Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 56

Thread: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

  1. #1
    Greatness In The Making RedLegSuperStar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    4,078

    Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    MLBTradeRumors.com -

    Rosenthal expects the Reds to move Scott Hatteberg and a catcher before they get down to the more serious business of mullling offers for Adam Dunn and Ken Griffey Jr.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    A Pleasure to Burn Joseph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Avenue
    Posts
    8,613

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Gee, they really went out on a limb there.

    Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
    Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
    Chicago Blackhawks - 10, 13, 15
    University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
    Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98


    “Everything that happens before Death is what counts.”
    ― Ray Bradbury, Something Wicked This Way Comes

  4. #3
    Man Pills Falls City Beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    31,228

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Mulling offers for Griffey? Really? What the hell are they waiting on?
    “And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.” Jamie Galbraith

  5. #4
    Smooth WMR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky
    Posts
    16,960

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    Mulling offers for Griffey? Really? What the hell are they waiting on?
    An offer?

  6. #5
    Member Spring~Fields's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    8,630

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    I have been frustrated that Hatteberg and the additional catcher is even on the team, when the team needed other versatile players who could be utilized and contribute instead of riding the bench while being stifled by the makeup of this team. I am kind of surprised that Jocketty being the former advisor to the ownership and now GM hadn’t already observed the need for a change there and taken care of it. I guess it takes time to move players for a PTNL. Perhaps no one wants them.

  7. #6
    Man Pills Falls City Beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    31,228

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Quote Originally Posted by WilyMoROCKS View Post
    An offer?
    The wording's a bit weird, I guess. It sort of implies that the offers have been made but that they haven't gotten around to mulling them over. Maybe not.
    “And when finally they sense that some position cannot be sustained, they do not re-examine their ideas. Instead, they simply change the subject.” Jamie Galbraith

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,320

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    The wording's a bit weird, I guess. It sort of implies that the offers have been made but that they haven't gotten around to mulling them over. Maybe not.
    There is the small matter of convincing Junior that it's in his best interest (and the teams) for him to be playing elsewhere later in the summer.

    Kind of tough to do that quietly during a 6 game winning streak.
    "Even a bad day at the ballpark beats the snot out of most other good days. I'll take my scorecard and pencil and beer and hot dog and rage at the dips and cheer at the highs, but I'm not ever going to stop loving this game and this team and nobody will ever take that away from me." Roy Tucker October 2010

  9. #8
    Smooth WMR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lexington, Kentucky
    Posts
    16,960

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    The wording's a bit weird, I guess. It sort of implies that the offers have been made but that they haven't gotten around to mulling them over. Maybe not.
    Hehe, true. If so, I hope not.

  10. #9
    Member Spring~Fields's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    8,630

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Quote Originally Posted by Falls City Beer View Post
    The wording's a bit weird, I guess. It sort of implies that the offers have been made but that they haven't gotten around to mulling them over. Maybe not.
    I think that they are going to be mulling things over until the off season.

    As you know that some of these guys shouldn't have been on the team to begin with, so they really mulled that one.

  11. #10
    RZ Chamber of Commerce Unassisted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Athens, OH
    Posts
    13,572

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Maybe the trades of Hatteberg and a catcher are intended to reel in spare parts they could throw in to make a trade of Junior possible?
    /r/reds

  12. #11
    Member Reds Fanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Piqua, OH
    Posts
    19,727

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Quote Originally Posted by WilyMoROCKS View Post
    An offer?
    That is exactly it. Fay's article Sunday said according to Walt Jocketty they have had no calls about Junior yet. I don't really think they will get calls until a lot closer to the trade deadline. There just are not many deals made until teams see where they are closer to the deadline.

  13. #12
    Haunted by walks
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Syracuse
    Posts
    9,950

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    The phone goes both ways.

  14. #13
    Pre-tty, pre-tty good!! MWM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    12,334

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Who would want any of the catchers the Reds have?
    Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David

  15. #14
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,820

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Quote Originally Posted by MWM View Post
    Who would want any of the catchers the Reds have?

    Jerry Narron.
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  16. #15
    Will post for food BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Dublin, OH
    Posts
    5,512

    Re: Hatteberg And Catcher Could Be Dealt First...

    Quote Originally Posted by MWM View Post
    Who would want any of the catchers the Reds have?

    I'm sure the Yankees wouldn't mind having Bako right now.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator