Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

  1. #1
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    34,336

    Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    42,209

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    Mel Gibson, Hollywood's answer to the Cardiff Giant

  4. #3
    Baseball card addict MrCinatit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Piqua
    Posts
    4,429

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    I have it on good faith that Johnny Gray never took The General through the Battle of Bull Run; Betsy and Arlene had nothing to do with the downfall of Nixon; General Ripper never did send his planes past failsafe; funny things never happened on the way to the forum; and I've got a feeling Hamlet never had an accent which was part U.S., part Australian.

  5. #4
    Senor Votto Degenerate39's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,914

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    I don't think 300 was made to be a historicaly accurate movie. It's funny that the majority of the movies on there are Mel Gibson movies.
    Most Vottomatic Player

  6. #5
    Resident optimist OldRightHander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    east of WOY
    Posts
    5,043

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    As far as Patriot and Braveheart, two favorites of mine, I have always been aware of the inaccuracies but just chose to overlook them because the films still seemed to capture something of the "essence" of what they were talking about. Yeah, the battle of Stirling was a bit inaccurate since the Scots actually butchered the English as they were coming off a bridge and not properly deployed for battle and a few characters were not the proper age. Also I have a hard time believing that Wallace was able to yell "freedom" the way he did after being disemboweled, but I'm not going to nitpick here. Also, Bannockburn was ten years after Wallace's death, but you see some of the soldiers appear not to have aged a bit. Anyway, even with all of those problems, I think the film did what it was intended to do. It entertained me, immersed me in the period it was portraying, and piqued my interest in the subject matter enough to make me want to study further. Patriot did the same thing. I knew there were some liberties, but it does stir up patriotic feelings in me and it makes me appreciative of those who did what they did so we could have freedom. Film is an art form and that's how I view it. If I'm watching a documentary and see those kind of mistakes, then I have a problem.

  7. #6
    Member durl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Nashvull
    Posts
    1,749

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    Quote Originally Posted by OldRightHander View Post
    Film is an art form and that's how I view it. If I'm watching a documentary and see those kind of mistakes, then I have a problem.
    +1

  8. #7
    THAT'S A FACT JACK!! GAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Bellefontaine, Ohio
    Posts
    26,654

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    Are the film makers claiming absolute historical accuracy? I don't think they believe their viewing public is that naive and wouldn't realize that for the sake of the story and entertainment, they dress things up and take various liberties.

    I liked 300; but it wasn't hard to see the many historical inaccuracies. Some were downright hilarious.

    Tombstone is one of my all-time favorite westerns. But upon further investigation there were huge inaccuracies and exaggerations. But still a great movie.

    You mean Costner's The Untouchables isn't a historical accurate portrayal?

    I can't believe none of the Oliver Stone movies didn't make the list. And his subjects were about people and situations that have happened in the last 40-50 years, yet he still couldn't get it right.

    We love our movie heroes and a good story. And that takes some imagination and exaggeration on the film makers part.
    Last edited by GAC; 03-22-2008 at 12:29 AM.
    "panic" only comes from having real expectations

  9. #8
    Member redsrule2500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    3,200

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    I'd like to disagree with that list. I find they seem to be taking more political stances with this list, rather than "historical" viewpoints. OldRightHander has it right IMO.

    300 is obviously correct, but I don't think that was even trying to be historically accurate.... kinda stupid lol
    redsrule2500
    Go Reds!
    Baseball Bliss
    Im a normal guy blessed with the ability to hit a baseball. - Sean Casey

  10. #9
    THAT'S A FACT JACK!! GAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Bellefontaine, Ohio
    Posts
    26,654

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    Is there a list for those movies that go to great detail to provide historical accuracy without taking any liberties and "artistic freedom"?

    The fact is Hollywood has always taken those liberties, mixing fact with fiction (legend) with the sole objective of making a good movie that draws an audience, captivates them, and of course - sells (profits). Being totally historically accurate then takes a back seat.

