Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: 1931 poll of managers

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    princeton, nj
    Posts
    9,481

    1931 poll of managers



  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Beer is good!! George Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    5,964

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Gabby Street thought Hal Chase and Freddy Parent were better than George Herman Ruth??
    "Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard

  4. #3
    Member cumberlandreds's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Mid Atlantic, USA
    Posts
    16,217

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    I think most us think players of our past are better than the current crop of players. Looks like people thought the same back in 1931. Most of the players named at the top by those were players they played with or watched when they were younger. Still interesting to see who they thought were the best of all time.
    Reds Fan Since 1971

  5. #4
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,445

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Quote Originally Posted by George Anderson View Post
    Gabby Street thought Hal Chase and Freddy Parent were better than George Herman Ruth??
    Ruth was just a guy who who only hit HR... we all know how useless that was. I'm sure if The Babe lost some weight and stole some more bases he would have been more highly regarding.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  6. #5
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,143

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    Ruth was just a guy who who only hit HR... we all know how useless that was. I'm sure if The Babe lost some weight and stole some more bases he would have been more highly regarding.
    Hal Chase was considered the most graceful fielder in an era of fielding, Street was backup catcher and a marginal player most of his career, Hal Chase was often quoted by deadball era players as being the best player, a perception based on eyeballs more than anything else, something else.

    By the same measure Buck Ewing always got more accolades from 19th century players than he ever did after most of them died.

  7. #6
    Member cumberlandreds's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Mid Atlantic, USA
    Posts
    16,217

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    Ruth was just a guy who who only hit HR... we all know how useless that was. I'm sure if The Babe lost some weight and stole some more bases he would have been more highly regarding.
    He could pitch a little bit too. That's the reason I consider him the greatest ever. He was one of the few,if only one, who proved they would have been a great player pitching or hitting.
    Reds Fan Since 1971

  8. #7
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West and WNC
    Posts
    5,558

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    Hal Chase was considered the most graceful fielder in an era of fielding, Street was backup catcher and a marginal player most of his career, Hal Chase was often quoted by deadball era players as being the best player, a perception based on eyeballs more than anything else, something else.

    By the same measure Buck Ewing always got more accolades from 19th century players than he ever did after most of them died.
    "Prince" Hal Chase was also, by most accounts, one of the the biggest cheaters of all time. Interestingly, in his three years with the Reds, his defensive stats were by far the worst in the league. He had rep as a great fielder, but made a total of 402 errors in 1800 games at 1B; this is how he threw many games. He was notorious throughout the game for his gambling, and he was finally expelled from baseball after the 1919 World Series, when he was caught up in the infamous Black Sox scandal.

    http://baseball.suite101.com/article...bling_scandals
    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/cheat...rob&id=2965046
    http://www.baseball-reference.com/c/chaseha01.shtml
    sorry we're boring

  9. #8
    High five!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    6,976

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    Hal Chase was considered the most graceful fielder in an era of fielding, Street was backup catcher and a marginal player most of his career, Hal Chase was often quoted by deadball era players as being the best player, a perception based on eyeballs more than anything else, something else.

    By the same measure Buck Ewing always got more accolades from 19th century players than he ever did after most of them died.
    Wasn't Hal Chase also the most graceful at throwing games for gamblers?

  10. #9
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,143

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Quote Originally Posted by nate View Post
    Wasn't Hal Chase also the most graceful at throwing games for gamblers?
    Yep.. including a stint in the queen city

    http://www.redszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=56820

  11. #10
    Registered User red-in-la's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Santa Paula, CA
    Posts
    6,531

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Not a historian at all, but didn't Lou Gehrig show Yankee fans what a one dimensional player Ruth was?

  12. #11
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,143

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Quote Originally Posted by red-in-la View Post
    Not a historian at all, but didn't Lou Gehrig show Yankee fans what a one dimensional player Ruth was?
    Ruth a one dimensional player?

    First time I've ever seen that written.

    Short answer... No.

  13. #12
    Beer is good!! George Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    5,964

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Quote Originally Posted by red-in-la View Post
    Not a historian at all, but didn't Lou Gehrig show Yankee fans what a one dimensional player Ruth was?
    Ruth could hit for power and average. As a pitcher he was one of the best of his era until he became a full time position player and he also had the reputation of being a very good defensive outfielder. Dave Kingman was one dimensional but not Ruth
    "Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    princeton, nj
    Posts
    9,481

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Quote Originally Posted by George Anderson View Post
    Ruth could hit for power and average. As a pitcher he was one of the best of his era until he became a full time position player and he also had the reputation of being a very good defensive outfielder. Dave Kingman was one dimensional but not Ruth
    my guess is that within his era, coming out of the Deadball Era and its emphasis on defense and baserunning, Babe Ruth was one of the most one dimensional players. and some managers don't like that, as is true today.

    however, it was one BIG dimension.

    and around the time of this poll, weren't other even more one-dimensional players (Hack Wilson, Chuck Klein) beginning to appear?

  15. #14
    breath westofyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    57,143

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Quote Originally Posted by princeton View Post

    and around the time of this poll, weren't other even more one-dimensional players (Hack Wilson, Chuck Klein) beginning to appear?
    Riggs Stephenson, Bob Fothergill, Chick Hafey, Babe Herman.... the game was littered with them.

    Ruth did get thrown out at 2nd on a steal attempt to end the 1926 WS.

    Then man ran.. and not just to the hot dog cart on the train platform.

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    princeton, nj
    Posts
    9,481

    Re: 1931 poll of managers

    Quote Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
    Riggs Stephenson, Bob Fothergill, Chick Hafey, Babe Herman.... the game was littered with them.
    and weren't they a bit dissed as well? I vaguely remember reading backhanded compliments about Hafey and Herman, sort of like "they could hit the ball hard but..."


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator