Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

  1. #1
    Be the ball Roy Tucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Mason, OH
    Posts
    12,275

    Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    Thought this was of interest...

    http://www.ajc.com/gatech/content/sp...urst_0213.html

    NCAA extends play clock
    Pace of play addressed again by rules committee

    By TONY BARNHART
    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
    Published on: 02/13/08

    Two years ago the NCAA Football Rules committee, concerned that games were running too long, put in a series of changes in hopes of speeding things up.

    They worked. In 2006 the average game time dropped from 3:21 to 3:07 but fans and coaches howled because there were about 13 fewer plays and five fewer points per game than in 2005.

    So last season college football went back to the old rules and the bad news is that games averaged 3:22, a minute longer than in 2005. The good news is that plays and scoring also went back to the desired 2005 levels.

    In an attempt to produce more plays and points in a shorter game, the rules committee went back to the drawing board and on Wednesday recommended a few changes for the upcoming season.

    "Hopefully this time we got it right," said Michael Clark, the chairman of the rules committee and head coach at Bridgewater (Va.) College.

    The first is the implementation of a 40/25-second play clock, similar to that of the NFL. At the end of every play, the 40-second clock will start, which is the rule in the NFL. The old college rules featured a 25-second clock that did not start until the officials marked the ball ready for play. On a change of possession, the first play will be run on a 25-second clock.

    A number of college coaches have said they wanted the 40-second play clock because officials from league to league used different amounts of time to mark the ball ready for play.

    "We think this will give us some consistency when it comes to pace of play," said Connecticut coach Randy Edsall, who is a member of the rules committee.

    "If the NFL boys are doing it we seem to want to do it, too," South Carolina coach Steve Spurrier said. "I think it favors the teams that run the no-huddle. That gives the quarterback a bunch more time to stand up there and read the defense."

    The rules committee made another recommendation that will certainly shorten the game.

    After a player runs out of bounds and the ball is made ready to play, the official will start the game clock. Under the old rules the game clock would not start until the ball was snapped. This new rule will not apply in the final two minutes of the first half and the final two minutes of the game.

    In other recommended rules changes announced Tuesday:

    A coach will get an extra instant replay challenge if his first one is upheld. Under the old rule the coach had only one challenge whether he was right or wrong. Under the new rule the coach, if he's right, will get one extra challenge, but no more.

    If a kickoff goes out of bounds, the receiving team will have the option of taking the ball on its own 40-yard line. The previous rule gave the receiving team the ball on the 35-yard line.

    The incidental five-yard facemask penalty will be eliminated. Only the 15-yard facemask penalties will be called.

    A "horse collar" tackle, where the defender grabs inside the back collar of the shoulder pads to pull the runner down, will now be a personal foul.

    There will no longer be sideline warnings for players and coaches who crowd onto the field during the game. The official may assess a five-yard penalty without a warning for the infraction.

    The recommendations must still be reviewed and given final approval by the NCAA's Playing Rules Oversight Panel, which meets in April.

    Pay attention to the open sky

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    6,450

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    I hate outlawing the horse collar tackle. Is this a contact sport? I know its dangerous, but so is getting tackled by 300 pound lineman-football is inherently dangerous...
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  4. #3
    Waitin til next year bucksfan2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    10,233

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by *BaseClogger* View Post
    I hate outlawing the horse collar tackle. Is this a contact sport? I know its dangerous, but so is getting tackled by 300 pound lineman-football is inherently dangerous...
    To play devils advocate should every tackle be legal such as the face mask tackle?

  5. #4
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    6,450

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
    To play devils advocate should every tackle be legal such as the face mask tackle?
    :stumped:
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  6. #5
    Yay!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Middletown, Ohio
    Posts
    7,449

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
    To play devils advocate should every tackle be legal such as the face mask tackle?
    I'm wondering about the facemask call as well. Will "incidental grasping" of the facemask no longer be a penalty or will it be the 15 yarder now as well. Either way, I don't think I like the change.

