Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

  1. #1
    Brett William Moore Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Crescent Springs KY
    Posts
    3,599

    Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    Right now the Reds have four defensive issues:
    1. RF - Griffey is basically a DH. Bruce will take over soon pushing Jr to LF or to the AL. Bruce should be a plus defender in RF.
    2. LF - All teams try to slip a bat here. If the Reds have Griffey or Dunn or EE in left it isn't a big deal IF the other 7 positions are good defensively.
    3. SS - Kep just doesn't have the range to be a strong defensive SS
    4. 3B - EE's throws continue to be an issue. Some think he will improve. I don't and think he belongs in LF.

    Since Phillips came to the Reds Krivsky has resisted playing him at SS.
    I don't believe I have ever heard a good explanation for this.
    Phillips has the range, arm & athleticism to play SS and played here in the minors. Flipping Kep & Phillips would improve the defense assuming Phillips can play SS as well as 2B. It would also leave 3B open for a guy with power - either EE if he can improve his D, Rosales or an acquisition.

    The 2009 Reds could look like this:
    1B Votto (L)
    2B Kep
    SS Phillips
    3B EE
    LF Dunn or Jr (L)
    CF ?
    RF Bruce (L)
    C ?

    OR

    1B Votto (L)
    2B Kep
    SS Phillips
    3B Rosales or acquisition
    LF EE
    CF ?
    RF Bruce (L)
    C ?

    Thoughts?
    .

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    10,616

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    If they thought Phillips to SS would solve any problems he would have been there some years back.

  4. #3
    Brett William Moore Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Crescent Springs KY
    Posts
    3,599

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    If they thought Phillips to SS would solve any problems he would have been there some years back.
    'They' are gone. Both Krivsky and Narron are no longer with the Reds.
    .

  5. #4
    Member Highlifeman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
    Posts
    8,694

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    Quote Originally Posted by Will M View Post
    'They' are gone. Both Krivsky and Narron are no longer with the Reds.
    What's wrong with Keppinger @ SS?

    Granted, he's no Gold Glover, and he has the range of Derek Jeter, but IMO he's working better for us than Alex Gonzalez.

  6. #5
    The Boss dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    35,262

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    Quote Originally Posted by Highlifeman21 View Post
    What's wrong with Keppinger @ SS?

    Granted, he's no Gold Glover, and he has the range of Derek Jeter, but IMO he's working better for us than Alex Gonzalez.
    You said it yourself, he has the range of Derek Jeter. That is the thing wrong with him.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    10,616

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    If they thought that Philiips to SS would solve our defensive problems, he would already be there.

    They include Dusty Baker.

    Phillips is a premier fielding secondbaseman.

    You move him to SS and Keppinger to second, we are likely weak at both.

  8. #7
    First Time Caller SunDeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Posts
    5,392

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    I think Phillips could be a serviceable SS. But he's one of the best defensive second baseman in the game right now. I'd rather keep him there and have Keppinger as SS for now.

    But they do need a longer term defensive solution at SS than Gonzalez.
    Next Reds manager, second shooter. --Confirmed on Redszone.

  9. #8
    Member redsrule2500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    3,211

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    The Reds need to just flip phillips and keppinger. Why dont they? What the crap...?
    redsrule2500
    Go Reds!
    Baseball Bliss
    Im a normal guy blessed with the ability to hit a baseball. - Sean Casey

  10. #9
    Please come again pedro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    portland, oregon
    Posts
    14,745

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    I think it's more important to have the better range player at 2nd being that EE has pretty good range at 3rd.
    Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    10,616

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    Quote Originally Posted by redsrule2500 View Post
    The Reds need to just flip phillips and keppinger. Why dont they? What the crap...?
    Becasue it would weaken he defense.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,526

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    Another issue--can Jay Bruce play CF? Is he going to be your center-fielder or your right fielder? The lineup I'd like to see, the sooner the better, would have Jay Bruce in RF, EE in LF, someone currently not on the roster in CF. Late this year would be a good time to experiment with a Kepp-Phillips switch. If that works, then you're closer to a solution than previously. If it does not, then a further question is whether Kepp hits enough to play 3rd. I suspect the Kepp-Phillips switch will not work and if you really value defense, you will have to play Kepp at third or use him as a super sub. One way to go would be to put him at 3rd, play AGon, and look for a significant offensive upgrade behind the plate. I'm also assuming that the new CF will be a significant offensive upgrade from what we have.