    We just had a discussion comparing which movie we liked better - Tombstone or Costner's Wyatt Earp. Tombstone won hands down, and was a far better movie, but why? While both took various liberties with the situations surrounding the real life characters, Costner, whose habit is to always over-produce and go over the top, took greater pains to provide more historical accuracy. And he ended up with one long, drawn out, and at times, boring movie.

    I liked the recently released "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford". I liked the movie but it dragged because as I researched it's historical accuracy, which I think they made great attempts to preserve, it suffered and dragged like Costner's Earp did.

    Look at PT 109 with Cliff Robertson, that came out during JFK's Presidency. John Wayne's Chisum, which was about the Lincoln County War.

    This is what Hollywood does.

    So women back in 10,000 B.C. didn't look like Raquel Welch????
    Last edited by GAC; 03-22-2008 at 06:54 AM.
    "panic" only comes from having real expectations

  11. #10
    Pre-tty, pre-tty good!! MWM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    12,324

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    I watched the Patriot and enjoyed some of the elements of it, but overall I found it to be way too "America is great, Britian is evil". I thought the characters as a whole weren't an accurate reflection of the people I've read a lot about over the years (and I've done a lot of Revolutionary study). The fact that they had to turn the "hero" of the movie into a perfect person (freed his slaves, etc...) was just Hollywood tripe. But that's Hollywood small mindedness at its finest. Afterall, you can't have the guy who you're supposed to stand up and cheer for in the end being a slave owner. That just wouldn't fly with Americans. BS!!!!!

    But I'm fairly certain the final battle in the movie is supposed to be the Battle of Cowpens, which was won by the Americans and was seen as a real turning point in the southern part of the war.
    Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David

  12. #11
    The rest is drama. marcshoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    In the woods, with a shovel
    Posts
    5,097

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    This is what Hollywood does.
    Which is why Hollywood doesn't make many movies for me. I liked Wyatt Earp better than Tombstone, which I thought was good, but too silly and overdone to be taken all that seriously. I don't mind a little exposition, even if it makes the movie drag. I'd rather see real grit (not to be confused with "True Grit") than to feel as if I'm being pandered to. Give me realism; I can take it.

  13. #12
    2009: Fail Ltlabner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    7,441

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    Quote Originally Posted by MWM View Post
    But I'm fairly certain the final battle in the movie is supposed to be the Battle of Cowpens, which was won by the Americans and was seen as a real turning point in the southern part of the war.
    I thought the same thing when I read the blurb.
    a super volcano of ridonkulous suckitude.

    I simply don't have access to a "cares about RBI" place in my psyche. There is a "mildly curious about OBI%" alcove just before the acid filled lake guarded by robot snipers with lasers which leads to the "cares about RBI" antechamber though. - Nate

  14. #13
    Joe Oliver love-child Blimpie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lexington
    Posts
    4,890

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    Titanic
    "Booing on opening day is like telling grandma her house smells like old lady."--WOY

  15. #14
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Midland, MI
    Posts
    6,410

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    How about a Top 10 historically accurate movies
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  16. #15
    Resident optimist OldRightHander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    east of WOY
    Posts
    5,043

    Re: Top 10 historically inaccurate movies

    I think the most entertaining historical movies are the ones that put some sort of fictional character in a historically accurate setting. There are a few historical fiction writers who are good at this, being able to make up a fictional character and then put him during a period that is rendered accurately, giving you a feel for the period and all that without having to worry about irritating details about the character being accurate or not.

    Another historical film that had a few inaccuracies was Flyboys. Every German fighter in that film was a Fokker triplane, even though during the war most of the Germans flew biplanes, but I didn't really care about that little detail. I was entertained by the story. I later heard an interview with the director saying that he used the triplanes so the viewer would be able to tell friend from foe easily while watching the aerial battle scenes. When I watch a historical film, I just want a good feel for the period. When I watch a documentary, I want impeccable accuracy. Often a film will increase my interest in a certain period and make me want to read more about it or find some good documentaries. If more people react that way, then maybe the filmmaker accomplished something, even with the artistic license.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25