    The rest... ehh... I think the 40 second clock will shorten games, but make them lower scoring as well.
    When all is said and done more is said than done.

  7. #6
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    13,453

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    A coach will get an extra instant replay challenge if his first one is upheld. Under the old rule the coach had only one challenge whether he was right or wrong. Under the new rule the coach, if he's right, will get one extra challenge, but no more.
    I like this idea. Hopefully it will be a rare thing that two challenges are upheld in the same half.
    /r/reds

  8. #7
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    6,450

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    If a kickoff goes out of bounds, the receiving team will have the option of taking the ball on its own 40-yard line. The previous rule gave the receiving team the ball on the 35-yard line.
    this is a good idea too in the continuing fight to discourage teams from kicking away from return men
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  9. #8
    Member durl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Nashvull
    Posts
    1,750

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    I don't like the face-mask change. I believe incidental 5-yard penalties should be an option.

  10. #9
    Waitin til next year bucksfan2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    10,233

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Unassisted View Post
    I like this idea. Hopefully it will be a rare thing that two challenges are upheld in the same half.
    I really like the college instant replay system. I like it because all the calls come from the booth and the ultimate decision comes from someone who is not officiating the game. I always wonder if it ever sneaks into the back of an NFL official's head about protecting the call his fellow official made. I doubt its blatant but I would think that it has a little inkling when a call is not reversed.

  11. #10
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    13,453

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by durl View Post
    I don't like the face-mask change. I believe incidental 5-yard penalties should be an option.
    My reading of the change is that incidental face-mask contact will no longer be a penalty, which makes sense. If it actually means that any face-mask contact = automatic 15-yarder, than I'm right with you.
    /r/reds

  12. #11
    Member ochre's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,266

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
    To play devils advocate should every tackle be legal such as the face mask tackle?
    To play devils devils advocate, did they wear shirts in the nascent days of football?

    Unless the wear of shirts is an "add-on" like facemasks (and to some degree helmets even), I see no reason to change the rules regarding collar tackles now.

    Why stop there? Tackling at the knees tends to lead to more knee injuries. Tackling high tends to lead to more head, neck, and spine injuries. Let's just require the tackler to run alongside the ball carrier and grab them gently at the waist while applying negative acceleration until they both near zero velocity. At that point the tackler could ask, kindly of course, for the ball carrier to take a knee. Should he refuse, the tackler must then drag him to the nearest sidelines and force him out of bounds, lest anyone risk the injury of colliding with the ground. I bet it would speed up the game too.
    4009



  13. #12
    Member ochre's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,266

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Unassisted View Post
    My reading of the change is that incidental face-mask contact will no longer be a penalty, which makes sense. If it actually means that any face-mask contact = automatic 15-yarder, than I'm right with you.
    great. More subjectivity. Like the refs were particularly proficient with fewer decisions to make.

    The good thing about having the five yarder there, was even if you (as a fan) don't think it was a minor infraction, at least the team using the facemask didn't get full benefit from it. Now it's going to be up to the refs. I'm guessing there will be games when similar "infractions" are not called equally between the respective participants.
    4009



  14. #13
    Miami Redhawks Redhook's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,257

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    Why does the clock stop on first downs to move the chains? It's ridiculous. That should be eliminated.
    "....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421

    www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips.

  15. #14
    Pagan/Asatru Ravenlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Williamsburg, OH and the wilds.
    Posts
    8,994

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Redhook View Post
    Why does the clock stop on first downs to move the chains? It's ridiculous. That should be eliminated.
    i actually like that rule and would like it in the NFL too.
    the store for all your blade, costuming (in any regard), leather (also in any regard), and steel craft needs.www.facebook.com/tdhshop


    yes, this really is how we make our living.

  16. #15
    Member ochre's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,266

    Re: Proposed NCAA football rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenlord View Post
    i actually like that rule and would like it in the NFL too.
    Same here. Particularly in the last 5 minutes or so of each half.
    4009




Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25