Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 43

Thread: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    448

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Valenzuela gets moved for the second time today....


    ATLANTA BRAVES—Traded RHP Sergio Valenzuela to Monclova (Mexican) for future considerations.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,224

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    My guess is that initially Guevara starts the season on the DL, buying the Padres some time.
    If the Pads are going to contend, he's going to have to perform -- or, dagnabit, keep tweaking that hamstring.

  4. #18
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,445

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Big surprise. I know Rule V picks are a shot in the dark, but I don't think I've ever seen one darker.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  5. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    princeton, nj
    Posts
    9,481

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Quote Originally Posted by Mainspark View Post
    Valenzuela gets moved for the second time today....


    ATLANTA BRAVES—Traded RHP Sergio Valenzuela to Monclova (Mexican) for future considerations.

    future considerations were worth more than $25K?

    or just wanted to stick it to the Reds?

    regardless, I'm guessing that the Reds were the day's big winners.

  6. #20
    he/him *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    7,802

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Quote Originally Posted by flyer85 View Post
    funny that a team that generally has had one of the better pens in baseball can try and find room for a draftee from the Reds who over the last few years have had one of the worst pens in baseball.
    IMO the Padres are the epitome of how to build a bullpen. The Reds... not so much...

  7. #21
    Making sense of it all Matt700wlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,537

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Hamilton he wasn't.

  8. #22
    Member cincrazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    South Vienna, OH
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Quote Originally Posted by *BaseClogger* View Post
    IMO the Padres are the epitome of how to build a bullpen. The Reds... not so much...
    Well, judging by very recent history. But for a number of years, the Reds had one of the better bullpens in the NL, so they haven't been inept for all that long at the business.

  9. #23
    Redsmetz redsmetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Winton Place
    Posts
    12,908

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Quote Originally Posted by princeton View Post
    future considerations were worth more than $25K?

    or just wanted to stick it to the Reds?

    regardless, I'm guessing that the Reds were the day's big winners.
    We couldn't have made the trade to a non-ML club without first offering him back to the Braves, and if they didn't want him, he'd have to have cleared waivers before we could have done anything like this.
    “In the same way that a baseball season never really begins, it never really ends either.” - Lonnie Wheeler, "Bleachers, A Summer in Wrigley Field"

    The Baseball Emporium - Books & Things.

    The Baseball Bookstore

    http://tsc-sales.com/
    http://tscsales.blogspot.com/
    http://silverscreenbooks.com/

  10. #24
    he/him *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    7,802

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Quote Originally Posted by cincrazy View Post
    Well, judging by very recent history. But for a number of years, the Reds had one of the better bullpens in the NL, so they haven't been inept for all that long at the business.
    They may have had some good bullpens, but their recent attempts at building 'pens through free agency is not the way to do it IMO...

  11. #25
    Member cincrazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    South Vienna, OH
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Quote Originally Posted by *BaseClogger* View Post
    They may have had some good bullpens, but their recent attempts at building 'pens through free agency is not the way to do it IMO...
    Completely agree with that. They need to get back to developing the likes of Sullivan, Williamson, and Graves (although Graves came up with the Tribe organization, he flourished under us early on).

  12. #26
    15 game winner Danny Serafini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Auburn Jail
    Posts
    4,649

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Not keeping Guevara is irrelevant to picking Valenzuela. One move did not preclude the other. That said, picking Valenzuela was a waste of money the second that pick was made.

  13. #27
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Athens, OH
    Posts
    13,572

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Quote Originally Posted by Danny Serafini View Post
    Not keeping Guevara is irrelevant to picking Valenzuela. One move did not preclude the other.
    That's what I was thinking. The opportunity cost of protecting Guevara in the Rule 5 Draft might have been the loss of a more desirable player.
    /r/reds

  14. #28
    Member Sea Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    26,394

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Quote Originally Posted by redsmetz View Post
    My guess is that initially Guevara starts the season on the DL, buying the Padres some time.

    Don't forget that there's now a "Bowden" rule that keeps teams from stashing Rule 5 guys on the DL:

    To prevent the abuse of the Rule 5 draft, the rule also states that the draftee must be active for at least 90 days. This keeps teams from drafting players, then placing them on the disabled list for the majority of the season. For example, if a Rule 5 draftee was only active for 67 days in his first season with his new club, he must be active for an additional 23 games in his second season to satisfy the Rule 5 requirements.

    Any player chosen in the Rule 5 draft may be traded to any team while under the Rule 5 restrictions, but the restrictions transfer to the new team. If the new team does not want to keep the player on its 25-man roster for the season, he must be offered back to the team of which he was a member when chosen in the draft.

    Yeah, the Pads can start him off on the DL but they can't stash him there all year. It's still entirely possible we'll get this guy back and it won't even cost us a spot on the 40 man

  15. #29
    Beware of Fake Posts Screwball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Louisville
    Posts
    2,428

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    For example, if a Rule 5 draftee was only active for 67 days in his first season with his new club, he must be active for an additional 23 games in his second season to satisfy the Rule 5 requirements.
    So, essentially, a player has two full seasons to play 90 games on the MLB club?

  16. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    princeton, nj
    Posts
    9,481

    Re: Rule 5 draftee returned to Braves

    Quote Originally Posted by redsmetz View Post
    We couldn't have made the trade to a non-ML club without first offering him back to the Braves, and if they didn't want him, he'd have to have cleared waivers before we could have done anything like this.

    dude-- the Braves paid $25K for him, then sent him to Monclova
    .


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator