Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Bengals franchise Andrews

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,189

    Bengals franchise Andrews

    The Bengals today designated OL Stacy Andrews as the team’s franchise player, under terms of the NFL’s Collective Bargaining Agreement.
    The franchise tag gives Andrews the option to play for Cincinnati in 2008 for a salary equal to the average of the top five offensive linemen in the NFL for the previous season (2007 in this case).
    Andrews will be a fifth-year NFL player in 2008. He is presently unsigned for ’08, and he will become an unrestricted free agent on Feb. 29 if he does not reach a contract agreement with the Bengals prior to that date. The franchise-player designation means that the Bengals could retain Andrews by matching any offer sheet he would sign from another team, and that if the Bengals declined to match a signed offer, the team signing Andrews would be required to give the Bengals its first-round choices in the 2008 and 2009 NFL Drafts.
    “Stacy has been a productive young player for us,” said Bengals head coach Marvin Lewis. “He has shown the flexibility to start and play well at a number of different positions on our line. This move helps us keep our core players together, and it gives us an opportunity to continue negotiating for a longer-term contract with Stacy.”
    Andrews played in every Bengals game last season, with 14 starts. He started Games 1-3 at LG, but later replaced injured Willie Anderson at ROT, starting at ROT in Games 5 and 7-16. He was a key contributor to the team’s record-low total of 17 sacks allowed. The Bengals ranked second in the NFL in fewest sacks allowed, one off the pace of league leader New Orleans.
    “The franchise option is designed to help a team retain the rights to a top player,” said Bengals vice-president Troy Blackburn. “The players’ union supports it because it guarantees that player a salary commensurate with what he has accomplished.”
    The Collective Bargaining Agreement permits a new agreement between Andrews and the Bengals to be reached at any time prior to July 15.
    Thank god it wasnt smith

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Vampire Weekend @Bernie's camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    11,491

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    Well, they needed to keep him somehow. You have to figure there's no way that both Willie Anderson and Levi Jones will be healthy all year. I wouldn't be surprised if he were signed to a multi-year contract and then Anderson were cut in 2009.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,189

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    Yea its pretty obvious Anderson isnt able to be a full time player all that much anymore

  5. #4
    Member Oxilon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,133

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    Alright, well than. Anderson's been a great team player here and he's had some great seasons, but it's time to move on. If this move doesn't signal Willie's end here, Marvin is dumber than I originally thought. You don't franchise a tackle unless he's starting, so I guess this is it. Atleast this means Smith is gone though, which for a while, I thought was never going to happen.
    That hit was plenty fair. Atleast by a quarter of an inch.
    -Steve Stone

  6. #5
    Kmac5 KoryMac5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Waterloo, NY
    Posts
    3,686

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    Quote Originally Posted by Oxilon View Post
    Alright, well than. Anderson's been a great team player here and he's had some great seasons, but it's time to move on. If this move doesn't signal Willie's end here, Marvin is dumber than I originally thought. You don't franchise a tackle unless he's starting, so I guess this is it. Atleast this means Smith is gone though, which for a while, I thought was never going to happen.
    I think this move gives the Bengals some flexibilty if Jones or Anderson goes down with an injury. Big Willie is one of the best when healthy, I am not willing to write him off just yet. I too am glad Smith didn't get franchised however I wouldn't be surprised if he went on to play well with his next team. It would be just our luck.
    If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,189

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    Smith will be just good enough to annoy everyone no matter where he goes

  8. #7
    Member Oxilon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    2,133

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    Quote Originally Posted by KoryMac5 View Post
    I think this move gives the Bengals some flexibilty if Jones or Anderson goes down with an injury. Big Willie is one of the best when healthy, I am not willing to write him off just yet. I too am glad Smith didn't get franchised however I wouldn't be surprised if he went on to play well with his next team. It would be just our luck.
    Yes, I agree that when healthy, Willie's the better option. However, 1) Willie's never healthy anymore, 2) Willie's old 3) the Bengals drafting Andrews for this very reason -- to be the replacement for Willie in a few years 4) and I really don't like the idea of having your backup OT making $6MM.

    The Bengals drafted Andrews four years ago for this reason -- so he could replace Anderson. Willie's been a solid teammate since being drafted here and had some helluva seasons. But football is a business and you need to know when to let go. Cut Willie, start Andrews and use that money to sign an impact FA. Ofcourse, knowing the Bengals, they'd probably use that money to resign Justin Smith.
    That hit was plenty fair. Atleast by a quarter of an inch.
    -Steve Stone

  9. #8
    Hot Stove Season HotCorner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    The 513
    Posts
    2,181

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    Just because they tagged him doesn't mean they can't sign long term and rescind the franchise tag. From all the comments I've read and heard, everyone just assumes he will play under the tag price. I really believe the Bengals will sign him to a long term deal at a lower salary but a generous signing bonus.

  10. #9
    Boom Goes the Dynamite Screwball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    West Chester
    Posts
    2,416

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    Quote Originally Posted by HotCorner View Post
    Just because they tagged him doesn't mean they can't sign long term and rescind the franchise tag. From all the comments I've read and heard, everyone just assumes he will play under the tag price. I really believe the Bengals will sign him to a long term deal at a lower salary but a generous signing bonus.
    Well, in fairness, that's what everybody (i.e., me and my friends) thought would happen last year with Justin Smith. As we all know it didn't work out that way and the Bengals ended up taking a huge cap hit. That could very well happen here too.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,189

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    I dont think the Bengals really ever tried to sign Smith though.

  12. #11
    The Future GoReds33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    2,463

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    Quote Originally Posted by HotCorner View Post
    Just because they tagged him doesn't mean they can't sign long term and rescind the franchise tag. From all the comments I've read and heard, everyone just assumes he will play under the tag price. I really believe the Bengals will sign him to a long term deal at a lower salary but a generous signing bonus.
    I really hope you're right. IMO, he's not worth the money he's getting with the tag. Granted, I would rather see it on him than Smith, but that's not saying much. I think he should get 3-4 years, so he can take over for Willie in the next couple of years at right tackle.
    If you can't build a winning team with that core a fire-sale isn't the solution. Selling the franchise, moving them to Nashville and converting GABP into a used car lot is.
    -LTlabner

  13. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,071

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    This also dispells any rumors of the Bengals taking an o-lineman in the first round of the draft, which is a very good thing. They absolutely must draft a defensive player with that pick, and it's looking more and more like they may need to trade up to get one of the fab four (Long, Dorsey, Ellis, Gholston). I fear that Marvin doesn't have the mental competence to do this however, and we may suffer through yet another year of getting our guy stolen right before our eyes, while the Bengals FO watches helplessly from the sidelines.
    Go BLUE!!!

  14. #13
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,242

    Re: Bengals franchise Andrews

    Quote Originally Posted by Benihana View Post
    This also dispells any rumors of the Bengals taking an o-lineman in the first round of the draft, which is a very good thing. They absolutely must draft a defensive player with that pick, and it's looking more and more like they may need to trade up to get one of the fab four (Long, Dorsey, Ellis, Gholston). I fear that Marvin doesn't have the mental competence to do this however, and we may suffer through yet another year of getting our guy stolen right before our eyes, while the Bengals FO watches helplessly from the sidelines.
    Shudder, thinks about it again, Shudders again.
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25