Right now the Reds have four defensive issues:
1. RF - Griffey is basically a DH. Bruce will take over soon pushing Jr to LF or to the AL. Bruce should be a plus defender in RF.
2. LF - All teams try to slip a bat here. If the Reds have Griffey or Dunn or EE in left it isn't a big deal IF the other 7 positions are good defensively.
3. SS - Kep just doesn't have the range to be a strong defensive SS
4. 3B - EE's throws continue to be an issue. Some think he will improve. I don't and think he belongs in LF.
Since Phillips came to the Reds Krivsky has resisted playing him at SS.
I don't believe I have ever heard a good explanation for this.
Phillips has the range, arm & athleticism to play SS and played here in the minors. Flipping Kep & Phillips would improve the defense assuming Phillips can play SS as well as 2B. It would also leave 3B open for a guy with power - either EE if he can improve his D, Rosales or an acquisition.
The 2009 Reds could look like this:
1B Votto (L)
2B Kep
SS Phillips
3B EE
LF Dunn or Jr (L)
CF ?
RF Bruce (L)
C ?
OR
1B Votto (L)
2B Kep
SS Phillips
3B Rosales or acquisition
LF EE
CF ?
RF Bruce (L)
C ?
Thoughts?