Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

  1. #1
    fan EddieMilner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Buchanan, MI
    Posts
    391

    Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    As baseball is starting yet again, I get angry, yet again, to think that I live in South Bend, IN (a short 4.5 hour jaunt to GABP) and am blacked out from all Reds games.

    Is it the Reds fault for picking my area or is it MLB's fault for picking my area? I want to call/write letters/complain to someone that is responsible, but when you speak with the people from MLB.tv they are clueless. Any ideas to help this consumer try and change something?

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Topsail, NC
    Posts
    369

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    That sucks. You'd think you would be blacked out (MLB Extra Innings) since you're in Chicago's market not Cincy's.
    SECOND PLACE DOESN'T CONCERN ME

  4. #3
    fan EddieMilner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Buchanan, MI
    Posts
    391

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    Quote Originally Posted by smoke6 View Post
    That sucks. You'd think you would be blacked out (MLB Extra Innings) since you're in Chicago's market not Cincy's.
    I am blacked out for Cubs, White Sox, Tigers, and Reds. However I can get the Indians, even though they are closer than Cincinnati by 30 miles.

    I LOVE MLB!

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Topsail, NC
    Posts
    369

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    Quote Originally Posted by EddieMilner View Post
    I am blacked out for Cubs, White Sox, Tigers, and Reds. However I can get the Indians, even though they are closer than Cincinnati by 30 miles.

    I LOVE MLB!
    But at least you can see every ND football game on TV! Oh wait, everybody else on the planet can too. GO IRISH!
    SECOND PLACE DOESN'T CONCERN ME

  6. #5
    Member OesterPoster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    West-central Ohio
    Posts
    2,042

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    You can write and complain, but it's very unlikely anything will get done in 2008. With the startup of MLB's own TV network in 2009, they are supposed to be redrawing the blackout maps.

  7. #6
    fan EddieMilner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Buchanan, MI
    Posts
    391

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    Quote Originally Posted by OesterPoster View Post
    You can write and complain, but it's very unlikely anything will get done in 2008. With the startup of MLB's own TV network in 2009, they are supposed to be redrawing the blackout maps.
    I understand, I just want to start complaining, so I can get the Reds for the 09 Series Run. But that still leaves my question, who do I write my letter to? Who figures out the blackout maps?

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cookeville, Tennessee
    Posts
    337

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    I live in Tennesse and the Reds are my home team. I am pretty sure that MLB is to blame.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    saint albans, wv
    Posts
    358

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    I live outside of Charleston, WV. The only FSN I have is Pittsburgh. Reds games are blacked out, I hate it.
    "Six outs to a full inning. In a major league game, you're going to play 8 or 9 innings. That is never going to change. The money changes. People change. But the game itself is never going to change. The people who designed this thing are brilliant."-Jamie Moyer

  10. #9
    Senor Votto Degenerate39's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,914

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    Quote Originally Posted by fadetoblack2880 View Post
    I live outside of Charleston, WV. The only FSN I have is Pittsburgh. Reds games are blacked out, I hate it.
    You should consider getting Direct TV. I live outside of Charleston, WV (opposite end from you though) and I get to watch most FSNs. FSN Cincinnati is usually never blacked out for me.
    Most Vottomatic Player

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dayton
    Posts
    31

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    I live in Dayton 45 mins north of Cincy. I'm watching the game on tv. So how am I not in the blackout market. Not that I want to be.

  12. #11
    Can he be stopped?
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Notre Dame
    Posts
    1,231

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    I'm in South Bend too. Why does the MLB hate me?

    Does anyone have any working links for streaming radio since video is out of the question?
    Tom Shearn... who knew?

    Reds reccord when I attend in 2007: 6-1

  13. #12
    buffett0326
    Guest

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    I live in Barboursville, WV and I am not getting blacked out. I have dish though so not sure if that matters.

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Greentown, IN
    Posts
    167

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    A black(out) eye for baseball

    By Jeff Passan, Yahoo! Sports
    May 26, 2006




    Jey Cho is 24 years old. He helps manage trusts. He enjoys watching the Oakland Athletics in his down time. And this poses a very large problem.

    See, Cho lives in Las Vegas. While he has his choice of five Cirque du Soleil shows, a score of naked magicians and the one and, praise the Lord, only Celine Dion, he cannot see the A's. Or the San Francisco Giants. Or the Arizona Diamondbacks. Instead, when he uses his MLB.TV subscription to click on any of their games, a blank screen greets him.

    For this little slice of ironic corporate stupidity in the age of ubiquitous information, an entity actually is restricting its ubiquity fans have Major League Baseball's territorial-rights policy to thank. You see, around 40 years ago, baseball began gerrymandering specific areas of the country to teams so each one could market to a localized fan base. As media walls broke down and television coverage expanded and the NFL made billions of dollars more than its competitors with a national contract, baseball allowed teams to retreat to their fiefdoms and handle TV however they chose. Now the sport faces the double whammy of local TV revenue being the great divide between haves and have-nots that also keeps a fan like Cho wondering why he can't watch his favorite team play even though its stadium is 400 miles away.

    "I've pretty much just given up," he said. "No matter what angle I try to go at it, the response is always the same: It's the decision of the Office of the Commissioner, and no one can do anything about it."

    Not immediately, at least. Even if Bud Selig chooses to make this a priority and considering the current plan alienates fans in Las Vegas, a possible future MLB destination, along with dozens of other mid-sized TV markets near major metropolitan areas, he'd better hashing out the specifics will take time.

