Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30

Thread: Blanton & Street: Would you?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    515

    Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Would you do a Bailey/Cueto package for Blanton is Street also came back in the deal?

    I got this idea from the Sundeck and its been kicked around a little in some of the threads, but I find it of more interest now that the Reds' interest in Blanton has been confirmed.

    I think this trade would really solidify our rotation & still questionable BP, so I think it's worth a look, but what would it take to land them??? I'd offer something like this:

    Bailey/Cueto, Stubbs, Valaika, Roenicke, Viola/Lecure.... It'd probably take more... I'd perhaps add Votto (or substitute him for Stubbs) if it came down to it.

    Rotation:
    Harang #1
    Arroyo #2/3
    Blanton #3
    Volquez/Cueto #4
    Belisle/Cueto #4/5

    Bullpen:
    Cordero
    Street
    Weathers
    Burton
    Coutlangus
    Stanton
    Bray

    I think this would solve a world of question marks for the club.
    Your thoughts....

  2. #2
    Something clever pahster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    1,908

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Sure, but it would certainly take more to pry those two away from Beane.

  3. #3
    This one's for you Edd Heath's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Dayton Area
    Posts
    8,471

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Quote Originally Posted by pahster View Post
    Sure, but it would certainly take more to pry those two away from Beane.
    I think taking out the / and replacing with a , would do it, and it would decimate the long-term health of this club.
    Some people play baseball. Baseball plays Jay Bruce.

  4. #4
    Something clever pahster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    1,908

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Quote Originally Posted by Heath View Post
    I think taking out the / and replacing with a , would do it, and it would decimate the long-term health of this club.
    That sounds more realistic. And I agree to a point; such a trade could hurt the club in the long run unless Cast has decided to start spending like the Cubs.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    515

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Well, Beane wants Cueto ... so, I think Cueto+ could land us Blanton. Would Votto+ get us Street?

    The trade proposal I made, (especially if Votto is added) is comparable to what the fish got for D-train and Cabrera
    Last edited by hippie07; 01-14-2008 at 12:44 PM.

  6. #6
    Something clever pahster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    1,908

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Quote Originally Posted by hippie07 View Post
    Well, Beane wants Cueto ... so, I think Cueto+ could land us Blanton. Would Votto+ get us Street?
    It'd probably be an awful lot of "plus."

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    515

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Quote Originally Posted by pahster View Post
    It'd probably be an awful lot of "plus."
    Well, if the trade is Bailey/Cueto, Votto, Roenicke, Stubbs.... and others.

    Then thats 4 of our top 10 prospects... Again, I think that's similar to what the Marlins got for 2 All-Star-ish guys...

  8. #8
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,447

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    No. I like both Bailey and Cueto about as much as I like Blanton this year minus the innings, but I think they would put up similar numbers across the board (Bailey more walks, fewer hits, more strikeouts, but similar ERA and WHIP in the 4.25 and 1.30 range, while Cueto with more strikeouts and similar numbers across the board elsewhere). I just don't trust Blanton to do much more than lots of innings and a 4.30-4.60 ERA in our ballpark with our defense.

  9. #9
    Passion for the game Team Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    8,104

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    I would trade 2 unprovens for 2 provens.

    Also, what would this do to Cordero? I can not imagine either Street or Cordero wanting to be co-closers. I could be wrong.

    Nasty Boys Redeux? Of course you would have to throw in Bray to make the Nasty Boy thing work.... If Stanton were in the mix you could just call it the Pig Pen.

    This is pure fantasy anyway, so I thought I would make it a little more magical.
    It's absolutely pathetic that people can't have an opinion from actually watching games and supplementing that with stats. If you voice an opinion that doesn't fit into a black/white box you will get completely misrepresented and basically called a tobacco chewing traditionalist...
    Cedric 3/24/08

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    515

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Quote Originally Posted by Team Clark View Post
    I would trade 2 unprovens for 2 provens.

    Also, what would this do to Cordero? I can not imagine either Street or Cordero wanting to be co-closers. I could be wrong.

    Nasty Boys Redeux? Of course you would have to throw in Bray to make the Nasty Boy thing work.... If Stanton were in the mix you could just call it the Pig Pen.

    This is pure fantasy anyway, so I thought I would make it a little more magical.
    I guess I didn't realize he was a "closer", I thought he was more of a late innings guy being groomed for closer. Anyway, it'd be a trade, not a FA signing, so his "wants" aren't really that important unless his attitude affects his play on the field and I don't know enough about him to know if that's in his history or not.

