Turn Off Ads?
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Double switching Dunn

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    13,175

    Double switching Dunn

    He's played good left field this year. Much improved. He's red hot at the bat, almost carrying the team (along with Phillips). The time has come to stop removing Adam Dunn from games in double switches.

    Meanwhile, Griffey played 18 innings today after a night game yesterday. He stays out there no matter what.

    Keep Dunn in the game.

  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: Double switching Dunn

    especially considering the poor defenders at other key positions ... getting Dunn out of LF should be the least of Dusty late game worries.
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  4. #3
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,110

    Re: Double switching Dunn

    Quote Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
    He's played good left field this year. Much improved. He's red hot at the bat, almost carrying the team (along with Phillips). The time has come to stop removing Adam Dunn from games in double switches.

    Meanwhile, Griffey played 18 innings today after a night game yesterday. He stays out there no matter what.

    Keep Dunn in the game.
    Yep, and somehow Hairston remains at short, when defensive replacement time comes along.
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  5. #4
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: Double switching Dunn

    BTW, the double switch today hosed his lineup in addition to removing Dunn
    What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand

  6. #5
    Start the Reactor! *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Midland, MI
    Posts
    6,410

    Re: Double switching Dunn

    An excuse I read, and it is a decent one, is that Griffey was batting #3 and Dunn #5, so it would have meant the pitcher batting two spots higher in the order. However, that is a moot point if Dusty could correctly fill out a lineup card...
    "On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."

  7. #6
    Member Ron Madden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,815

    Re: Double switching Dunn

    I agree KC.

    IIRC one ball was hit to LF after Dusty removed Dunn, Freel played it into a double.


  8. #7
    I hate the Cubs LoganBuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,110

    Re: Double switching Dunn

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Madden View Post
    I agree KC.

    I think IIRC one ball was hit to LF after Dusty removed Dunn, Freel played it into a double.

    Imo, Dunn with his large frame may have gotten to that ball. Freel didn't have to go far, but his stubby little frame left him a foot short.
    The Sox traded Bullfrog the only player they've got for Shottenhoffen. Four-eyes Shottenhoffen a utility infielder. They've got a whole team of utility infielders.

  9. #8
    Party like it's 1990 Blitz Dorsey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    4,716

    Re: Double switching Dunn

    Again, Dusty doesn't have the onions to pull the awful Griffey from the game defensively, or move him from the No. 3 hole in the lineup that he has turned into an abyss.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    13,175

    Re: Double switching Dunn

    Quote Originally Posted by Blitz Dorsey View Post
    Again, Dusty doesn't have the onions to pull the awful Griffey from the game defensively, or move him from the No. 3 hole in the lineup that he has turned into an abyss.
    Perhaps Dusty has been told to keep Griffey in the game until he gets 600. Dusty may be taking that too literally. Griff playing 18 today really is questionable.

  11. #10
    KungFu Fighter AtomicDumpling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Hamilton, OH
    Posts
    2,690

    Re: Double switching Dunn

    I can't understand why Baker put Freel in as a defensive replacement for Dunn. Freel has been awful in the field this year, both at 3B and LF. He should have been charged with several errors the last three games.

    That ball in left field should have been caught today. Dunn would have caught it. Freel got a late jump then misplayed it at the end. It cost us the game.

    Then Freel makes a bonehead baserunning play later in the game that erased a chance to win.

  12. #11
    Titanic Struggles Caveat Emperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The 513
    Posts
    12,622

    Re: Double switching Dunn

    If you're going to keep Griffey in RF, there's simply zero justification to allow Dunn to be double-switched out of the game.

    They're a wash defensively (with the edge possibly going to Dunn, since he plays a less important position), and Dunn's bat is far superior to anything Griffey brings to the table.

    The simple answer is that Dunn belongs in the game at all times. His bat is worth the risk of an occasional extra base hit.
    Championships Matter.
    23 Years and Counting...


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | GIK | BCubb2003 | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | Plus Plus | RedlegJake | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25