Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Edwin Jackson

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    9,868

    Edwin Jackson

    Plenty of teams continue to express interest in the Rays' Edwin Jackson. Something has to give in their rotation when Scott Kazmir returns, but demoting Andy Sonnanstine to the pen would solve the logjam.

    www.mlbtraderumors.com

    --

    Hate to keep bringing it up, but with Cueto, Belisle and Arroyo all struggling, it's looking like less of a bad idea- that is, as long as we wouldn't have to give up too much. Tampa, how would you like a young power hitting 3B that strikes out a lot (and I'm not talking about Edwin). You can move him to 1B or the OF if you want.
    Go BLUE!!!

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    6,429

    Re: Edwin Jackson

    He's not very good. I'd probably rather have Matt Belisle in my rotation...
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  4. #3
    Vavasor TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Amarillo, TX
    Posts
    13,440

    Re: Edwin Jackson

    Except he seems to have turned a corner this year, at leas so far. Nobody is hitting the ball hard against him, he isn't walking a lot of guys either. He has a middlin K/9 rate, but yeah, I'd take him.
    Suck it up cupcake.

  5. #4
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    6,429

    Re: Edwin Jackson

    Quote Originally Posted by TRF View Post
    Except he seems to have turned a corner this year, at leas so far. Nobody is hitting the ball hard against him, he isn't walking a lot of guys either. He has a middlin K/9 rate, but yeah, I'd take him.
    Small Sample Alert!

    30.3 IP
    6.83 H/9
    6.53 K/9
    4.75 BB/9
    0.59 HR/9
    17.2 LD%
    46.0 GB%
    4.55 xFIP
    .247 BABIP

    I'd give him some time, he'll return to his old-self...
    Last edited by *BaseClogger*; 04-30-2008 at 11:18 AM.
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  6. #5
    Stat Wanker Hodiernus RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    16,027

    Re: Edwin Jackson

    Agreed BaseClogger. No way does Edwin maintain that LD% when he's walking that many and striking out so few. He's also allowed just 2 HR. The scouting report may suggest otherwise, but I see no step forward whatsoever, just a low ERA coming from a small sample.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  7. #6
    Vavasor TRF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Amarillo, TX
    Posts
    13,440

    Re: Edwin Jackson

    ooops. I was looking at his K/BB thinking it was his BB/9.
    Suck it up cupcake.

  8. #7
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    6,429

    Re: Edwin Jackson

    I thought he was an okay option as a long reliever in the bullpen instead of Josh Fogg before the season started (assuming Krivsky had received some positive scouting reports). But now that his value has skyrocketed the asking price would likely be way too high (not to mention there is no way he would be in the bullpen instead of the rotation)...
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    9,868

    Re: Edwin Jackson

    Quote Originally Posted by *BaseClogger* View Post
    I thought he was an okay option as a long reliever in the bullpen instead of Josh Fogg before the season started (assuming Krivsky had received some positive scouting reports). But now that his value has skyrocketed the asking price would likely be way too high (not to mention there is no way he would be in the bullpen instead of the rotation)...
    Probably true. I might offer up a Waring and/or a Szymanski just to see if they bite. He does have considerable upside if he can ever put it all together. Maybe they'll take Ryan Freel?
    Go BLUE!!!


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25