Turn Off Ads?
Page 17 of 17 FirstFirst ... 71314151617
Results 241 to 245 of 245

Thread: Movies you always wanted to see that dissapoint

  1. #241
    The Future GoReds33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Cincinnati, Ohio

    Re: Movies you always wanted to see that dissapoint

    I thought Airplane 2 was going to be good, but it really dissapointed. It had a lot of the same jokes as the first one.
    If you can't build a winning team with that core a fire-sale isn't the solution. Selling the franchise, moving them to Nashville and converting GABP into a used car lot is.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #242
    Member GAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Bellefontaine, Ohio

    Re: Movies you always wanted to see that dissapoint

    OK. I rented and watched No Country For Old Men this past weekend. As much as I enjoy the Coen brother's movies, I personally don't feel this was one of their best.

    Was it a good movie? Yeah. But I personally don't think it was Oscar winning material.

    And I didn't care for the ending one bit.
    "In my day you had musicians who experimented with drugs. Now it's druggies experimenting with music" - Alfred G Clark (circa 1972)

  4. #243
    Member Elam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004

    Re: Movies you always wanted to see that dissapoint

    Across the Universe, it was hyped up too much by my friends and just fell short, and this is coming from a huge Beatles enthusiast.

  5. #244
    Member Redhook's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006

    Re: Movies you always wanted to see that dissapoint

    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    First time I saw it, while I thought it was ok, I didn't understand what the fuss was about.

    Second time I saw it, I thought "hey, this isn't that bad"

    Third time, and it's the greatest thing ever.

    I LOVE ND now, and have seen it a bunch. I couldn't tell you WHY I love it, but I do.
    I feel the same way about NP.

    And Pulp Fiction. I didn't PF at all the first time I watched. Maybe because I had to watch it for a college English class. Anyhow, after two more viewings, I realized how awesome it really is. Very clever and very funny.

    A movie I just saw that really disappointed me: There Will Be Blood. I absolutely hated it. It was very long and boring and almost pointless. What a waste of time and money. The acting was good, but that didn't help the fact that there was no plot. Awful movie.

    I did, however, love No Country For Old Men. I didn't care for the ending much, but I was captivated for the entire film. I look forward to watching it again soon.
    "....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421

  6. #245
    Join Date
    May 2000

    Re: Movies you always wanted to see that dissapoint

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    That style of cinema was not a prevalent one for very long, the realism of the 67 - 82 era was a reflection of the current culture and reaction to the prior one. One rooted in realism for the sake of realism. I love that style, was weaned on it and appreciate it.

    But the ET's of the world demanded that style be pushed back into the art houses. Mostly because it bored the regular theater goer more and more as the 70's moved on, it became almost a deluge of movies that made you think... and feel (crappy most of the time) So let's thank The Unmarried Woman, Foxes, Lifeguard and American Gigilo for making us all feel seedy whilst eating popcorn.
    Don't get me wrong, there were many great movies in the 70's, and I liked the griminess and ennui, but some of that "realism" was just lazy and self-indulgent.
    The widow is gathering nettles for her children's dinner; a perfumed seigneur, delicately lounging in the Oeil de Boeuf, hath an alchemy whereby he will extract the third nettle and call it rent. ~ Carlyle

Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | cumberlandreds | Gallen5862 | JaxRed | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | RedsfaninMT | The Operator