    ADVERTISEMENT


    The broadcasting landscape today is like HDTV to the black and white of when baseball first awarded territorial rights. Regional sports networks, created to cover the breadth of a team's territory, bring huge money, and baseball only encourages teams to exploit the rights.

    With the YES Network, the New York Yankees pull in more than $100 million a year in revenue, as their market is the big leagues' fourth-largest. (The Toronto Blue Jays, with all of Canada, have twice as many potential viewers as the second-biggest territory. The Kansas City Royals rank last.)

    By allowing teams to act individually rather than centralize its broadcasting like the NFL, baseball cedes the sport's best interest to 30 teams looking to better their own.

    So Cho tracks the A's on satellite radio and Internet gamecasts. And Charlie DeBrunner, an MLB Extra Innings subscriber for years in Harrisburg, Pa., wonders why the package, designed to broadcast up to 60 regular season, out-of-market games a week, no longer shows the Washington Nationals or Pittsburgh Pirates and only sparingly allows Baltimore Orioles games across the air. And thousands of other fans find themselves in the dark, literally, when it comes to watching their favorite teams because they live in one of the hundreds of ZIP codes each team can restrict from watching.

    "When it comes to those sort of situations," Pirates owner Kevin McClatchy said, "we need to visit those issues and make sure people have a chance to see those games."

    McClatchy is on baseball's executive council, and he said the subject of territorial rights has not come up in its meetings. He said he heard about other committees discussing the issue but never with any intent of changing it.

    Getting baseball to budge from status quo is like moving a fat cat from its designated napping spot. The sport has allowed its teams to squat on their territories for so long that asking them to loosen the standards could cause a mutiny among owners. George Steinbrenner built YES to capitalize on his team's territorial rights, and it was a brilliant business decision. The Boston Red Sox knew every cable- and satellite-equipped television would eat up the New England Sports Network, and they own 80 percent of it.

    If baseball tried to centralize television so it could take all 2,430 of its yearly games to an exclusive national package, Steinbrenner and other big-market owners would bring MLB to court quicker than you can say "antitrust exemption."

    "There's an active discussion in baseball, and it has to do with teams trying to protect their local markets," said Andrew Zimbalist, the sports economist and author of "In the Best Interest of Baseball?" "A problem like this is more easily resolved than trying to centralize television. What you can do is designate certain areas from exemption from the rules. It doesn't benefit anybody to black out markets. What might work, in these territories that overlap, is to allow the teams to cooperate and sell a package of their games to the cable distributors in those areas."

    While Zimbalist's idea would take care of servicing the fans in multiple-blackout markets, it also would involve teams agreeing upon equitable money breakdowns from the fees they would charge cable and satellite providers. And it would give the providers headaches from fans who want to see one team more than another. And it would anger the teams whose rights don't include the in-between markets and, thus, can't double dip their TV contracts.

    What comes of this is a dichotomy: Baseball surely wants all of its fans to watch as many games as possible for all of the negativity associated with the sport, it's never been richer as a business but seems to give more value to respecting its owners, whose pockets, remember, are lined by those fans.

    When he saw MLB.com's broadcasts were blacked out, Cho remembered that his local cable provider was giving a free preview to the Extra Innings package. He tried the A's channel. Black screen. He tried it the next day. Same thing.

    "I contacted the local cable company here," Cho said. "They told me they have no say over what games they're allowed to broadcast, and they just follow the rules."

    Rules that made sense a long time ago. And rules that need a rewrite, pronto.


    Jeff Passan is a national baseball writer for Yahoo! Sports.

  15. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Middleport, Ohio
    Posts
    73

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    Quote Originally Posted by Degenerate39 View Post
    You should consider getting Direct TV. I live outside of Charleston, WV (opposite end from you though) and I get to watch most FSNs. FSN Cincinnati is usually never blacked out for me.
    Quote Originally Posted by fadetoblack2880 View Post
    I live outside of Charleston, WV. The only FSN I have is Pittsburgh. Reds games are blacked out, I hate it.
    I'm in the same boat as fadetoblack2880. I live in Meigs Co. Ohio right across the river from Mason Co. WV and I get FSN Pittsburgh. I tried to go the route of Directv or Dish but apparently the earth shattering technology that is satellite tv can't go around a hill.

    I know that our cable provider sometimes pipes the Reds games in on one of the available channels, but it isn't always reliable. They will shut it off in the eight inning or it will be 2 innings late getting switched on.

    ugh

  16. #15
    Member durl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Nashvull
    Posts
    1,749

    Re: Who is responsible for the Blackouts?

    It's MLB that's to blame. Teams were allowed to, almost arbitrarily, claim home territories in which baseball fans within those territories could see only their "home" team play.

    Those who broadcast the games, either cable or satellite, only enforce the blackout rules as established by MLB.

    Great line from the article chettt posted:

    For this little slice of ironic corporate stupidity – in the age of ubiquitous information, an entity actually is restricting its ubiquity – fans have Major League Baseball's territorial-rights policy to thank. You see, around 40 years ago, baseball began gerrymandering specific areas of the country to teams so each one could market to a localized fan base. As media walls broke down and television coverage expanded and the NFL made billions of dollars more than its competitors with a national contract, baseball allowed teams to retreat to their fiefdoms and handle TV however they chose. Now the sport faces the double whammy of local TV revenue being the great divide between haves and have-nots...
    The last time I checked, revenues from the Yankees TV deal (with their own network) brought in enough money in one season to pay the Reds payroll for 2 years.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25