  13. #12
    Moderator RedlegJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    North Kansas City, Mo
    Posts
    5,752

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    Beating this drum again...Phillips is a good 2B, Kepp an adequate SS. Switch them and you're very likely to have 2 just adequate players. I think it'd be a slight drop in overall defense. A sure handed range limited shortstop who hits, works. Look at Jeter. Look at Ripken. SS/2B is NOT the Reds problem. You're trying to fix what ain't broke.

    The glaring problems are outfield defense, not enough hitting driven OBP, starters #4 & #5, and a bench without pop and redundant parts. EE at third doesn't really bother me - he is carrying a big stick and his D has steadied from the first dozen games.

    The problems are not a single player here, or switching a position there.

    Take out Arroyo's numbers and the rotation looks much better. I know you can't dismiss his numbers - what I'm pointing out is the miscalculation that assumed Harang AND Arroyo would be solid. Hence the Reds haven't added two good starters in Cueto and Volquez. They have only added one, since one of them has simply replaced the Arroyo of previous seasons.

    Compare the numbers for Harang-Cueto and Volquez with the 1-2-3 on other teams and the Reds are looking good. Then compare the guys who have made the starts in spots 4 &5. Total collapse.

    Right now the Reds are getting a chance to win in only 60% of their games. That doesn't mean they'll win those games, just that the starters will keep them in it. With some sloppy defense, dumb base running and offensive problems they've squandered some of those chances.

    They've been given no chance at all in the other 40%. Horrible pitching and the same fundamental problems simply ends their chances before those games begin. Simply to be a .500 club right now they have to win 5 of the 6 games in every 10 that the front three start. That would be hard with a gold glove/silver bat squad behind them.

    Adam Dunn said it best -it ain't early anymore. Nearly 1/6th of the season is done. Individual bats have heated up but the team's results are still bad. Pointing at BP or Adam or CP or any single player just won;t cut it. The Reds have solid looking players on paper, and just about any of them could fill a solid role on another team but as a whole they are unbalanced.

  14. #13
    nothing more than a fan Always Red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cincy West
    Posts
    5,027

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    You said it yourself, he has the range of Derek Jeter. That is the thing wrong with him.
    Can anyone here show us how many outs (and runs, and therefore games, if any) Keppinger is costing the Reds by playing SS?

    No snark, serious question.

    He gets everything in his range- very sure hands and accurate arm. BUT, you don't need to be a baseball scout to see that he doesn't have the range of Gonzo, or maybe even Lopez. How much does this really cost the Reds? I think it's a good question. Adam Everett is considered to be a heck of a defensive SS, but he can't hit, and the Asstro's finally gave up on him.

    You know, the very first Gold Glove winner in the NL at SS was Cincinnati Red, Roy McMillan (he won 3 in a row). I realize the game is MUCH different now, and the athleticism is off the charts compared to the 1950's, but how would Kepp compare to Roy McMillan?

    BTW, I think Kepp is the polar opposite of EE. EE has excellent range and can make some great plays- it's the routine plays that cause him to have brain cramps and make mistakes. Keppinger converts everything he can get to, but doesn't ever make the sensational play.

  15. #14
    Charlie Brown All-Star IslandRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    4,848

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    Quote Originally Posted by RedlegJake View Post
    Beating this drum again...Phillips is a good 2B, Kepp an adequate SS. Switch them and you're very likely to have 2 just adequate players.
    I tend to agree. I understand that Keppinger would be better at 2B than he is at SS and Phillips would have a little better range at short than Kepp does. But Phillips would not be a plus shortstop, just an incremental upgrade, and Keppinger is not as good as Phillips at second, either. So we'd improve one, weaken the other and wind up about where we are, if not worse while they each got used to playing the new position full-time.

    Mostly, when a player is an obvious plus at an important defensive position as Phillips is, I'm a big fan of leaving him there.
    Not all who wander are lost

  16. #15
    Member redsrule2500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    3,211

    Re: Would Phillips to SS fix the Reds defense?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    Becasue it would weaken he defense.
    I don't see how, could you explain your point?
    redsrule2500
    Go Reds!
    Baseball Bliss
    Im a normal guy blessed with the ability to hit a baseball. - Sean Casey


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25