Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Ryan Hanigan....

  1. #1
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    8,132

    Ryan Hanigan....

    Could someone give me some details of Hanigan's defense & pitch calling skills?

    I see us carrying 3 catchers. All of whom are substandard (even with Bako playing above his norm...for now). Why is Hanigan not up with the big club? He's hitting at .324 and he also hits from the right side. Two things this club needs rather desperately right now. Average and righties.

    Is his defense that porous? Does he call that poor of a game? Is his arm a limp noodle? I just don't get it.
    2014 predictions:
    99-63 WS champs (Cards take 2nd WC, Mil 3rd, Pit 4th, Chi 5th)
    Bruce/Votto neck and neck MVP race (neither takes it)
    Bailey CYA winner
    Hamilton ROY & GG

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Senor Votto Degenerate39's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,914

    Re: Ryan Hanigan....

    DFA Javy and call him up.
    Most Vottomatic Player

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    13,175

    Re: Ryan Hanigan....

    Maybe it has something to do with his .648 OPS at Louisville last year in 127 at bats or his .609 OPS the prior year at Chatanooga in 126 at bats or the fact that his current success is the product of a sample of 71 at bats in 2008.

  5. #4
    Vampire Weekend @Bernie's camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    11,431

    Re: Ryan Hanigan....

    I don't know much about his defense, but he's not very good at hitting for power, and it's not like he hasn't had time to show some power. Still, I'm with you . . . I'd rather see him with the team as opposed to Bako or Valentin.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    259

    Re: Ryan Hanigan....

    Quote Originally Posted by camisadelgolf View Post
    I don't know much about his defense, but he's not very good at hitting for power, and it's not like he hasn't had time to show some power. Still, I'm with you . . . I'd rather see him with the team as opposed to Bako or Valentin.
    I'd rather see him up there too.

    But since when do you need a SS or C to hit for power ?? That's what the OF's, 1B, and maybe your 3B's are for. Philips is icing on the cake.

  7. #6
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    8,132

    Re: Ryan Hanigan....

    Exactly. I couldn't care less if he hits with power or not. If he gets on base and hits for a decent average...I'm fine with his bat. My only concern is his glove/arm/mind.
    2014 predictions:
    99-63 WS champs (Cards take 2nd WC, Mil 3rd, Pit 4th, Chi 5th)
    Bruce/Votto neck and neck MVP race (neither takes it)
    Bailey CYA winner
    Hamilton ROY & GG

  8. #7
    Moderator RedlegJake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    North Kansas City, Mo
    Posts
    5,610

    Re: Ryan Hanigan....

    Hanigan is a decent OBP guy (just adequate mind you but likely better than Bako) with almost no power. As a backup I think he fits the bill okay but Craig Tatum is close behind and, imo, much better suited long term as the backup. He has some pop and is a plus defender. Tatum's stock has fallen since reaching Chattanooga but hopefully he'll get back on track.

    Alvin Colina was a hot shot prospect for Colorado once, too and see how that worked out. None of these guys are really an answer to anything except a once a week backup role. Mesaraco may be the real deal but he's along way off.

    If the Reds want to improve the catching spot they can only do it by trade. Hanigan, Colina or Tatum might be cheaper for the same production as Bako and Ross but they still won't be anyone's definition of good. Just my opinion.
    Last edited by RedlegJake; 05-25-2008 at 02:23 AM.

  9. #8
    Will post for food BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Dublin, OH
    Posts
    5,328

    Re: Ryan Hanigan....

    I'm not sure I understand why he's even on the 40-man roster.

  10. #9
    Vampire Weekend @Bernie's camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    11,431

    Re: Ryan Hanigan....

    Quote Originally Posted by BuckeyeRedleg View Post
    I'm not sure I understand why he's even on the 40-man roster.
    It's to keep him protected from the rule five draft. If the Reds want to take him off the 40-man, I'm sure there are close to 29 teams who would like to grab him off the waiver wire. Offensively, he's basically Jason Kendall, and Kendall managed to get paid over $30mm over the past three years. Defensively, well, he's no Jason Kendall.

  11. #10
    Will post for food BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Dublin, OH
    Posts
    5,328

    Re: Ryan Hanigan....

    Quote Originally Posted by camisadelgolf View Post
    It's to keep him protected from the rule five draft. If the Reds want to take him off the 40-man, I'm sure there are close to 29 teams who would like to grab him off the waiver wire. Offensively, he's basically Jason Kendall, and Kendall managed to get paid over $30mm over the past three years. Defensively, well, he's no Jason Kendall.

    Wasn't he left off the 40-man roster last year (and the year before that and the year before that)? Where were the 29 teams lined up that wanted him in those years?

    There is no reason to have 4 catchers on the 40-man roster, especially if the 4th one is Ryan Hanigan.

  12. #11
    Vampire Weekend @Bernie's camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    11,431

    Re: Ryan Hanigan....

    Quote Originally Posted by BuckeyeRedleg View Post
    Wasn't he left off the 40-man roster last year (and the year before that and the year before that)? Where were the 29 teams lined up that wanted him in those years?
    Hanigan has always been considered kind of an afterthought due to his lack of tools, and until 2007, no one would've considered him a top-30 prospect in the organization. Also, he regressed a huge amount in 2006, and it was most likely due to injuries (that limited him to only 64 games). If he had shown plus receiver skills, power, and/or speed by then, he would've had a good chance of being on someone's 40-man roster. There are plenty of players who were considered borderline prospects for their first few years as professionals before being desired by other organizations, and Hanigan is another example. He's no perennial All-Star, but I'd be thrilled to have him as a backup.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25