  11. #11
    Passion for the game Team Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    8,104

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Quote Originally Posted by hippie07 View Post
    I guess I didn't realize he was a "closer", I thought he was more of a late innings guy being groomed for closer. Anyway, it'd be a trade, not a FA signing, so his "wants" aren't really that important unless his attitude affects his play on the field and I don't know enough about him to know if that's in his history or not.
    Nor do I. Street is relatively young and may be easier to handle. Cordero may not see it that way. Pure specualtion on my part.

    I think all players should play for the good of the team. That too is fantasy in this day and age. The last semi-egoless team in Cincinnati was the World Champion '90 Reds. I can't see that happening again any time soon.
    It's absolutely pathetic that people can't have an opinion from actually watching games and supplementing that with stats. If you voice an opinion that doesn't fit into a black/white box you will get completely misrepresented and basically called a tobacco chewing traditionalist...
    Cedric 3/24/08

  12. #12
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Ok, so let me pretend for a minute that Billy Beane would accept Cueto, Votto, Bailey, and then probably a collection of guys like Stubbs, Wood and I'm sure we'd have to throw something else their way since it's Billy Beane we're dealing with, afterall.

    The Reds would get Joe Blanton and Houston Street.

    Combined with other off-season moves, the Reds go from having no closer to having 2 closers, and the rotation goes from Harang/Arroyo/Belisle/?/? to Harang/Arroyo/Blanton/Volquez/? . From a pitching standpoint, it's an absolutely tremendous upgrade. From an offensive standpoint, losing Votto will hurt us, as Hatteberg then goes from maybe platoon back to stop-gap, with nothing remotely ready behind him. My only hope is that one of Dunn or Griffey would be the heir apparent @ 1B for 2009, and maybe even transitioning to the position in 2008. I think it's safe to say that Bruce will be 100% ready by 2009, and hopefully he'll see between 90-100 games in 2008. Trading Votto in a package that would net Blanton and Street would immediately force us to upgrade Norris Hopper and Ryan Freel, as neither of them are long-term positive solutions in the OF, and neither of them are honestly good short-term positive solutions in the OF either. Given Jocketty's propensity to value MLB ready talent rather than MiLB question marks, I think we have enough assets to gain both Blanton and Street, as well as upgrade Hopper and Freel. If those moves are made, then our only lingering question mark is C.

    Now, to see what kind of power Jocketty has with us, b/c so far to his credit, Krivsky's held the kids close to his chest in an attempt to nurse them. Breast-feeding's over, this team can win if we, to quote Nirvana, "sell the kids for food".

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    10,675

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Quote Originally Posted by Highlifeman21 View Post
    Ok, so let me pretend for a minute that Billy Beane would accept Cueto, Votto, Bailey, and then probably a collection of guys like Stubbs, Wood and I'm sure we'd have to throw something else their way since it's Billy Beane we're dealing with, afterall.

    The Reds would get Joe Blanton and Houston Street.
    Blanton isn't very good. Everyone seems to be missing this point.

    Why do we want to throw them Cueto, Bailey, Vottos and others for Blanton?

    Street is good, but an unnecessary luxary for us. Blanton is hardly worth one of those 3 prospects.

  14. #14
    Matt's Dad RANDY IN INDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Brownsburg, Indiana
    Posts
    15,268

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Blanton isn't very good. Everyone seems to be missing this point.

    Why do we want to throw them Cueto, Bailey, Vottos and others for Blanton?

    Street is good, but an unnecessary luxary for us. Blanton is hardly worth one of those 3 prospects.
    Talent is God Given: be humble.
    Fame is man given: be thankful.
    Conceit is self given: be careful.

    John Wooden

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    515

    Re: Blanton & Street: Would you?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Blanton isn't very good. Everyone seems to be missing this point.

    Why do we want to throw them Cueto, Bailey, Vottos and others for Blanton?

    Street is good, but an unnecessary luxary for us. Blanton is hardly worth one of those 3 prospects.
    I agree that someone like Cueto or Bailey has more upside than Blanton... but I think that at the very least Blanton provides us a cheap consistent innings-eater work horse.... he probably, will put up numbers similar to Arroyo.. however, and I'd take another Arroyo in the rotation if I could get him... plus, he's a Ky boy and may take a hometown discount if he pitches well and we want to extend him to a LTC.

    While Street isnt as much a need as some other areas.. I wouldn't say he's a luxury... we have no idea if Weathers can hold up another year (he's old remember) ... I think Burton has a bright future but he's young and unproven, I wouldn't hang my bullpen on him... which leaves us w/ Cordero... he's the only one I EXPECT to do well, but I remember alotta moaning when we signed him about declining #'s ... it'd be nice to have "another closer."


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25