & HDD Reviews


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25